Literature DB >> 23747800

Rhipicephalus microplus lipocalins (LRMs): genomic identification and analysis of the bovine immune response using in silico predicted B and T cell epitopes.

Manuel Rodriguez-Valle1, Paula Moolhuijzen, Emily K Piper, Olivia Weiss, Megan Vance, Matthew Bellgard, Ala Lew-Tabor.   

Abstract

The attachment to host skin by Rhipicephalus microplus larvae induces a series of physiological events at the attachment site. The host-parasite interaction might induce a rejection of the larvae, as is frequently observed in Bos taurus indicus cattle, and under certain conditions in Bos taurus taurus cattle. Ticks deactivate the host rejection response by secreting specific proteins and lipids that play an essential role in manipulation of the host immune response. The available genomic information on the R. microplus tick was mined using bioinformatics approaches to identify R. microplus lipocalins (LRMs). This in silico examination revealed a total of 12 different putative R. microplus LRMs (LRM1-LRM12). The identity of the LRM family showed high sequence variability: from 6% between LRM7 and LRM8 to 55.9% between LRM2 and LRM6. However, the three-dimensional structure of the lipocalin family was conserved in the LRMs. The B and T cell epitopes in these lipocalins were then predicted, and six of the LRMs (5, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12) were used to examine the host immune interactions with sera and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected from tick-susceptible and tick-resistant cattle challenged with R. microplus. On days 28-60 after tick infestation, the anti-LRM titres were higher in the resistant group compared with the susceptible cattle. After 60 day, the anti-LRM titres (except LRM9 and LRM11) decreased to zero in the sera of both the tick-resistant and tick-susceptible cattle. Using cell proliferation assays, the PBMCs challenged with some of the predicted T cell epitopes (LRM1_T1, T2; LRM_T1, T2 and LRM12_T) exhibited a significantly higher number of IFN-γ-secreting cells (Th1) in tick-susceptible Holstein-Friesians compared with tick-resistant Brahman cattle. In contrast, expression of the Th2 cytokine (IL-4) was lower in Holstein-Friesians cattle compared with Brahman cattle. Moreover, this study found that LRM6, LRM9 and LRM11 play important roles in the mechanism by which R. microplus interferes with the host's haemostasis mechanisms.
Copyright © 2013 Australian Society for Parasitology Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B and T cell epitopes; Histamine binding protein; Lipocalin; Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23747800     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Parasitol        ISSN: 0020-7519            Impact factor:   3.981


  10 in total

1.  Ticks from diverse genera encode chemokine-inhibitory evasin proteins.

Authors:  Jenni Hayward; Julie Sanchez; Andrew Perry; Cheng Huang; Manuel Rodriguez Valle; Meritxell Canals; Richard J Payne; Martin J Stone
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Cellular response in the tick feeding site in crossbred cattle artificially infested by Rhipicephalus microplus.

Authors:  Jair Rodini Engracia Filho; Chiara Domingues Araújo; Gabriela Nishihara Pinto; Yann Henrique Mendes; Gervasio Henrique Bechara
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Rhipicephalus microplus serine protease inhibitor family: annotation, expression and functional characterisation assessment.

Authors:  Manuel Rodriguez-Valle; Tao Xu; Sebastian Kurscheid; Ala E Lew-Tabor
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Proteomic analysis of cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus saliva: a comparison between partially and fully engorged females.

Authors:  Lucas Tirloni; José Reck; Renata Maria Soares Terra; João Ricardo Martins; Albert Mulenga; Nicholas E Sherman; Jay W Fox; John R Yates; Carlos Termignoni; Antônio F M Pinto; Itabajara da Silva Vaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Cattle Tick Rhipicephalus microplus-Host Interface: A Review of Resistant and Susceptible Host Responses.

Authors:  Ala E Tabor; Abid Ali; Gauhar Rehman; Gustavo Rocha Garcia; Amanda Fonseca Zangirolamo; Thiago Malardo; Nicholas N Jonsson
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 6.  An Introduction to B-Cell Epitope Mapping and In Silico Epitope Prediction.

Authors:  Lenka Potocnakova; Mangesh Bhide; Lucia Borszekova Pulzova
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 4.818

7.  RNA-seq analysis of the salivary glands and midgut of the Argasid tick Ornithodoros rostratus.

Authors:  Ricardo N Araujo; Naylene C S Silva; Antonio Mendes-Sousa; Rafaela Paim; Gabriel C A Costa; Luciana R Dias; Karla Oliveira; Mauricio R V Sant'Anna; Nelder F Gontijo; Marcos H Pereira; Grasielle D Pessoa; Jesus G Valenzuela; Leonardo B Koerich; Fabiano Oliveira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Infection Alters the Sialome of Ixodes ricinus Ticks During the Earliest Stages of Feeding.

Authors:  Charles E Hart; Jose M Ribeiro; Maria Kazimirova; Saravanan Thangamani
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  Are ticks venomous animals?

Authors:  Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz; James J Valdés
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 10.  Gene Duplication and Protein Evolution in Tick-Host Interactions.

Authors:  Ben J Mans; Jonathan Featherston; Minique H de Castro; Ronel Pienaar
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.