Tom Sterud1. 1. Department of Occupational Health Surveillance, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The overall evidence for work-related mechanical exposures as risk factors for long-term sick leave (LTSL) in the general working population is limited. METHODS: The study cohort was randomly drawn from the general population in Norway, aged 18-69 years (n = 12 255, response at baseline = 60.9%). Eligible respondents were interviewed in 2009 and were registered with an active employee relationship of at least 100 actual working days in 2009 and 2010 (n = 6758). The outcome of interest was medically confirmed LTSL ≥40 working days during 2010. RESULTS: In total, 9.4% (635 individuals) were classified with LTSL during 2010. The risk of LTSL was higher in women, employees with fewer years of education, regular smokers, employees with chronic health complaints and employees with LTSL during 2009. After adjusting for these factors, we estimated that 24.6% of LTSL cases were attributable to work-related mechanical exposure. Mechanical risk factors were neck flexion, hand/arm repetition, standing, working with upper body bent forward and awkward lifting. The odds ratio for highest exposure levels ranged from 1.32 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.69) for standing to 2.15 (95% confidence interval 1.24-3.73) for awkward lifting. A test for trend was statistically significant for all contributing factors (P ≤ 0.05), except standing. No psychosocial factors acted as major confounders related to any of the mechanical risk factors. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the importance of work-related mechanical exposures as risk factors for LTSL in the general working population. An exposure-response relationship was indicated for 5 of the 10 factors evaluated.
BACKGROUND: The overall evidence for work-related mechanical exposures as risk factors for long-term sick leave (LTSL) in the general working population is limited. METHODS: The study cohort was randomly drawn from the general population in Norway, aged 18-69 years (n = 12 255, response at baseline = 60.9%). Eligible respondents were interviewed in 2009 and were registered with an active employee relationship of at least 100 actual working days in 2009 and 2010 (n = 6758). The outcome of interest was medically confirmed LTSL ≥40 working days during 2010. RESULTS: In total, 9.4% (635 individuals) were classified with LTSL during 2010. The risk of LTSL was higher in women, employees with fewer years of education, regular smokers, employees with chronic health complaints and employees with LTSL during 2009. After adjusting for these factors, we estimated that 24.6% of LTSL cases were attributable to work-related mechanical exposure. Mechanical risk factors were neck flexion, hand/arm repetition, standing, working with upper body bent forward and awkward lifting. The odds ratio for highest exposure levels ranged from 1.32 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.69) for standing to 2.15 (95% confidence interval 1.24-3.73) for awkward lifting. A test for trend was statistically significant for all contributing factors (P ≤ 0.05), except standing. No psychosocial factors acted as major confounders related to any of the mechanical risk factors. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the importance of work-related mechanical exposures as risk factors for LTSL in the general working population. An exposure-response relationship was indicated for 5 of the 10 factors evaluated.
Authors: Cecilie Aagestad; Reidar Tyssen; Håkon A Johannessen; Hans Magne Gravseth; Tore Tynes; Tom Sterud Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Stef Bouwhuis; Anne Helene Garde; Goedele A Geuskens; Cécile R L Boot; Paulien M Bongers; Allard J van der Beek Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Emil Sundstrup; Åse Marie Hansen; Erik Lykke Mortensen; Otto Melchior Poulsen; Thomas Clausen; Reiner Rugulies; Anne Møller; Lars L Andersen Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Therese N Hanvold; Petter Kristensen; Karina Corbett; Rachel L Hasting; Ingrid S Mehlum Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Emil Sundstrup; Åse Marie Hansen; Erik Lykke Mortensen; Otto Melchior Poulsen; Thomas Clausen; Reiner Rugulies; Anne Møller; Lars Louis Andersen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 3.295