INTRODUCTION: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a promising tool for regenerative medicine, but due to the heterogeneity of their populations, different sources and isolation techniques, the characteristics defining MSCs are inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of MSCs derived from two different human tissues: peripheral blood (PB-MSCs) and umbilical cord Wharton's Jelly (UC-MSCs). METHODS: The PB-MSC and UC-MSC were isolated by adherence to plastic after gradient-density separation or an explant culture method, respectively, and compared regarding their morphology, clonogenic efficiency, proliferating rates, immunophenotype and differentiation potential. RESULTS: MSCs derived from both sources exhibit similar morphology, proliferation capacity and multilineage (osteogenic, chondrogenic, adipogenic and myogenic) differentiation potential. Differences were observed in the clonogenic capacity and the immunophenotype, since UC-MSCs showed higher CFU-F (colony-forming units-fibroblastic) cloning efficiency, as well as higher embryonic markers (Na-nog, Sox2, SSEA4) expression. When additional surface antigens were analyzed by flow cytometry (CD44, CD90, CD105, CD33, CD34, CD45, CD11b, CD235a) or immunofluorescent labeling (vimentin, STRO-1 and alpha-smooth muscle actin), most appeared to have similar epitope profiles irrespective of MSC source. CONCLUSION: The results obtained demonstrated that both MSCs represent good alternative sources of adult MSCs that could be used in cell therapy applications.
INTRODUCTION: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a promising tool for regenerative medicine, but due to the heterogeneity of their populations, different sources and isolation techniques, the characteristics defining MSCs are inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of MSCs derived from two different human tissues: peripheral blood (PB-MSCs) and umbilical cord Wharton's Jelly (UC-MSCs). METHODS: The PB-MSC and UC-MSC were isolated by adherence to plastic after gradient-density separation or an explant culture method, respectively, and compared regarding their morphology, clonogenic efficiency, proliferating rates, immunophenotype and differentiation potential. RESULTS: MSCs derived from both sources exhibit similar morphology, proliferation capacity and multilineage (osteogenic, chondrogenic, adipogenic and myogenic) differentiation potential. Differences were observed in the clonogenic capacity and the immunophenotype, since UC-MSCs showed higher CFU-F (colony-forming units-fibroblastic) cloning efficiency, as well as higher embryonic markers (Na-nog, Sox2, SSEA4) expression. When additional surface antigens were analyzed by flow cytometry (CD44, CD90, CD105, CD33, CD34, CD45, CD11b, CD235a) or immunofluorescent labeling (vimentin, STRO-1 and alpha-smooth muscle actin), most appeared to have similar epitope profiles irrespective of MSC source. CONCLUSION: The results obtained demonstrated that both MSCs represent good alternative sources of adult MSCs that could be used in cell therapy applications.
Authors: Shaowei Li; Ke-Jung Huang; Jen-Chieh Wu; Michael S Hu; Mrinmoy Sanyal; Min Hu; Michael T Longaker; H Peter Lorenz Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 6.940
Authors: Irena Walecka; Paulina Gil-Kulik; Arkadiusz Krzyżanowski; Marcin Czop; Dariusz Galkowski; Jolanta Karwat; Piotr Chomik; Małgorzata Świstowska; Anna Kwaśniewska; Anna Bogucka-Kocka; Janusz Kocki Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2017-04-19
Authors: Naimisha Beeravolu; Christina McKee; Ali Alamri; Sasha Mikhael; Christina Brown; Mick Perez-Cruet; G Rasul Chaudhry Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 1.355