Literature DB >> 23746715

ERG protein expression and gene rearrangements are present at lower rates in metastatic and locally advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer compared to localized disease.

Liang-Hong Teng1, Cheng Wang, Louis R Bégin, Michael Dolph, Asli Yilmaz, Kiril Trpkov, Bryan Donnelly, Tarek A Bismar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare ERG expression and gene rearrangements rates in metastatic and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) to localized disease as ERG is the most common genetic event in early prostate cancer (PCa) with potential prognostic and therapeutic implications.
METHODS: We evaluated ERG protein expression in 344 patients with PCa in 3 cohorts including localized, metastatic, and castration-resistant disease using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
RESULTS: ERG protein expression was detected exclusively in the neoplastic epithelium and was found in 6.8% and 46.3% of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and localized PCa, respectively. In metastatic and locally advanced CRPC, ERG expression was significantly lower, occurring at 36.1% and 37.2%, respectively. In PCa with foamy gland morphology, ERG protein expression was detected in only 18.6% compared with reported rates of about 42%-48% in acinar PCa. Moreover, ERG protein expression and gene rearrangements showed an overall consistency rate of 90.6% (P <.0001). The consistency rate was 100% both in benign glands and HGPIN, and 96.1% in localized PCa. However, it was significantly lower at 76.9% and 85% in node metastatic and CRPC, respectively (P <.0001).
CONCLUSION: ERG protein expression is restricted to neoplastic prostatic epithelium and is present at lower rates in metastatic and CRPC compared to localized PCa. IHC and FISH concordance rates were significantly lower in node metastatic and CRPC compared to localized PCa, which may suggest different biological and therapeutic implications. The lower rate of ERG protein expression in foamy gland PCa may suggest potential differences for this pattern of PCa at the molecular level.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23746715     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  12 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of prostate cancer in Middle Eastern population highlights differences with Western populations with prognostic implication.

Authors:  Ramy A Abdelsalam; Ibrahim Khalifeh; Alan Box; Maria Kalantarian; Sunita Ghosh; Hatem Abou-Ouf; Tamara Lotfi; Mohammed Shahait; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  High alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) is associated with ERG expression and with adverse clinical outcome in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Adrian Box; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Samar A Hegazy; Bryan Donnelly; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-06-07

3.  SPINK1 Overexpression in Localized Prostate Cancer: a Rare Event Inversely Associated with ERG Expression and Exclusive of Homozygous PTEN Deletion.

Authors:  Kuo-Cheng Huang; Andrew Evans; Bryan Donnelly; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Comparison of different prostatic markers in lymph node and distant metastases of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Angela Queisser; Susanne A Hagedorn; Martin Braun; Wenzel Vogel; Stefan Duensing; Sven Perner
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  ERG expression is associated with increased risk of biochemical relapse following radical prostatectomy in early onset prostate cancer.

Authors:  K-C Huang; M Dolph; B Donnelly; T A Bismar
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Prostatic adenocarcinoma CNS parenchymal and dural metastases: alterations in ERG, CHD1 and MAP3K7 expression.

Authors:  D Ryan Ormond; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Daniel Cavalcante; Elizabeth E Smith; Scott D Cramer; M Scott Lucia
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  ERG rearrangement and protein expression in the progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  J R Gsponer; M Braun; V J Scheble; T Zellweger; A Bachmann; S Perner; T Vlajnic; M Srivastava; S H Tan; A Dobi; I A Sesterhenn; S Srivastava; L Bubendorf; C Ruiz
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  ERG and PTEN status of isolated high-grade PIN occurring in cystoprostatectomy specimens without invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Carlos L Morais; Liana B Guedes; Jessica Hicks; Alexander S Baras; Angelo M De Marzo; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Characterizing the molecular features of ERG-positive tumors in primary and castration resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Martine P Roudier; Brian R Winters; Ilsa Coleman; Hung-Ming Lam; Xiaotun Zhang; Roger Coleman; Lisly Chéry; Lawrence D True; Celestia S Higano; Bruce Montgomery; Paul H Lange; Linda A Snyder; Shiv Srivastava; Eva Corey; Robert L Vessella; Peter S Nelson; Aykut Üren; Colm Morrissey
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  The prognostic significance of combined ERG and androgen receptor expression in patients with prostate cancer managed by androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Kuo-Cheng Huang; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Samar A Hegazy; Michael Dolph; Bryan Donnelly; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.