Literature DB >> 23750160

Of creatures great and small: the advantages of farm animal models in immunology research.

Amanda J Gibson1, Tracey J Coffey, Dirk Werling.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23750160      PMCID: PMC3664326          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


× No keyword cloud information.
In recent decades the inappropriate use of antibiotics in farm animals, either as growth enhancers or for treatment of infectious diseases, has resulted both in higher concentrations of antibiotic residues in meat destined for the human food chain and in an increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (Carlet et al., 2012). Increased public concerns regarding their potential impact on human health may result in a reduction or cessation in the use of antibiotics in farm animals (Veterinary Record, 2011, 2012). Thus, alternative treatments for the control of infectious diseases in farm animals need to be identified as a research priority. In achieving this goal, the physiological relevance of an animal model to the intended target population becomes a key factor. The majority of models currently used for pharmaceutical research are murine and it is possible that potentially valuable therapeutics are discounted on the basis of lack of responses generated in this system, as shown very recently for sepsis (Seok et al., 2013). Several non-rodent species, such as cattle, pigs, and chicken, are both valuable models for infectious diseases in humans (Hein and Griebel, 2003; Visscher and Goddard, 2011; Waters et al., 2011; Costa et al., 2012; Meurens et al., 2012) and important clinical targets in their own right. Effective vaccines have been developed for many acute viral and bacterial infections, whereas for others, like tuberculosis (TB), there is still a need for reliable vaccines. Pathology seen in the murine models of TB currently used is very different to the pathology seen in humans (Gupta and Katoch, 2009), whereas the bovine and human diseases share many similarities (Waters et al., 2011). For such diseases it is crucial that we use natural disease-models, with the appropriate pathogen in the most appropriate host, to examine the host-pathogen interactions that occur in outbred populations. A fundamental point in the development of new and improved intervention strategies is the understanding of host differences in the innate immune response, which primes the subsequent adaptive immune response. Although the innate immune system has been largely conserved during evolution, marked variations and diversity exist between different mammalian species within Pattern-Recognition-Receptor (PRR) structure (Jungi et al., 2011). These differences are based on evolutionary pressure within the innate immune system, potentially reflecting the specific threats encountered by each species (Zhang et al., 2010). This selective pressure appears to be absent in the available murine sequences (Werling et al., 2009). The similarity between human and farm animal PRR (Jungi et al., 2011) is further supported by their similar response to ligands (Kapetanovic et al., 2012), in contrast to murine PRR (Hajjar et al., 2002; Grabiec et al., 2004; Farhat et al., 2010). Since recognition by PRR is associated with adaptive immunity by providing optimal immunostimulation, learning more about these key molecules in farm animals might inform us about their adjuvant effect in vaccines for use in these animals as well as humans. Given the size and blood volumes of farm animals, there are also greater opportunities to repeatedly access to different cell types – an asset which would facilitate the assessment of cell specific effects of such immunomodulatory agents on autologous cells (Hein and Griebel, 2003). Farm animal models do have their disadvantages such as dedicated housing, biosecurity, and the confinement of infected animals. However, it is misleading to rely on murine models to fill the gaps in our knowledge of disease-pathogenesis, and choosing a research model should be more than just a matter of convenience and convention (Bolker, 2012). However, in addition to their potential use as models for human diseases, research in farm-animals models have a “right-on-their-own,” taken the predicted increase in food supply necessary by 70% to support an ever-increasing global population as well as the occurrence of new emerging diseases, such as Schmallenberg virus into account. These challenges can be faced and overcome by an increased readiness of farm animal research centers to apply their models in novel ways, a willingness of the medical profession to accept more suitable disease-models, and a willingness of funding agencies and companies to invest in this type of research partnership.
  18 in total

1.  US FDA told to stop certain antibiotics being used as growth promoters.

Authors: 
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Cattle gain stature.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Human Toll-like receptor 4 recognizes host-specific LPS modifications.

