Literature DB >> 23747144

Consequences of the implementation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease system for liver allocation in Brazil.

R C Pestana1, E I Baracat, P C B Massarollo, L A Pereira, L A Szutan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In July 2006, the system for liver allocation in Brazil started to rely on the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scale, replacing the previous chronological criteria. Under the new system, the score for listing pediatric patients is obtained by multiplication of the calculated PELD score by 3. The current criteria also features extra points for diseases such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study sought to analyze the consequences of implementation of the MELD system on waiting list mortality, posttransplant survival rates and characteristics of the transplanted patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied data from the State Health Secretariat of São Paulo, regarding all patients registered on the waiting list for liver transplantation in the State of São Paulo, in two periods: July 2005 to July 2006 (pre-MELD era) and July 2006 to July 2010 (MELD era). Patient survival rates calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method were compared by the log-rank test. P values <.05 were considered statistically relevant.
RESULTS: After implementation of the MELD, waiting list registrations decreased by 39.8%; the percentage of transplants in HCC recipients increased from 2.4% to 23.7%; pediatric transplants increased from 6.5% to 9.3%; deaths on the list fell from 599 in the pre-MELD era to 359 in the last year analyzed; recipients with higher MELD displayed significantly lower posttransplant survival rates; HCC patients, better survival after transplantation (P = .002); No difference was observed comparing survival rates between pre-MELD and MELD eras (P = 474) or between adults and children (P = .867).
CONCLUSION: Under the MELD system for liver allocation in Brazil, there was a reduction in waiting list mortality and an increased number of transplantations in pediatric and HCC recipients. Survival rates of patients with higher MELD score were inferior. However, this result was offset by the greater survival in HCC recipients, with no difference in patient survival rates between the pre-MELD and MELD eras.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23747144     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  3 in total

1.  Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Hepatic Venous Outflow and Renal Function after Conventional versus Piggyback Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Marília D'Elboux Guimarães Brescia; Paulo Celso Bosco Massarollo; Ernesto Sasaki Imakuma; Sérgio Mies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Modelling kidney outcomes based on MELD eras - impact of MELD score in renal endpoints after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Paulo Ricardo Gessolo Lins; Roberto Camargo Narciso; Leonardo Rolim Ferraz; Virgilio Gonçalves Pereira; Ben-Hur Ferraz-Neto; Marcio Dias De Almeida; Bento Fortunato Cardoso Dos Santos; Oscar Fernando Pavão Dos Santos; Júlio Cesar Martins Monte; Marcelino Souza Durão Júnior; Marcelo Costa Batista
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 2.585

3.  Assessment and enrolment process for liver transplantation: nursing management through quality indicators.

Authors:  Fabíola Faustino de Machado Dias; Samira Scalso de Almeida; Marcio Dias de Almeida
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-04-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.