Literature DB >> 23749344

Adherence to screening mammography among American Indian women of the Northern Plains.

Emily L Roen1, Marilyn A Roubidoux, Annette I Joe, Tina R Russell, Amr S Soliman.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is a burden for American Indian (AI) women who have younger age at diagnosis and higher stage of disease. Rural areas also have had less access to screening mammography. An Indian Health Service Mobile Women's Health Unit (MWHU) was implemented to improve mammogram screening of AI women in the Northern Plains. Our purpose was to determine the past adherence to screening mammography at a woman's first presentation to the MWHU for mammogram screening. Date of the most recent prior non-MWHU mammogram was obtained from mammography records. Adherence to screening guidelines was defined as the prior mammogram occurring 1-2 years before the first MWHU visit among women >41 years, and was the main outcome, whereas, age and clinic site were predictors. Adherence was compared with national data of the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC). Among 1,771 women >41 years, adherence to screening mammography guidelines was 48.01 % among >65 years, 42.05 % among 50-64 years, 33.43 % among 41-49 years, and varied with clinic site (25.23-65.93 %). Age (p < 0.0001) and clinic site (p < 0.0001) were associated with adherence. Overall, adherence to screening mammography guidelines was found in 39.86 % (706/1771) of MWHU women versus 74.34 % (747,095/1,004,943) of BCSC women. The majority (60.14 %) of women at first presentation to the MWHU had not had mammograms in the previous 2 years, lower screening adherence than nationally (25.66 %). Adherence was lowest among women ages 41-49, and varied with clinic site. Findings suggest disparities in mammography screening among these women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23749344      PMCID: PMC3760373          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2580-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  27 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Jini H Han
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database.

Authors:  R Ballard-Barbash; S H Taplin; B C Yankaskas; V L Ernster; R D Rosenberg; P A Carney; W E Barlow; B M Geller; K Kerlikowske; B K Edwards; C F Lynch; N Urban; C A Chrvala; C R Key; S P Poplack; J K Worden; L G Kessler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The role of race and residence in determining stage at diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  C H Amey; M K Miller; S L Albrecht
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  The relationship of HMOs, health insurance, and delivery systems to breast cancer outcomes.

Authors:  A Lee-Feldstein; P J Feldstein; T Buchmueller; G Katterhagen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The influence of urbanization, age, ethnicity, and income on the early diagnosis of breast carcinoma: opportunity for screening improvement.

Authors:  H R Menck; P K Mills
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up?

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; Laura Ichikawa; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; M Michele Manos; Ann M Geiger; Sheila Weinmann; Joyce Gilbert; Judy Mouchawar; Wendy A Leyden; Robin Altaras; Robert K Beverly; Deborah Casso; Emily Oakes Westbrook; Kimberly Bischoff; Jane G Zapka; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  The importance of place of residence in predicting late-stage diagnosis of breast or cervical cancer.

Authors:  Janis Barry; Nancy Breen
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.078

8.  Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer?

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti; Nicole Lurie; Linn Abraham; Rachel Ballard Barbash; Jodi Strzelczyk; Mark Dignan; William E Barlow; Cherry M Beasley; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Population-based mammography screening results in substantial savings in treatment costs for fatal breast cancer.

Authors:  Lea Kauhava; Pirjo Immonen-Räihä; Ilmo Parvinen; Kaija Holli; Pauliina Kronqvist; Liisa Pylkkänen; Hans Helenius; Anne Kaljonen; Osmo Räsänen; Pekka J Klemi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Differences in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival by race and ethnicity.

Authors:  Christopher I Li; Kathleen E Malone; Janet R Daling
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-13
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Mobile Mammography Services and Underserved Women.

Authors:  Usha Trivedi; Toma S Omofoye; Cindy Marquez; Callie R Sullivan; Diane M Benson; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-05

2.  Breast cancer literacy and health beliefs related to breast cancer screening among American Indian women.

Authors:  Soonhee Roh; Catherine E Burnette; Yeon-Shim Lee; Jung Sim Jun; Hee Yun Lee; Kyoung Hag Lee
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  2018-03-28

3.  Quantification of Potential Inequities in Breast Cancer Incidence in New Mexico Through Bayesian Disease Mapping.

Authors:  David Zahrieh; Michael A Golafshar; Samir H Patel; Todd A DeWees
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Suzanne Vang; Laurie R Margolies; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Mobile primary health care clinics for Indigenous populations in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Hannah Beks; Geraldine Ewing; James A Charles; Fiona Mitchell; Yin Paradies; Robyn A Clark; Vincent L Versace
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2020-11-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.