OBJECTIVE: We propose a non-invasive method for diagnosing post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH group 2). We evaluated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) by studying the left atrium (LA) on thoracic ECG-gated CT compared with right heart catheterisation (RHC). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 54 patients with suspected PH or followed for PH who underwent thoracic ECG-gated CT and RHC within 15 days. The diagnostic accuracy of CT morphological and functional data of the LA for the detection of PCWP >15 mmHg, evaluated by two independent readers, was assessed using correlation and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was high (r = 0.97-0.99). Correlations were found between PCWP and the morphological criteria of the LA such as anteroposterior diameter at 0 % of the R-R interval (r = 0.70, P ≤ 0.001) as well as at 40 % (r = 0.69, P ≤ 0.001). ROC curves constructed with a threshold value of PCWP > 15 mmHg showed an area under the curve between 0.88 and 0.91. Significant correlations were found between PCWP and functional criteria of the LA, including distensibility (r = -0.49, P ≤ 0.001) and ejection fraction (r = -0.58, P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thoracic ECG-gated CT in a PH workup helps distinguish between pre- and post-capillary PH. KEY POINTS: • Computed tomography may help differentiate the various types of pulmonary hypertension (PH). • Post-capillary PH group 2 is due to left heart disease. • Right heart catheterisation is used to separate pre- and post-capillary PH. • Left atrium anteroposterior diameter measured on CT is of value. • ECG-gated CT helps clinicians to assess patients with PH non-invasively.
OBJECTIVE: We propose a non-invasive method for diagnosing post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH group 2). We evaluated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) by studying the left atrium (LA) on thoracic ECG-gated CT compared with right heart catheterisation (RHC). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 54 patients with suspected PH or followed for PH who underwent thoracic ECG-gated CT and RHC within 15 days. The diagnostic accuracy of CT morphological and functional data of the LA for the detection of PCWP >15 mmHg, evaluated by two independent readers, was assessed using correlation and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was high (r = 0.97-0.99). Correlations were found between PCWP and the morphological criteria of the LA such as anteroposterior diameter at 0 % of the R-R interval (r = 0.70, P ≤ 0.001) as well as at 40 % (r = 0.69, P ≤ 0.001). ROC curves constructed with a threshold value of PCWP > 15 mmHg showed an area under the curve between 0.88 and 0.91. Significant correlations were found between PCWP and functional criteria of the LA, including distensibility (r = -0.49, P ≤ 0.001) and ejection fraction (r = -0.58, P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thoracic ECG-gated CT in a PH workup helps distinguish between pre- and post-capillary PH. KEY POINTS: • Computed tomography may help differentiate the various types of pulmonary hypertension (PH). • Post-capillary PH group 2 is due to left heart disease. • Right heart catheterisation is used to separate pre- and post-capillary PH. • Left atrium anteroposterior diameter measured on CT is of value. • ECG-gated CT helps clinicians to assess patients with PH non-invasively.
Authors: Micah R Fisher; Paul R Forfia; Elzbieta Chamera; Traci Housten-Harris; Hunter C Champion; Reda E Girgis; Mary C Corretti; Paul M Hassoun Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Olivier Ecabert; Jochen Peters; Hauke Schramm; Cristian Lorenz; Jens von Berg; Matthew J Walker; Mani Vembar; Mark E Olszewski; Krishna Subramanyan; Guy Lavi; Jürgen Weese Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Adrian C Borges; Fabian Knebel; Stephan Eddicks; Alexander Panda; Sebastian Schattke; Christian Witt; Gert Baumann Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2006-06-27 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Juan F Delgado; Esther Conde; Violeta Sánchez; Fernando López-Ríos; Miguel A Gómez-Sánchez; Pilar Escribano; Teresa Sotelo; Agustín Gómez de la Cámara; José Cortina; Carlos S de la Calzada Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Michael McGoon; David Gutterman; Virginia Steen; Robin Barst; Douglas C McCrory; Terry A Fortin; James E Loyd Journal: Chest Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Michael Pienn; Gabor Kovacs; Maria Tscherner; Alexander Avian; Thorsten R Johnson; Peter Kullnig; Rudolf Stollberger; Andrea Olschewski; Horst Olschewski; Zoltán Bálint Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Benjamin J Currie; Chris Johns; Matthew Chin; Thanos Charalampopolous; Charlie A Elliot; Pankaj Garg; Smitha Rajaram; Catherine Hill; Jim W Wild; Robin A Condliffe; David G Kiely; Andy J Swift Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2018-03-04 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: David G Kiely; David Levin; Paul Hassoun; David D Ivy; Pei-Ni Jone; Jumaa Bwika; Steven M Kawut; Jim Lordan; Angela Lungu; Jeremy Mazurek; Shahin Moledina; Horst Olschewski; Andrew Peacock; Goverdhan Dutt Puri; Farbod Rahaghi; Michal Schafer; Mark Schiebler; Nicholas Screaton; Merryn Tawhai; Edwin Jr Van Beek; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf; Rebecca R Vanderpool; John Wort; Lan Zhao; Jim Wild; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Andrew J Swift Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 3.017