Literature DB >> 23748393

Miscommunication between patients and general practitioners: implications for clinical practice.

Sonya Morgan1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Effective communication is integral to the general practice consultation, yet it is acknowledged that problems commonly occur. Previous research has shown that misunderstandings with potentially significant consequences occur frequently, but does not provide a clear picture of how and why miscommunication occurs, or how such problems can be prevented or resolved. This study explored the occurrence and management of specific examples of miscommunication in two routine general practice consultations.
METHODS: A multi-method case study approach was used. The primary data collected for each case included a video-recorded consultation and post-consultation interviews with each general practitioner (GP) and patient. Instances of communication mismatch were examined using in-depth interaction analysis techniques.
FINDINGS: GPs and patients may not be aware when misunderstandings have occurred. In-depth analysis of the case studies revealed the complexity of miscommunication: it was not a straightforward matter to locate when or why instances of communication mismatch had occurred, and each of the mismatches was quite distinctive: (1) they were identified in different ways; (2) they occurred at different points in the communication process; (3) they arose because of problems occurring at different levels of the communication, and (4) they had different consequences.
CONCLUSION: Given the frequency and complexity of miscommunication in general practice consultations, GPs need to consider adopting various strategies, at both the practice/systems level and the level of the consultation interaction to minimise the risk of communication problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23748393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 1172-6156


  5 in total

1.  Closing evidence to practice gaps: an end to an attack of the vapours?

Authors:  Anthony C Dowell; Nikki Turner
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?

Authors:  Jorge L Perez; Zachary A Mosher; Shawna L Watson; Evan D Sheppard; Eugene W Brabston; Gerald McGwin; Brent A Ponce
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Perception Versus Reality: The Use of Teach Back by Medical Residents.

Authors:  Iris Feinberg; Michelle M Ogrodnick; Robert C Hendrick; Kimberly Bates; Kevin Johnson; Bingyan Wang
Journal:  Health Lit Res Pract       Date:  2019-07-01

4.  Acceptability of text messages for safety netting patients with low-risk cancer symptoms: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Yasemin Hirst; Anita Wey Wey Lim
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Communication in high risk ante-natal consultations: a direct observational study of interactions between patients and obstetricians.

Authors:  Jo Hilder; Maria Stubbe; Lindsay Macdonald; Peter Abels; Anthony C Dowell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.