Literature DB >> 23747838

Second-phase validation study of short time exposure test for assessment of eye irritation potency of chemicals.

Hajime Kojima1, Kazuhiko Hayashi, Hitoshi Sakaguchi, Takashi Omori, Takuya Otoizumi, Takashi Sozu, Hirofumi Kuwahara, Takumi Hayashi, Mayumi Sakaguchi, Akemi Toyoda, Haruka Goto, Shinichi Watanabe, Kyoko Ahiko, Tsuneaki Nakamura, Takashi Morimoto.   

Abstract

A Short Time Exposure (STE) test is a cytotoxicity test that uses SIRC cells (rabbit corneal cell line) to assess eye irritation potency following a 5-min chemical exposure. This second-phase validation study assessed the predictive capacity of the STE test using 40 coded test substances at three laboratories. A Validation Management Team (VMT) then evaluated the predictivity of the STE test for United Nation (UN) Globally Harmonized System (GHS) categories using 63 test substances including the results of the first-phase validation study. The STE test can assess not only the severe or corrosive ocular irritants (corresponding to the UN GHS Category 1) but also non-irritant (corresponding to UN GHS Non Category) from other toxicity classes, especially for limited types of test substances. The predictivity by STE test, however, was insufficient for identification of UN GHS categories (Category 1, Category 2, or Non Category). These results suggest that the STE test can be recommended as an initial step in a top-down approach to identification of severe irritants and test substances that require classification for eye irritation (UN GHS Category 1) as well as an initial step in a bottom-up approach to identification of test substances that do not require classification for eye irritation (UN GHS Non Category) from other toxicity classes, especially for limited types of test substances. On the other hand, the STE test is not considered adequate for the identification of mild or moderate irritants (i.e., UN GHS Categories 2A and 2B) and severe irritants (UN GHS Category 1).
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative method; Eye irritation; GHS; SIRC cells; STE; Validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23747838     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  3 in total

Review 1.  Same-chemical comparison of nonanimal eye irritation test methods: Bovine corneal opacity and permeability, EpiOcular™, isolated chicken eye, ocular Irritection®, OptiSafe™, and short time exposure.

Authors:  Stewart Lebrun; Linda Nguyen; Sara Chavez; Roxanne Chan; Debby Le; Minh Nguyen; James V Jester
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 2.  Alternatives to In Vivo Draize Rabbit Eye and Skin Irritation Tests with a Focus on 3D Reconstructed Human Cornea-Like Epithelium and Epidermis Models.

Authors:  Miri Lee; Jee-Hyun Hwang; Kyung-Min Lim
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2017-07-15

Review 3.  Cosmetics Europe compilation of historical serious eye damage/eye irritation in vivo data analysed by drivers of classification to support the selection of chemicals for development and evaluation of alternative methods/strategies: the Draize eye test Reference Database (DRD).

Authors:  João Barroso; Uwe Pfannenbecker; Els Adriaens; Nathalie Alépée; Magalie Cluzel; Ann De Smedt; Jalila Hibatallah; Martina Klaric; Karsten R Mewes; Marion Millet; Marie Templier; Pauline McNamee
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.153

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.