OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether sublingual misoprostol administered one hour before intrauterine device (IUD) insertion reduces failed insertions, insertion-related complications and pain in parous women delivered only by elective caesarean section (CS). METHODS: Single-blind randomised controlled trial conducted in Ismailia, Egypt, between July 2010 and December 2011. Women who had never delivered otherwise than by elective CS and desirous of using an IUD were randomly allocated to receive sublingually 400 μg misoprostol and 100 mg diclofenac (misoprostol group) or 100 mg diclofenac alone (control group) one hour before IUD insertion. Outcome measures were failed insertion, ease of insertion judged by the investigators, insertion-related complications, and patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: In all, 255 women (130 and 125 in the study and control groups, respectively) had an IUD inserted. Seven insertions failed: five in the control group, and two in the study group. Ease of insertion and patients' satisfaction were comparable in both groups. Abdominal pain and nausea were the commonest side effects reported in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSION: Sublingual administration of misoprostol one hour before IUD insertion in parous women with no previous vaginal delivery does not facilitate the procedure and may cause undesirable side effects. This approach is not recommended as a standard treatment.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether sublingual misoprostol administered one hour before intrauterine device (IUD) insertion reduces failed insertions, insertion-related complications and pain in parous women delivered only by elective caesarean section (CS). METHODS: Single-blind randomised controlled trial conducted in Ismailia, Egypt, between July 2010 and December 2011. Women who had never delivered otherwise than by elective CS and desirous of using an IUD were randomly allocated to receive sublingually 400 μg misoprostol and 100 mg diclofenac (misoprostol group) or 100 mg diclofenac alone (control group) one hour before IUD insertion. Outcome measures were failed insertion, ease of insertion judged by the investigators, insertion-related complications, and patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: In all, 255 women (130 and 125 in the study and control groups, respectively) had an IUD inserted. Seven insertions failed: five in the control group, and two in the study group. Ease of insertion and patients' satisfaction were comparable in both groups. Abdominal pain and nausea were the commonest side effects reported in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSION: Sublingual administration of misoprostol one hour before IUD insertion in parous women with no previous vaginal delivery does not facilitate the procedure and may cause undesirable side effects. This approach is not recommended as a standard treatment.
Authors: Katherine L O'Flynn O'Brien; Aletha Y Akers; Lisa K Perriera; Courtney A Schreiber; J Felipe Garcia-Espana; Sarita Sonalkar Journal: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 1.814
Authors: Laureen M Lopez; Alissa Bernholc; Yanwu Zeng; Rebecca H Allen; Deborah Bartz; Paul A O'Brien; David Hubacher Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-07-29