OBJECTIVES: A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for treating recurrent variceal bleeding or refractory ascites can be used as bridge therapy in patients awaiting a liver transplant. However, incorrect placement of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt may complicate surgery during a liver transplant. This study sought to analyze a cohort of transplanted recipients to underscore whether transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts can negatively affect liver transplant outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 207 patients who had undergone a liver transplant between January 2001 and December 2009 in the Rome "La Sapienza" center. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was performed before the liver transplant in 36 cases (17%). The analyzed population was stratified into 2 groups (no transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [n=171 ] and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [n=36 ]), and patient survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS: In the no-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group, 60 of 171 deaths (35%) were reported, 20 of which were seen in the first 3 months after the liver transplant. In the same group, 61 graft losses (36%) were observed, with 19 of which were seen in the first 3 months after the liver transplant. In transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group, 12 of the 36 deaths (33%) were seen; 5 patients died within 3 months of the liver transplant. In this latter group, 12 grafts (33%) were lost, 4 of which were reported during the first 3 months after surgery. The median patient survival was 64 months and 69 months in the 2 groups. On survival analysis, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt does not seem to affect outcomes after a liver transplant. We suggest that clinicians recognized the location of the stent to prevent any difficulty during surgery.
OBJECTIVES: A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for treating recurrent variceal bleeding or refractory ascites can be used as bridge therapy in patients awaiting a liver transplant. However, incorrect placement of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt may complicate surgery during a liver transplant. This study sought to analyze a cohort of transplanted recipients to underscore whether transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts can negatively affect liver transplant outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 207 patients who had undergone a liver transplant between January 2001 and December 2009 in the Rome "La Sapienza" center. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was performed before the liver transplant in 36 cases (17%). The analyzed population was stratified into 2 groups (no transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [n=171 ] and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [n=36 ]), and patient survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS: In the no-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group, 60 of 171 deaths (35%) were reported, 20 of which were seen in the first 3 months after the liver transplant. In the same group, 61 graft losses (36%) were observed, with 19 of which were seen in the first 3 months after the liver transplant. In transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group, 12 of the 36 deaths (33%) were seen; 5 patients died within 3 months of the liver transplant. In this latter group, 12 grafts (33%) were lost, 4 of which were reported during the first 3 months after surgery. The median patient survival was 64 months and 69 months in the 2 groups. On survival analysis, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt does not seem to affect outcomes after a liver transplant. We suggest that clinicians recognized the location of the stent to prevent any difficulty during surgery.
Authors: Khalid Mumtaz; Sherif Metwally; Rohan M Modi; Nishi Patel; Dmitry Tumin; Anthony J Michaels; James Hanje; Ashraf El-Hinnawi; Don Hayes; Sylvester M Black Journal: World J Hepatol Date: 2017-01-18