BACKGROUND: Cancer monitoring and prevention relies on the critical aspect of timely notification of cancer cases. However, the abstraction and classification of cancer from the free-text of pathology reports and other relevant documents, such as death certificates, exist as complex and time-consuming activities. AIMS: In this paper, approaches for the automatic detection of notifiable cancer cases as the cause of death from free-text death certificates supplied to Cancer Registries are investigated. METHOD: A number of machine learning classifiers were studied. Features were extracted using natural language techniques and the Medtex toolkit. The numerous features encompassed stemmed words, bi-grams, and concepts from the SNOMED CT medical terminology. The baseline consisted of a keyword spotter using keywords extracted from the long description of ICD-10 cancer related codes. RESULTS: Death certificates with notifiable cancer listed as the cause of death can be effectively identified with the methods studied in this paper. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier achieved best performance with an overall Fmeasure of 0.9866 when evaluated on a set of 5,000 freetext death certificates using the token stem feature set. The SNOMED CT concept plus token stem feature set reached the lowest variance (0.0032) and false negative rate (0.0297) while achieving an F-measure of 0.9864. The SVM classifier accounts for the first 18 of the top 40 evaluated runs, and entails the most robust classifier with a variance of 0.001141, half the variance of the other classifiers. CONCLUSION: The selection of features significantly produced the most influences on the performance of the classifiers, although the type of classifier employed also affects performance. In contrast, the feature weighting schema created a negligible effect on performance. Specifically, it is found that stemmed tokens with or without SNOMED CT concepts create the most effective feature when combined with an SVM classifier.
BACKGROUND:Cancer monitoring and prevention relies on the critical aspect of timely notification of cancer cases. However, the abstraction and classification of cancer from the free-text of pathology reports and other relevant documents, such as death certificates, exist as complex and time-consuming activities. AIMS: In this paper, approaches for the automatic detection of notifiable cancer cases as the cause of death from free-text death certificates supplied to Cancer Registries are investigated. METHOD: A number of machine learning classifiers were studied. Features were extracted using natural language techniques and the Medtex toolkit. The numerous features encompassed stemmed words, bi-grams, and concepts from the SNOMED CT medical terminology. The baseline consisted of a keyword spotter using keywords extracted from the long description of ICD-10 cancer related codes. RESULTS:Death certificates with notifiable cancer listed as the cause of death can be effectively identified with the methods studied in this paper. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier achieved best performance with an overall Fmeasure of 0.9866 when evaluated on a set of 5,000 freetext death certificates using the token stem feature set. The SNOMED CT concept plus token stem feature set reached the lowest variance (0.0032) and false negative rate (0.0297) while achieving an F-measure of 0.9864. The SVM classifier accounts for the first 18 of the top 40 evaluated runs, and entails the most robust classifier with a variance of 0.001141, half the variance of the other classifiers. CONCLUSION: The selection of features significantly produced the most influences on the performance of the classifiers, although the type of classifier employed also affects performance. In contrast, the feature weighting schema created a negligible effect on performance. Specifically, it is found that stemmed tokens with or without SNOMED CT concepts create the most effective feature when combined with an SVM classifier.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer Registry; Death certificates; SNOMED CT; cancer monitoring and reporting; machine learning; natural language processing
Authors: Leonard W D'Avolio; Thien M Nguyen; Wildon R Farwell; Yongming Chen; Felicia Fitzmeyer; Owen M Harris; Louis D Fiore Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Anthony N Nguyen; Michael J Lawley; David P Hansen; Rayleen V Bowman; Belinda E Clarke; Edwina E Duhig; Shoni Colquist Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: M P Coleman; D Forman; H Bryant; J Butler; B Rachet; C Maringe; U Nur; E Tracey; M Coory; J Hatcher; C E McGahan; D Turner; L Marrett; M L Gjerstorff; T B Johannesen; J Adolfsson; M Lambe; G Lawrence; D Meechan; E J Morris; R Middleton; J Steward; M A Richards Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-12-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Bevan Koopman; Sarvnaz Karimi; Anthony Nguyen; Rhydwyn McGuire; David Muscatello; Madonna Kemp; Donna Truran; Ming Zhang; Sarah Thackway Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Patrick J Ward; Peter J Rock; Svetla Slavova; April M Young; Terry L Bunn; Ramakanth Kavuluru Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christophe Gaudet-Blavignac; Vasiliki Foufi; Mina Bjelogrlic; Christian Lovis Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 5.428