Molecular analysis of parapoxvirus envelope genes was performed. Parapoxvirus DNA was detected in eight calves from eight farms in Iwate Prefecture, Japan, between April and September 2010. Seven of the detected viruses were identified as bovine papular stomatitis virus (BPSV) by sequencing, because their nucleotide identity was more than 96.8% similar compared with BPSV strain V660. Among them, two formed a subgroup, because their amplicons were digested with Xmn I (a marker for BPSV) and Hinc II and exhibited a T61C nucleotide substitution in the sequenced region. The remaining virus was pseudocowpox virus that had not been reported previously in Japan. Our results demonstrate the presence of a new BPSV variant in Japan with genetic variability in the envelope gene.
Molecular analysis of parapoxvirus envelope genes was performed. Parapoxvirus DNA was detected in eight calves from eight farms in Iwate Prefecture, Japan, between April and September 2010. Seven of the detected viruses were identified as bovine papular stomatitis virus (BPSV) by sequencing, because their nucleotide identity was more than 96.8% similar compared with BPSV strain V660. Among them, two formed a subgroup, because their amplicons were digested with Xmn I (a marker for BPSV) and Hinc II and exhibited a T61C nucleotide substitution in the sequenced region. The remaining virus was pseudocowpox virus that had not been reported previously in Japan. Our results demonstrate the presence of a new BPSV variant in Japan with genetic variability in the envelope gene.
Parapoxvirus infections are widespread in ruminants, usually inducing mild clinical symptoms
around the mouth or on the teats of affected animals [3]. These infections need to be differentiated from other serious diseases affecting
the oral cavity and skin, such as foot-and-mouth disease, as clinical symptoms are similar
[1, 6].Known parapoxviruses (family Poxviridae) include orf virus (ORFV), bovinepapular stomatitis virus (BPSV), pseudocowpox virus (PCPV) and parapoxvirus of red deer in New
Zealand (PVNZ) [12]. Parapoxviruses were formerly
classified based on natural host range, clinical symptoms and serology [13]; however, these criteria do not always reflect the molecular
characteristics of these viruses [8, 17].Amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), sequencing and restriction fragment length
polymorphism (RFLP) have been used for molecular characterization and classification of
parapoxviruses [7, 8]. These methods have made it practical to study the prevalence of parapoxvirusinfections in animals and to differentiate infections by other pathogens. Our aim was to
determine unique molecular features of parapoxviruses detected in calves between April and
September 2010 in Iwate Prefecture, Japan.Affected calves (n=14) were 2- to 10-month-old and found on eight farms (farms 1–8). Calves
presented with lesions (papule, erosion or ulcer) in the mucosa of the gingiva, lip, palate or
tongue and in rare cases, excess salivation. No lesions were observed on teats or in the
interdigital cleft of limbs. Clinical signs also included mild pyrexia (39.6–39.9°C) in three
calves. Swab samples (n=10) were collected from mucosal lesions of eight affected calves and
from the gingival mucosa of two calves without clinical symptoms that had been housed near
calves with clinical signs. There were no obvious differences among the clinical features
found in 14 affected calves. The eight farms were scattered throughout the prefecture,
although two farms (farms 6 and 7) were located in the same town. There was no direct contact
among the cattle and/or people between each farm.PCR, RFLP, sequencing and phylogenetic analyses were performed on the swab samples [7, 8]. Viral DNA was
extracted with a QIAampDNA Minikit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan), followed by PCR with primers (PPP-1
and PPP-4) [7] to amplify partial nucleotide sequences
(594 bp) of the envelope gene. RFLPs were conducted with Drd I (marker for
ORFV), Xmn I (marker for BPSV), PflM I (marker for PCPV) or
Hinc II (marker for PVNZ). Following direct nucleotide sequencing, the
deduced amino acid sequences were aligned, and phylogenetic analysis was performed using the
Maximum Likelihood Method. Phylogenetic trees were constructed with the assistance of MEGA5
software. Nucleotide and amino acid sequences obtained were compared with each other with BPSV
(V660; GenBank Accession No. AB044793), PCPV (VR634; AB044792) and PVNZ (DPV; AB044794)
reference strains [7, 8] and with BPSV 9108 (JN162119) [2] and BPSV
Iwate/bovine/2007 (AB538385) [15]. For detailed
phylogenetic analyses, sequences of 12 previously reported virus isolates from Japan [8] and other countries [2] were used (AB044795–AB044801, JN171854, JN171860, JN171861, JN191576 and
AY386265).Virus isolation was performed from 10 swab samples as described above. Each sample was mixed
with Eagle’s minimal essential media (MEM) and then centrifuged for 30 min at 2,500 ×
g. The supernatant was inoculated onto bovine testis (BT) cells. The
inoculated cultures were observed daily for at least seven days after inoculation. Cultures
with no observable cytopathic effect (CPE) were passaged twice more in a blinded manner. After
the virus was isolated, we performed PCR amplification of the envelope gene followed by RFLP
as described above.Parapoxvirus DNA was detected from eight swab samples (A–H) from six affected calves (farms
1–4, 6 and 8) and two calves without clinical symptoms (farms 5 and 7). Five amplicons (A–E)
were cut with Xmn I only (496 and 98 bp fragments), and amplicon H was cut
with PflM I (443 and 151 bp). Amplicons F and G were digested by both
Xmn I (496 and 98 bp) and Hinc II (516 and 78 bp) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
RFLP analysis of eight amplicons. Restriction endonucleases used were
Drd I, Xmn I, PflM I and
Hinc II. Amplicons A–E and H were digested with Xmn
I and PflM I, respectively. Amplicons F and G were digested with
Xmn I and Hinc II. Lane M, 100 bp DNA ladder; A–H,
digested PCR products; N, undigested amplicon (594 bp).
