BACKGROUND: Tissue invasion is a hallmark of most human cancers and remains a major source of treatment failure in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Although EGFR amplification has been previously associated with more invasive tumor behavior, existing experimental models have not supported quantitative evaluation of interpatient differences in tumor cell migration or testing of patient-specific responses to therapies targeting invasion. To explore these questions, we optimized an ex vivo organotypic slice culture system allowing for labeling and tracking of tumor cells in human GBM slice cultures. METHODS: With use of time-lapse confocal microscopy of retrovirally labeled tumor cells in slices, baseline differences in migration speed and efficiency were determined and correlated with EGFR amplification in a cohort of patients with GBM. Slices were treated with gefitinib to evaluate anti-invasive effects associated with targeting EGFR. RESULTS: Migration analysis identified significant patient-to-patient variation at baseline. EGFR amplification was correlated with increased migration speed and efficiency compared with nonamplified tumors. Critically, gefitinib resulted in a selective and significant reduction of tumor cell migration in EGFR-amplified tumors. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide the first identification of patient-to-patient variation in tumor cell migration in living human tumor tissue. We found that EGFR-amplified GBM are inherently more efficient in their migration and can be effectively targeted by gefitinib treatment. These data suggest that stratified clinical trails are needed to evaluate gefitinib as an anti-invasive adjuvant for patients with EGFR-amplified GBM. In addition, these results provide proof of principle that primary slice cultures may be useful for patient-specific screening of agents designed to inhibit tumor invasion.
BACKGROUND: Tissue invasion is a hallmark of most humancancers and remains a major source of treatment failure in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Although EGFR amplification has been previously associated with more invasive tumor behavior, existing experimental models have not supported quantitative evaluation of interpatient differences in tumor cell migration or testing of patient-specific responses to therapies targeting invasion. To explore these questions, we optimized an ex vivo organotypic slice culture system allowing for labeling and tracking of tumor cells in human GBM slice cultures. METHODS: With use of time-lapse confocal microscopy of retrovirally labeled tumor cells in slices, baseline differences in migration speed and efficiency were determined and correlated with EGFR amplification in a cohort of patients with GBM. Slices were treated with gefitinib to evaluate anti-invasive effects associated with targeting EGFR. RESULTS: Migration analysis identified significant patient-to-patient variation at baseline. EGFR amplification was correlated with increased migration speed and efficiency compared with nonamplified tumors. Critically, gefitinib resulted in a selective and significant reduction of tumor cell migration in EGFR-amplified tumors. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide the first identification of patient-to-patient variation in tumor cell migration in living humantumor tissue. We found that EGFR-amplified GBM are inherently more efficient in their migration and can be effectively targeted by gefitinib treatment. These data suggest that stratified clinical trails are needed to evaluate gefitinib as an anti-invasive adjuvant for patients with EGFR-amplified GBM. In addition, these results provide proof of principle that primary slice cultures may be useful for patient-specific screening of agents designed to inhibit tumor invasion.
Authors: Ingo K Mellinghoff; Maria Y Wang; Igor Vivanco; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Shaojun Zhu; Ederlyn Q Dia; Kan V Lu; Koji Yoshimoto; Julie H Y Huang; Dennis J Chute; Bridget L Riggs; Steve Horvath; Linda M Liau; Webster K Cavenee; P Nagesh Rao; Rameen Beroukhim; Timothy C Peck; Jeffrey C Lee; William R Sellers; David Stokoe; Michael Prados; Timothy F Cloughesy; Charles L Sawyers; Paul S Mischel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeremy N Rich; David A Reardon; Terry Peery; Jeannette M Dowell; Jennifer A Quinn; Kara L Penne; Carol J Wikstrand; Lauren B Van Duyn; Janet E Dancey; Roger E McLendon; James C Kao; Timothy T Stenzel; B K Ahmed Rasheed; Sandra E Tourt-Uhlig; James E Herndon; James J Vredenburgh; John H Sampson; Allan H Friedman; Darell D Bigner; Henry S Friedman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-11-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yoshifumi Okada; Edward E Hurwitz; John M Esposito; Melissa A Brower; Catherine L Nutt; David N Louis Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: L E Gaspar; B J Fisher; D R Macdonald; D V LeBer; E C Halperin; S C Schold; J G Cairncross Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1992 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: S Palfi; K R Swanson; S De Boüard; F Chrétien; R Oliveira; R K Gherardi; J M Kros; M Peschanski; C Christov Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-08-16 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Kelly V Pinheiro; Amanda Thomaz; Bárbara Kunzler Souza; Victoria Anne Metcalfe; Natália Hogetop Freire; André Tesainer Brunetto; Caroline Brunetto de Farias; Mariane Jaeger; Victorio Bambini; Christopher G S Smith; Lisa Shaw; Rafael Roesler Journal: Mol Biol Rep Date: 2020-08-29 Impact factor: 2.316
Authors: Wenting Zhao; Athanassios Dovas; Eleonora Francesca Spinazzi; Hanna Mendes Levitin; Matei Alexandru Banu; Pavan Upadhyayula; Tejaswi Sudhakar; Tamara Marie; Marc L Otten; Michael B Sisti; Jeffrey N Bruce; Peter Canoll; Peter A Sims Journal: Genome Med Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Quan Zhou; Nynke S van den Berg; Eben L Rosenthal; Michael Iv; Michael Zhang; Johana C M Vega Leonel; Shannon Walters; Naoki Nishio; Monica Granucci; Roan Raymundo; Grace Yi; Hannes Vogel; Romain Cayrol; Yu-Jin Lee; Guolan Lu; Marisa Hom; Wenying Kang; Melanie Hayden Gephart; Larry Recht; Seema Nagpal; Reena Thomas; Chirag Patel; Gerald A Grant; Gordon Li Journal: Theranostics Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 11.556