Literature DB >> 23746377

Efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin combination therapy versus pegylated interferon monotherapy in hemodialysis patients: a comparison of 2 sequentially treated cohorts.

Po-Lin Tseng1, Te-Chuan Chen, Yu-Shu Chien, Chao-Hung Hung, Yi-Hao Yen, Kuo-Chin Chang, Ming-Chao Tsai, Ming-Tsung Lin, Chien-Te Lee, Chien-Heng Shen, Tsung-Hui Hu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pegylated interferon (peginterferon; interferon with an attached polyethylene glycol molecule) monotherapy is the recommended treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in hemodialysis patients. Limited data concerning peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin treatment in this population are available. STUDY
DESIGN: 2 prospective observational cohort studies. SETTING &amp; PARTICIPANTS: From 2007-2009, a total of 26 patients received peginterferon alfa-2b monotherapy. From 2009-2012, an additional 26 patients were treated with peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. PREDICTORS: Peginterferon alfa-2b monotherapy, 1.0 μg/kg/wk, versus peginterferon alfa-2b, 1.0 μg/kg/wk, and ribavirin, 200 mg, 3 times per week. Treatment durations were 24 and 48 weeks for HCV genotypes non-1 and 1, respectively. OUTCOMES &amp; MEASUREMENTS: End-of-treatment virologic response and sustained virologic response (SVR) were undetectable HCV RNA at the end of treatment and 24 weeks after treatment ended, respectively. SVR and treatment-related withdrawal rate were evaluated by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Severe anemia was defined as nadir hemoglobin level <8 g/dL.
RESULTS: Patients who received combination therapy had a higher end-of-treatment virologic response than patients who received monotherapy (85% vs 62% in ITT [P = 0.03] and 100% vs 80% in PP [P = 0.03]). The SVR rate was higher in the combination-treatment cohort than in the monotherapy cohort (62% vs 27% in ITT [P = 0.01] and 73% vs 35% in PP [P = 0.01]). Patients who received combination therapy had a significantly higher rate of severe anemia than those who received monotherapy (58% vs 27%; P = 0.03). However, treatment withdrawal rates were similar between the combination (15%) and monotherapy (23%) groups. LIMITATIONS: Comparison of 2 sequential cohorts rather than a randomized control study.
CONCLUSIONS: Peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin combination therapy provided a higher SVR rate than peginterferon alfa-2b monotherapy for treatment-naive dialysis patients with chronic HCV infection through careful monitoring of hematologic parameters and ribavirin dose modification. Severe anemia was significantly higher in patients receiving combination therapy than patients treated with monotherapy.
Copyright © 2013 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic hepatitis C; hemodialysis; interleukin 28B; pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy; sustained virologic response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23746377     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.03.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  12 in total

Review 1.  Μanagement of patients with hepatitis B and C before and after liver and kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Chrysoula Pipili; Evangelos Cholongitas
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-05-27

2.  Treatment of HCV in Renal Disease: Subtle Management Considerations in the Era of Direct-acting Antivirals.

Authors:  Yuval A Patel; Andrew J Muir
Journal:  Curr Hepatol Rep       Date:  2016-11-05

3.  Relevance of low viral load in haemodialysed patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

Authors:  Jan Sperl; Sona Frankova; Renata Senkerikova; Magdalena Neroldova; Vaclav Hejda; Miroslava Volfova; Dusan Merta; Ondrej Viklicky; Julius Spicak; Milan Jirsa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Use of sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C viral infection in patients with severe renal insufficiency.

Authors:  Gregory L Hundemer; Meghan E Sise; Jessica Wisocky; Nneka Ufere; Lawrence S Friedman; Kathleen E Corey; Raymond T Chung
Journal:  Infect Dis (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-18

5.  Glecaprevir-pibrentasvir for chronic hepatitis C: Comparing treatment effect in patients with and without end-stage renal disease in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Hsu-Heng Yen; Pei-Yuan Su; Ya-Huei Zeng; I-Ling Liu; Siou-Ping Huang; Yu-Chun Hsu; Yang-Yuan Chen; Chia-Wei Yang; Shun-Sheng Wu; Kun-Ching Chou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  New therapies for hepatitis C: considerations in patients with renal impairment.

Authors:  Sarah Zimner-Rapuch; Nicolas Janus; Gilbert Deray; Vincent Launay-Vacher
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 11.431

Review 7.  Viral hepatitis C therapy: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  Clara T M M de Kanter; Joost P H Drenth; Joop E Arends; Henk W Reesink; Marc van der Valk; Robert J de Knegt; David M Burger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.577

Review 8.  Nanomedicines in the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in Asian patients: optimizing use of peginterferon alfa.

Authors:  Chen-Hua Liu; Jia-Horng Kao
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-04-25

9.  Pegylated interferon monotherapy for hepatitis C virus infection in patients on hemodialysis: A single center study.

Authors:  S K Agarwal; D Bhowmik; S Mahajan; S Bagchi
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

Review 10.  Hepatitis C and renal transplantation in era of new antiviral agents.

Authors:  Maurizio Salvadori; Aris Tsalouchos
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2018-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.