Literature DB >> 23746588

Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows.

X Ding1, Z Zhang, X Li, S Wang, X Wu, D Sun, Y Yu, J Liu, Y Wang, Y Zhang, S Zhang, Y Zhang, Q Zhang.   

Abstract

Genomic selection using dense markers covering the whole genome is a tool for the genetic improvement of livestock and is revolutionizing the breeding system in dairy cattle. Progeny-tested bulls have been used to form reference populations in almost all countries where genomic selection has been implemented. In this study, the accuracy of genomic prediction when cows are used to form the reference population was investigated. The reference population consisted of 3,087 cows. All individuals were genotyped with Illumina BovineSNP50. After genotype imputation and editing, 48,676 single nucleotide polymorphisms were available for analysis. Two methods, genomic BLUP (GBLUP) and BayesB, were used to render genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for 5 milk production traits. Accuracies of GEBV were assessed in 3 ways: r(GEBV,EBV) (the correlation between GEBV and conventional EBV) in 67 progeny-tested bulls, rGEBV,EBV from a 5-fold cross validation in the 3,087 cow reference population, and the theoretical accuracy (for GBLUP) calculated in the same way as for conventional BLUP. The results showed that using GBLUP, the r(GEBV,EBV) and theoretical accuracy of genomic prediction in Chinese Holstein ranged from 0.59 to 0.76 and 0.70 to 0.80, respectively, which was 0.13 to 0.30 and 0.23 to 0.33 higher than the accuracies of conventional pedigree index, respectively. The results indicate that, as an alternative, genomic selection using cows in the reference population is feasible.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chinese Holstein; cow; cross validation; genomic selection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23746588     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  10 in total

1.  Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in Chinese Holstein cattle by using one-step blending.

Authors:  Xiujin Li; Sheng Wang; Ju Huang; Leyi Li; Qin Zhang; Xiangdong Ding
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  Short communication: investigation of the feasibility of genomic selection in Icelandic Cattle.

Authors:  Egill Gautason; Goutam Sahana; Guosheng Su; Baldur Helgi Benjamínsson; Guðmundur Jóhannesson; Bernt Guldbrandtsen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Single-step genomic evaluation of Russian dairy cattle using internal and external information.

Authors:  Andrei A Kudinov; Esa A Mäntysaari; Timo J Pitkänen; Ekaterina I Saksa; Gert P Aamand; Pekka Uimari; Ismo Strandén
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance-covariance matrix.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Malena Erbe; Jinlong He; Ulrike Ober; Ning Gao; Hao Zhang; Henner Simianer; Jiaqi Li
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 5.  Methods to address poultry robustness and welfare issues through breeding and associated ethical considerations.

Authors:  William M Muir; Heng-Wei Cheng; Candace Croney
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  The patterns of genomic variances and covariances across genome for milk production traits between Chinese and Nordic Holstein populations.

Authors:  Xiujin Li; Mogens Sandø Lund; Luc Janss; Chonglong Wang; Xiangdong Ding; Qin Zhang; Guosheng Su
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  Bayesian methods for jointly estimating genomic breeding values of one continuous and one threshold trait.

Authors:  Chonglong Wang; Xiujin Li; Rong Qian; Guosheng Su; Qin Zhang; Xiangdong Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessment of the genomic prediction accuracy for feed efficiency traits in meat-type chickens.

Authors:  Tianfei Liu; Chenglong Luo; Jie Wang; Jie Ma; Dingming Shu; Mogens Sandø Lund; Guosheng Su; Hao Qu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The influence of a first-order antedependence model and hyperparameters in BayesCπ for genomic prediction.

Authors:  Xiujin Li; Xiaohong Liu; Yaosheng Chen
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 10.  Genomic Analysis, Progress and Future Perspectives in Dairy Cattle Selection: A Review.

Authors:  Miguel A Gutierrez-Reinoso; Pedro M Aponte; Manuel Garcia-Herreros
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.231

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.