Literature DB >> 23747154

An examination of data confidentiality and disclosure issues related to publication of empirical ROC curves.

Gregory J Matthews1, Ofer Harel.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Grant funding institutions often require organizations to share their collected data as widely as possible while safeguarding the privacy of individuals. Summaries based on these data are often released. Here, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is explored for potential statistical disclosures in the presence of auxiliary data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Formulas are introduced for calculating the missing data points from the full data set, given that a user has an empirical ROC curve and a subset of the data used to generate such a curve. Further, a discussion of the plausibility of this scenario is presented.
RESULTS: Diagnostic test data were simulated and an ROC curve was produced. Using a subset of the true data and the points on the empirical ROC curve, an attempt was made to reproduce the missing parts of the data. Disease statuses were able to be determined exactly, whereas test scores were solved for up to their rank.
CONCLUSIONS: If an individual or organization possessed the points of an empirical ROC curve and a subset of the true data, the true data underlying the ROC curve can be reproduced relatively accurately. As a result, the release of summaries of data, including the ROC curve, must be given careful thought before their release from a statistical disclosure perspective.
Copyright © 2013 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23747154      PMCID: PMC3771093          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  7 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  The case for samples of anonymized records from the 1991 census.

Authors:  C Marsh; C Skinner; S Arber; B Penhale; S Openshaw; J Hobcraft; D Lievesley; N Walford
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.483

3.  The HIPAA privacy rule and protected health information: implications in research involving DICOM image databases.

Authors:  David T Fetzer; O Clark West
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  HIPAA privacy and DICOM anonymization for research.

Authors:  David Avrin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Core curriculum: research ethics for radiology residents.

Authors:  Jocelyn Chertoff; Etta Pisano; Bernard Gert
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Communicating results directly to patients: don't ignore the price tag of this added "value".

Authors:  Saurabh Jha
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Direct reporting of results to patients: the future of radiology?

Authors:  Melanie Kuhlman; Monique Meyer; Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.173

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.