Literature DB >> 23750070

Random effects coefficient of determination for mixed and meta-analysis models.

Eugene Demidenko1, James Sargent, Tracy Onega.   

Abstract

The key feature of a mixed model is the presence of random effects. We have developed a coefficient, called the random effects coefficient of determination, [Formula: see text], that estimates the proportion of the conditional variance of the dependent variable explained by random effects. This coefficient takes values from 0 to 1 and indicates how strong the random effects are. The difference from the earlier suggested fixed effects coefficient of determination is emphasized. If [Formula: see text] is close to 0, there is weak support for random effects in the model because the reduction of the variance of the dependent variable due to random effects is small; consequently, random effects may be ignored and the model simplifies to standard linear regression. The value of [Formula: see text] apart from 0 indicates the evidence of the variance reduction in support of the mixed model. If random effects coefficient of determination is close to 1 the variance of random effects is very large and random effects turn into free fixed effects-the model can be estimated using the dummy variable approach. We derive explicit formulas for [Formula: see text] in three special cases: the random intercept model, the growth curve model, and meta-analysis model. Theoretical results are illustrated with three mixed model examples: (1) travel time to the nearest cancer center for women with breast cancer in the U.S., (2) cumulative time watching alcohol related scenes in movies among young U.S. teens, as a risk factor for early drinking onset, and (3) the classic example of the meta-analysis model for combination of 13 studies on tuberculosis vaccine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  F-test; clustered data; growth curve; longitudinal data; random effect; random intercept

Year:  2012        PMID: 23750070      PMCID: PMC3673750          DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2010.535631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods        ISSN: 0361-0926            Impact factor:   0.893


  10 in total

1.  Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models.

Authors:  Ronghui Xu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Cancer surpasses heart disease as leading cause of death for all but the very elderly.

Authors:  Renee Twombly
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update.

Authors:  Rebecca DerSimonian; Raghu Kacker
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

5.  A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis.

Authors:  C S Berkey; D C Hoaglin; F Mosteller; G A Colditz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Age at first alcohol use: a risk factor for the development of alcohol disorders.

Authors:  D J DeWit; E M Adlaf; D R Offord; A C Ogborne
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Prevalence of alcohol use and the association between onset of use and alcohol-related problems in a general population sample in Germany.

Authors:  L Kraus; K Bloomfield; R Augustin; A Reese
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Age of drinking onset and unintentional injury involvement after drinking.

Authors:  R W Hingson; T Heeren; A Jamanka; J Howland
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model.

Authors:  Lloyd J Edwards; Keith E Muller; Russell D Wolfinger; Bahjat F Qaqish; Oliver Schabenberger
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Alcohol use in motion pictures and its relation with early-onset teen drinking.

Authors:  James D Sargent; Thomas A Wills; Mike Stoolmiller; Jennifer Gibson; Frederick X Gibbons
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2006-01
  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Time-varying coefficient of determination to quantify the explanatory power of biomarkers on longitudinal GFR among children with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Derek K Ng; Anthony A Portale; Susan L Furth; Bradley A Warady; Alvaro Muñoz
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  r2mlm: An R package calculating R-squared measures for multilevel models.

Authors:  Mairead Shaw; Jason D Rights; Sonya S Sterba; Jessica Kay Flake
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 3.  Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin injection for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sung Ryul Shim; Young Joo Cho; In-Soo Shin; Jae Heon Kim
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  A systematic review of the risk factors for suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt and completed suicide among children and adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa between 1986 and 2018: protocol for a systematic review of observational studies.

Authors:  Godfrey Zari Rukundo; Elizabeth Kemigisha; Moses Ocan; Wilson Adriko; Dickens Howard Akena
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-12

5.  The p-Value You Can't Buy.

Authors:  Eugene Demidenko
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 8.710

6.  A novel estimator of between-study variance in random-effects models.

Authors:  Nan Wang; Jun Zhang; Li Xu; Jing Qi; Beibei Liu; Yiyang Tang; Yinan Jiang; Liang Cheng; Qinghua Jiang; Xunbo Yin; Shuilin Jin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.969

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.