Literature DB >> 23746591

Short communication: Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash and indigestible neutral detergent fiber as total-tract digestibility markers in dairy cows fed corn silage-based diets.

C Lee1, A N Hristov.   

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate acid-insoluble ash (AIA) and indigestible NDF (iNDF) as intrinsic digestibility markers in comparison with total fecal collection (TC) in dairy cows fed corn silage- and alfalfa haylage-based diets. The experiment was part of a larger experiment, which involved 8 Holstein cows [102±28.4 d in milk, 26.4±0.27 kg/d of dry matter (DM) intake, and 43±5.3 kg/d milk yield]. The experimental design was a replicated 4×4 Latin square with the following treatments: metabolizable protein (MP)-adequate diet [15.6% crude protein (CP); high-CP], MP-deficient diet (14.0% CP; low-CP), and 2 other low-CP diets supplemented (top-dressed) with ruminally protected Lys or Lys and Met. Data for the 3 low-CP diets were combined for this analysis. Total feces were collected for 5 consecutive days during each period to estimate total-tract apparent digestibility. Digestibility was also estimated using AIA (digestion with 2 N HCl) and iNDF (12-d ruminal incubation in 25-μm-pore-size bags). Significant diet × digestibility method interactions were observed for fecal output of nutrients and digestibility. Fecal output of nutrients estimated using AIA or iNDF was lower compared with TC and fecal output of DM, organic matter, and CP tended to be higher for iNDF compared with AIA for the high-CP diet. For the low-CP diet, however, fecal output of all nutrients was lower for AIA compared with TC and was higher for iNDF compared with TC. Data from this experiment showed that, compared with TC, AIA underestimated fecal output and overestimated digestibility, particularly evident with the fiber fractions and the protein-deficient diet. Compared with TC, fecal output was overestimated and digestibility of the low-CP diet was underestimated when iNDF was used as a marker, although the magnitude of the difference was smaller compared with that for AIA. In the conditions of the current study, iNDF appeared to be a more reliable digestibility marker than AIA in terms of detecting dietary differences in apparent digestibility of some nutrients, but significant diet × marker interactions existed that need to be considered when estimating total-tract digestibility using intrinsic markers.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acid-insoluble ash; dairy cow; digestibility; indigestible neutral detergent fiber

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23746591     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  14 in total

1.  Combination of pelleting and monensin does not affect antioxidant properties and fatty acids in milk of grazing dairy cows supplemented with a concentrate containing soybean seeds.

Authors:  Luiza Pozzi Marins Costa; Luciano Soares De Lima; Júlio Cesar Damasceno; Francilaine Eloise De Marchi; Fernanda Granzotto; Fabio Seiji Dos Santos; Alexandre Leseur Dos Santos; Geraldo Tadeu Dos Santos
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Comparison of in situ techniques to evaluate the recovery of indigestible components and the accuracy of digestibility estimates.

Authors:  Jordan M Adams; Aaron B Norris; Luiz F Dias Batista; Madeline E Rivera; Luis O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  An inhibitor persistently decreased enteric methane emission from dairy cows with no negative effect on milk production.

Authors:  Alexander N Hristov; Joonpyo Oh; Fabio Giallongo; Tyler W Frederick; Michael T Harper; Holley L Weeks; Antonio F Branco; Peter J Moate; Matthew H Deighton; S Richard O Williams; Maik Kindermann; Stephane Duval
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Understanding intake on pastures: how, why, and a way forward.

Authors:  William B Smith; Michael L Galyean; Robert L Kallenbach; Paul L Greenwood; Eric J Scholljegerdes
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Tithonia diversifolia as a Supplementary Feed for Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Rafael Sandin Ribeiro; Stephanie Amelia Terry; João Paulo Sacramento; Sylvia Rocha E Silveira; Cláudia Braga Pereira Bento; Elsa Fernandes da Silva; Hilário Cuquetto Mantovani; Marco Antônio Sundfeld da Gama; Luiz Gustavo Ribeiro Pereira; Thierry Ribeiro Tomich; Rogério Martins Maurício; Alexandre Vieira Chaves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Methane Production in Dairy Cows Correlates with Rumen Methanogenic and Bacterial Community Structure.

Authors:  Rebecca Danielsson; Johan Dicksved; Li Sun; Horacio Gonda; Bettina Müller; Anna Schnürer; Jan Bertilsson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Nitrogen partitioning and microbial protein synthesis in lactating dairy cows with different phenotypic residual feed intake.

Authors:  Yunyi Xie; Zezhong Wu; Diming Wang; Jianxin Liu
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-14

8.  Comparison of two in situ reference methods to estimate indigestible NDF by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy in alfalfa.

Authors:  G J Zhang; Y Wang; Y H Yan; M H Hall; D J Undersander; D K Combs
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-06-14

9.  Effects of different dietary ratio of physically effective neutral detergent fiber and metabolizable glucose on rumen fermentation, blood metabolites and growth performance of 8 to 10-month-old heifers.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Jinhao Xu; Yizhao Shen; Mengzhi Wang; Lihuai Yu; Hongrong Wang
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Jugular arginine supplementation increases lactation performance and nitrogen utilization efficiency in lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  Luoyang Ding; Yizhao Shen; Yifan Wang; Gang Zhou; Xin Zhang; Mengzhi Wang; Juan J Loor; Lianmin Chen; Jun Zhang
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.