RATIONALE: Problematic drug use is associated with difficulty in exerting self-control over behaviors, and this difficulty may be a consequence of atypical morphometric characteristics that are exhibited by drug-experienced individuals. The extent to which these structural abnormalities result from drug use or reflect neurobiological risk factors that predate drug use, however, is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine how methamphetamine affects corticostriatal structure and how drug-induced changes relate to alterations in inhibitory control. METHODS: Structural magnetic resonance images and positron emission tomography (PET) scans, assessing dopamine D₂-like receptor and transporter availability, were acquired in monkeys trained to acquire, retain, and reverse three-choice visual discrimination problems before and after exposure to an escalating dose regimen of methamphetamine (or saline, as a control). Voxel-based morphometry was used to compare changes in corticostriatal gray matter between methamphetamine- and saline-exposed monkeys. The change in gray matter before and after the dosing regimen was compared to the change in the behavioral performance and in dopaminergic markers measured with PET. RESULTS: Methamphetamine exposure, compared to saline, increased gray matter within the right putamen. These changes were positively correlated with changes in performance of methamphetamine-exposed monkeys in the reversal phase, and were negatively correlated with alterations in D₂-like receptor and DAT availability. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide the first evidence that exposure to a methamphetamine dosing regimen that resembles human use alters the structural integrity of the striatum and that gray-matter abnormalities detected in human methamphetamine users are due, at least in part, to the pharmacological effects of drug experience.
RATIONALE: Problematic drug use is associated with difficulty in exerting self-control over behaviors, and this difficulty may be a consequence of atypical morphometric characteristics that are exhibited by drug-experienced individuals. The extent to which these structural abnormalities result from drug use or reflect neurobiological risk factors that predate drug use, however, is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine how methamphetamine affects corticostriatal structure and how drug-induced changes relate to alterations in inhibitory control. METHODS: Structural magnetic resonance images and positron emission tomography (PET) scans, assessing dopamine D₂-like receptor and transporter availability, were acquired in monkeys trained to acquire, retain, and reverse three-choice visual discrimination problems before and after exposure to an escalating dose regimen of methamphetamine (or saline, as a control). Voxel-based morphometry was used to compare changes in corticostriatal gray matter between methamphetamine- and saline-exposed monkeys. The change in gray matter before and after the dosing regimen was compared to the change in the behavioral performance and in dopaminergic markers measured with PET. RESULTS:Methamphetamine exposure, compared to saline, increased gray matter within the right putamen. These changes were positively correlated with changes in performance of methamphetamine-exposed monkeys in the reversal phase, and were negatively correlated with alterations in D₂-like receptor and DAT availability. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide the first evidence that exposure to a methamphetamine dosing regimen that resembles human use alters the structural integrity of the striatum and that gray-matter abnormalities detected in humanmethamphetamine users are due, at least in part, to the pharmacological effects of drug experience.
Authors: Michael A Nader; Drake Morgan; H Donald Gage; Susan H Nader; Tonya L Calhoun; Nancy Buchheimer; Richard Ehrenkaufer; Robert H Mach Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2006-07-09 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: James M Stone; Sagnik Bhattacharyya; Gareth J Barker; Philip K McGuire Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Anouk Schrantee; Lena Václavů; Dennis F R Heijtel; Matthan W A Caan; Willy Gsell; Paul J Lucassen; Aart J Nederveen; Jan Booij; Liesbeth Reneman Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Stephanie M Groman; Alex S James; Emanuele Seu; Steven Tran; Taylor A Clark; Sandra N Harpster; Maverick Crawford; Joanna Lee Burtner; Karen Feiler; Robert H Roth; John D Elsworth; Edythe D London; James David Jentsch Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Susan E Martelle; Susan H Nader; Paul W Czoty; William S John; Angela N Duke; Pradeep K Garg; Sudha Garg; Amy H Newman; Michael A Nader Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Christopher T Smith; Deanna L Wallace; Linh C Dang; Esther Aarts; William J Jagust; Mark D'Esposito; Charlotte A Boettiger Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 2.714