Literature DB >> 23746076

The effect of endoscopic mucosal resection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery on anorectal function.

R M Barendse1, J M Oors, E J R de Graaf, W A Bemelman, P Fockens, E Dekker, A J P M Smout.   

Abstract

AIM: The study assessed the impact on anorectal function of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) of large rectal adenomas.
METHOD: Patients with a large (≥ 3 cm) rectal adenoma undergoing EMR or TEM were included. Self-reported faecal incontinence was assessed using the Colorectal Functional Outcome (COREFO) questionnaire and the Wexner Incontinence Grading Scale. Anorectal manometry was performed before and at 6 months after treatment to measure anal resting (ARP) and squeeze pressure (SP), squeeze endurance (SE), the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), rectal volumetry of first sensation (FS), first urge (FU), maximum tolerable volume (MTV) and rectal compliance (RC).
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included in the study, of whom 11 underwent EMR and 13 underwent TEM. The mean adenoma size was 51 ± 19 mm and the median distance from the anal verge was 3 cm (interquartile range 1-10 cm). Follow-up data were available from 20 patients; one patient had died and three had undergone total mesorectal excision. Incontinence for liquid stool and Wexner score decreased significantly after treatment. In contrast, none of the measured parameters of anorectal motility (ARP, SP, SE, RAIR, RC) and perception (FS, FU, MTV) was affected by adenoma resection. No differences were found in baseline and follow-up incontinence and functional parameters between intervention groups, except for postprocedural ARP, which was lower after TEM than after EMR.
CONCLUSION: Continence in patients with a large rectal adenoma improved after EMR or TEM, probably due to decreased rectal mucus production. Anal sphincter pressure, rectoanal reflexes, rectal sensation and compliance were not affected by adenoma resection. Colorectal Disease
© 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anorectal function; adenoma; endoscopic mucosal resection; rectum; transanal endoscopic microsurgery

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23746076     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  9 in total

Review 1.  Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery.

Authors:  Theodore John Saclarides
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 2.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Earl V Thompson; Joshua I S Bleier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-04

3.  Systematic review of functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: a word of caution.

Authors:  Franco G Marinello; Anna Curell; Ingrid Tapiolas; Gianluca Pellino; Francesc Vallribera; Eloy Espin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate-term functional results.

Authors:  S H E M Clermonts; Y T van Loon; A H W Schiphorst; D K Wasowicz; D D E Zimmerman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project.

Authors:  Mauro Podda; Patricia Sylla; Gianluca Baiocchi; Michel Adamina; Vanni Agnoletti; Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Alberto Arezzo; Nicola Avenia; Walter Biffl; Antonio Biondi; Simona Bui; Fabio C Campanile; Paolo Carcoforo; Claudia Commisso; Antonio Crucitti; Nicola De'Angelis; Gian Luigi De'Angelis; Massimo De Filippo; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Giorgio Ercolani; Gustavo P Fraga; Francesco Gabrielli; Federica Gaiani; Mario Guerrieri; Angelo Guttadauro; Yoram Kluger; Ari K Leppaniemi; Andrea Loffredo; Tiziana Meschi; Ernest E Moore; Monica Ortenzi; Francesco Pata; Dario Parini; Adolfo Pisanu; Gilberto Poggioli; Andrea Polistena; Alessandro Puzziello; Fabio Rondelli; Massimo Sartelli; Neil Smart; Michael E Sugrue; Patricia Tejedor; Marco Vacante; Federico Coccolini; Justin Davies; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Fecal incontinence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  Matas Jakubauskas; Valdemaras Jotautas; Eligijus Poskus; Saulius Mikalauskas; Gintare Valeikaite-Tauginiene; Kestutis Strupas; Tomas Poskus
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A novel single-port laparoscopic operation for colorectal cancer with transanal specimen extraction: a comparative study.

Authors:  Say-June Kim; Byung-Jo Choi; Sang Chul Lee
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery for internal rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A L A Bloemendaal; M De Schepper; A Mishra; R Hompes; O M Jones; I Lindsey; C Cunningham
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Short-term Outcomes of Transanal versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Wu; Wenlong Zhou; Fu Chen; Wentao Wang; Yong Feng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.