RFLP analysis of eight amplicons. Restriction endonucleases used were
Drd I, Xmn I, PflM I and
Hinc II. Amplicons A–E and H were digested with Xmn
I and PflM I, respectively. Amplicons F and G were digested with
Xmn I and Hinc II. Lane M, 100 bp DNA ladder; A–H,
digested PCR products; N, undigested amplicon (594 bp).Nucleotide sequences of the PCR products and parapoxvirus reference strains are shown in
Table 1. Two amplicons (E and G) were derived from two calves without clinical symptoms.
Because the nucleotide sequences of these two amplicons were different from those of the other
6 amplicons that were derived from calves with clinical symptoms, we ruled out the possibility
of contamination.
Table 1.
Percent nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence identities for partial regions
of the viral envelope
PCR products
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
BPSV
PCPV
PVNZ
Nucleotide sequence identities (%)
A
99.6
100
99.6
98.9
96.6
97.1
85.7
98.9
84.8
86.1
B
100
99.6
99.3
98.9
96.6
97.1
85.7
98.9
84.8
86.1
C
100
100
99.6
98.9
96.6
97.1
85.7
98.9
84.8
86.1
D
100
100
100
98.9
96.6
97.1
85.7
98.9
84.8
86.1
E
100
100
100
100
96.8
97.1
85.9
98.9
85.0
86.8
F
96.2
96.2
96.2
96.2
96.2
99.5
85.4
96.8
84.5
86.1
G
96.7
96.7
96.7
96.7
96.7
99.5
85.9
97.1
85.0
86.5
H
83.7
83.7
83.7
83.7
83.7
83.7
84.2
85.4
98.6
83.6
BPSV
100
100
100
100
100
96.2
96.7
83.7
84.5
86.5
PCPV
82.6
82.6
82.6
82.6
82.6
82.6
83.2
98.9
82.6
83.2
PVNV
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.4
85.3
85.9
81.5
86.4
81.5
Amino acid sequence identities (%)
A to H, sequenced amplicons in this study; BPSV, bovine papular stomatitis virus strain
V660; PCPV, pseudocowpox virus strain VR634; PVNZ, parapoxvirus of red deer in New
Zealand strain DPV.
A to H, sequenced amplicons in this study; BPSV, bovine papular stomatitis virus strain
V660; PCPV, pseudocowpox virus strain VR634; PVNZ, parapoxvirus of red deer in New
Zealand strain DPV.The location of the Xmn I site was conserved in BPSV V660,
Iwate/bovine/2007, 7 of the amplicons identified in this study (A–F) and BPSV 9108 (Fig. 2). The Hinc II site in F and G was located upstream of the
Xmn I site, because of the T61C nucleotide substitution. This substitution
was also present in BPSV 9108. In the deduced amino acid sequences for F and G, the presence
of an I301V substitution has the potential to confer a change in antigenicity. Generally, the
virus envelope antigen is highly variable, because of its exposure to host immunological
pressures. These substitutions might be the result of exposure to some as yet unidentified
immunological pressures. The nucleotide sequence of amplicon B was identical to that of BPSV
Iwate/bovine/2007 detected in a calf from Iwate Prefecture in 2007 [15]. Based on the phylogenetic tree we constructed, seven of the detected
amplicons (A–G) could be considered BPSV; however, the sequence of amplicon H was most similar
to that of PCPV (Fig. 3). Within the larger cluster, F and G formed a subgroup along with BPSV 9108. The
nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence identities for the amplicons and parapoxvirus
reference sequences are shown in Table 1.
Fig. 2.
Nucleotide sequence alignment of partial regions of the envelope gene. Nucleotides
identical to BPSV are represented by dots. A–H, sequenced amplicons; BPSV, bovine
papular stomatitis virus strain V660; Iwate/bovine/2007, BPSV strain Iwate/bovine/2007;
9108, BPSV strain 9108 strain; PCPV, pseudocowpox virus strain VR634; PVNZ, parapoxvirus
of red deer in New Zealand strain DPV.
