Literature DB >> 23750920

Depigmented skin and phantom color measurements for realistic prostheses.

Paul Tanner1, Sancy Leachman, Kenneth Boucher, Tunçer Burak Ozçelik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that regardless of human skin phototype, areas of depigmented skin, as seen in vitiligo, are optically indistinguishable among skin phototypes. The average of the depigmented skin measurements can be used to develop the base color of realistic prostheses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data was analyzed from 20 of 32 recruited vitiligo study participants. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy measurements were made from depigmented skin and adjacent pigmented skin, then compared with 66 pigmented polydimethylsiloxane phantoms to determine pigment concentrations in turbid media for making realistic facial prostheses.
RESULTS: The Area Under spectral intensity Curve (AUC) was calculated for average spectroscopy measurements of pigmented sites in relation to skin phototype (P = 0.0505) and depigmented skin in relation to skin phototype (P = 0.59). No significant relationship exists between skin phototypes and depigmented skin spectroscopy measurements. The average of the depigmented skin measurements (AUC 19,129) was the closest match to phantom 6.4 (AUC 19,162).
CONCLUSION: Areas of depigmented skin are visibly indistinguishable per skin phototype, yet spectrometry shows that depigmented skin measurements varied and were unrelated to skin phototype. Possible sources of optical variation of depigmented skin include age, body site, blood flow, quantity/quality of collagen, and other chromophores. The average of all depigmented skin measurements can be used to derive the pigment composition and concentration for realistic facial prostheses.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaplastology; diffuse reflectance spectrometry; facial prosthetics; skin phantom; vitiligo

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23750920      PMCID: PMC3783653          DOI: 10.1111/srt.12080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skin Res Technol        ISSN: 0909-752X            Impact factor:   2.365


  16 in total

1.  Design of an optical system for interrogation of implanted luminescent sensors and verification with silicone skin phantoms.

Authors:  Ruiqi Long; Mike McShane
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Analysis of edge-losses in reflectance measurements of pigmented maxillofacial elastomer.

Authors:  W M Johnston; N S Hesse; B K Davis; R R Seghi
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 3.  Understanding colors in nature.

Authors:  C F Bohren
Journal:  Pigment Cell Res       Date:  1988

4.  The reproduction of skin color and texture in facial prostheses for Negro patients.

Authors:  T O Aina; S M Wright; E Pullen-Warner
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Tycho Brahe and his sixteenth century nasal prosthesis.

Authors:  D C Lee
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Base shade determination of a new elastomer for maxillofacial prostheses.

Authors:  J D Duncan; E H Rommerdale
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Reflection spectrophotometry of facial skin.

Authors:  A Koran; J M Powers; C N Raptis; R Yu
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  The optics of human skin.

Authors:  R R Anderson; J A Parrish
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Autofluorescence of human skin is age-related after correction for skin pigmentation and redness.

Authors:  R Na; I M Stender; M Henriksen; H C Wulf
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.551

10.  Spectroscopic characteristics of human melanin in vivo.

Authors:  N Kollias; A Baqer
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 8.551

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.