Authors:  Adeline M Hajjar; Robert K Ernst; Jeff H Tsai; Christopher B Wilson; Samuel I Miller
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2002-03-25       Impact factor: 25.606

4.  Identification of full length bovine TLR1 and functional characterization of lipopeptide recognition by bovine TLR2/1 heterodimer.

Authors:  Katja Farhat; Sabine Riekenberg; Günther Jung; Karl-Heinz Wiesmüller; Thomas W Jungi; Artur J Ulmer
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.683

5.  Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases.

Authors:  Junhee Seok; H Shaw Warren; Alex G Cuenca; Michael N Mindrinos; Henry V Baker; Weihong Xu; Daniel R Richards; Grace P McDonald-Smith; Hong Gao; Laura Hennessy; Celeste C Finnerty; Cecilia M López; Shari Honari; Ernest E Moore; Joseph P Minei; Joseph Cuschieri; Paul E Bankey; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jason Sperry; Avery B Nathens; Timothy R Billiar; Michael A West; Marc G Jeschke; Matthew B Klein; Richard L Gamelli; Nicole S Gibran; Bernard H Brownstein; Carol Miller-Graziano; Steve E Calvano; Philip H Mason; J Perren Cobb; Laurence G Rahme; Stephen F Lowry; Ronald V Maier; Lyle L Moldawer; David N Herndon; Ronald W Davis; Wenzhong Xiao; Ronald G Tompkins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Pig bone marrow-derived macrophages resemble human macrophages in their response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide.

Authors:  Ronan Kapetanovic; Lynsey Fairbairn; Dario Beraldi; David P Sester; Alan L Archibald; Christopher K Tuggle; David A Hume
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 7.  Variation matters: TLR structure and species-specific pathogen recognition.

Authors:  Dirk Werling; Oliver C Jann; Victoria Offord; Elizabeth J Glass; Tracey J Coffey
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 8.  Tuberculosis immunity: opportunities from studies with cattle.

Authors:  W Ray Waters; Mitchell V Palmer; Tyler C Thacker; William C Davis; Srinand Sreevatsan; Paul Coussens; Kieran G Meade; Jayne C Hope; D Mark Estes
Journal:  Clin Dev Immunol       Date:  2010-12-06

Review 9.  The pig: a model for human infectious diseases.

Authors:  François Meurens; Artur Summerfield; Hans Nauwynck; Linda Saif; Volker Gerdts
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 17.079

10.  Ready for a world without antibiotics? The Pensières Antibiotic Resistance Call to Action.

Authors:  Jean Carlet; Vincent Jarlier; Stephan Harbarth; Andreas Voss; Herman Goossens; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.887

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Farmed deer: A veterinary model for chronic mycobacterial diseases that is accessible, appropriate and cost-effective.

Authors:  Frank Griffin
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2014-01

2.  A large animal model for standardized testing of bone regeneration strategies.

Authors:  James C Ferguson; Stefan Tangl; Dirk Barnewitz; Antje Genzel; Patrick Heimel; Veronika Hruschka; Heinz Redl; Thomas Nau
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Mammalian lectin arrays for screening host-microbe interactions.

Authors:  Sabine A F Jégouzo; Conor Nelson; Thomas Hardwick; S T Angel Wong; Noel Kuan Kiat Lau; Gaik Kin Emily Neoh; Rocío Castellanos-Rueda; Zhiyao Huang; Benjamin Mignot; Aanya Hirdaramani; Annie Howitt; Kathryn Frewin; Zheng Shen; Rhys J Fox; Rachel Wong; Momoko Ando; Lauren Emony; Henderson Zhu; Angela Holder; Dirk Werling; Nitya Krishnan; Brian D Robertson; Abigail Clements; Maureen E Taylor; Kurt Drickamer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Use of Precision-Cut Tissue Slices as a Translational Model to Study Host-Pathogen Interaction.

Authors:  Dominika Majorova; Elizabeth Atkins; Henny Martineau; Ivan Vokral; Dorenda Oosterhuis; Peter Olinga; Brendan Wren; Jon Cuccui; Dirk Werling
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.