Fig. 3.
Phylogenetic tree derived from the deduced amino acid sequences of partial envelope
gene regions. A–H, sequenced amplicons; V660, BPSV strain V660; VR634, pseudocowpox
virus strain VR634; DPV, parapoxvirus of red deer in New Zealand strain DPV; others,
isolates from Japan and other countries.
Nucleotide sequence alignment of partial regions of the envelope gene. Nucleotides
identical to BPSV are represented by dots. A–H, sequenced amplicons; BPSV, bovinepapular stomatitis virus strain V660; Iwate/bovine/2007, BPSV strain Iwate/bovine/2007;
9108, BPSV strain 9108 strain; PCPV, pseudocowpox virus strain VR634; PVNZ, parapoxvirus
of red deer in New Zealand strain DPV.Phylogenetic tree derived from the deduced amino acid sequences of partial envelope
gene regions. A–H, sequenced amplicons; V660, BPSV strain V660; VR634, pseudocowpox
virus strain VR634; DPV, parapoxvirus of red deer in New Zealand strain DPV; others,
isolates from Japan and other countries.Three swabs from three calves (farms 1, 2 and 6) showed CPE in BT cell cultures after a
second blind passage. Other swabs showed no signs of CPE. The molecular characteristics of
three isolates were identical to those of amplicons (A, B and F) from the swab of the same
calves.Parapoxvirus envelope genes were detected in eight calves from eight farms. Six of these
calves were symptomatic, and two were asymptomatic. Because the asymptomatic calves had been
raised with one symptomatic calf at each farm, the calves might have been subclinically
infected with the virus. Parapoxvirus infections with clinical symptoms in cattle have rarely
been reported in this prefecture [15], although a high
rate of antibodies positive against parapoxvirus has been found [14]. The increase in the level of detection is likely a consequence of
increased surveillance by veterinarians and farmers following a foot-and-mouth disease
outbreak in the spring of 2010 in Japan. This would suggest that parapoxvirus infections are
widespread among cattle in Iwate. Infections occur irrespective of age with relapses common,
because infections confer no significant immunity [5].
However, clinical symptoms were only observed in calves from 2- to 10-month-old. This finding
is in accordance with a previous report that found that infections were more common in calves
than adult cattle [5].Five (A–E) of the eight samples examined in our study were classified as BPSV, based on amino
acid identities with the corresponding regions in BPSV V660 [8]. In particular, amplicon B showed 100% nucleotide identity to the amplicon from
Iwate/bovine/2007, in spite of being isolated in different years. This strongly suggests that
this examined region encoding an envelope protein is highly conserved. By contrast, the
presence of BPSV, which can be digested with Xmn I and Hinc
II, was also indicated in this study. It was reported that BPSV 9108, isolated from a calf in
France, contained a greater number of nucleotide substitutions in the envelope genes compared
with other BPSV species [2]. Our phylogenetic analysis
indicated that the French isolate could be grouped together with samples F and G (Fig. 3) and contained the same substitution at
nucleotide 61 (Fig. 2). Our results also suggest
that BPSV demonstrates a certain level of variability. Although there is no direct
epidemiological evidence, these results suggest that BPSV variants are likely widespread among
cattle in Japan.Sample H was grouped with PCPV, based on RFLP results, nucleotide and amino acid identities
and phylogenetic analysis. This is the first report describing PCPV in Japan. It was detected
from the lesion around the mouth, not on the teats. The present result indicates that disease
names are not always coincident with causal viral names in parapoxvirus infections as
previously reported [8,9,10, 17]. PCPV VR634 was isolated from a human in the U.S.A. that had “milker’s nodules”
on the hands [4]. The high level of identity between
sample H and PCPV VR634, whose origins are significantly different geographically,
biologically and chronologically, is indicative of high levels of conservation in the envelope
gene region we examined.Recently, several case reports have highlighted the presence and wide distribution of
parapoxvirus infections in cattle [9,10,11, 16]. Further molecular studies of parapoxviruses
circulating among field animals are needed to clarify their epidemiology and pathogenesis.
Authors: Maria K Tikkanen; Colin J McInnes; Andrew A Mercer; Mathias Büttner; Jarno Tuimala; Varpu Hirvelä-Koski; Erkki Neuvonen; Anita Huovilainen Journal: J Gen Virol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 3.891
Authors: A MacNeil; E Lederman; M G Reynolds; N J Ragade; R Talken; D Friedman; W Hall; T Shwe; Y Li; H Zhao; S Smith; W Davidson; C Hughes; I K Damon Journal: Zoonoses Public Health Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.702
Authors: Juan F Micheloud; Laura S Aguirre; Gabriela V Sandoval; Agustín Avellaneda-Cáceres; Julian Diodati; Andrea Peralta Journal: Trop Anim Health Prod Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 1.893