BACKGROUND: Family members are commonly involved in end-of-life decision making and typically involved in inpatient palliative care consultations. Although much research has documented patient outcomes following inpatient palliative care consultation, little is known about family member perceptions of the consultation. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine how inpatient palliative care consultations impacted family members' understanding of the patient's condition, knowledge of available care options, and decision-making ability. DESIGN: An exploratory, qualitative study was conducted employing individual interviews among family members of seriously ill patients, recruited purposively. Interviews were conducted in person, at the hospital, or via telephone, using a semistructured protocol. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Family members of seriously ill patients were recruited from a nonprofit, community hospital. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted among 23 family members. Four themes were identified and included: perceived qualities of the inpatient palliative care consultation, family readiness, impact on decision-making process, and focus on comfort and quality of life. While most comments reflected positive aspects of the inpatient palliative care consult, such as improved pain control and communication, and increased access to medical professionals and time to discuss patient conditions, some themes reflected a lack of adequate preparation for the inpatient palliative care consultation and readiness for discussing prognosis. CONCLUSION: Family members report discussion with the inpatient palliative care team results in improved communication and knowledge, which contributes to decision-making ability. However, palliative care consultation may be improved by developing stronger protocols for introducing palliative care and by including the attending physician in the process to preclude conflicting, inconsistent information and recommendations.
BACKGROUND: Family members are commonly involved in end-of-life decision making and typically involved in inpatient palliative care consultations. Although much research has documented patient outcomes following inpatient palliative care consultation, little is known about family member perceptions of the consultation. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine how inpatient palliative care consultations impacted family members' understanding of the patient's condition, knowledge of available care options, and decision-making ability. DESIGN: An exploratory, qualitative study was conducted employing individual interviews among family members of seriously ill patients, recruited purposively. Interviews were conducted in person, at the hospital, or via telephone, using a semistructured protocol. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Family members of seriously ill patients were recruited from a nonprofit, community hospital. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted among 23 family members. Four themes were identified and included: perceived qualities of the inpatient palliative care consultation, family readiness, impact on decision-making process, and focus on comfort and quality of life. While most comments reflected positive aspects of the inpatient palliative care consult, such as improved pain control and communication, and increased access to medical professionals and time to discuss patient conditions, some themes reflected a lack of adequate preparation for the inpatient palliative care consultation and readiness for discussing prognosis. CONCLUSION: Family members report discussion with the inpatient palliative care team results in improved communication and knowledge, which contributes to decision-making ability. However, palliative care consultation may be improved by developing stronger protocols for introducing palliative care and by including the attending physician in the process to preclude conflicting, inconsistent information and recommendations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Palliative care; decision making; family members; health communication; qualitative research
Authors: Jason Z Niehaus; Megan M Palmer; James Slaven; Amy Hatton; Caitlin Scanlon; Adam B Hill Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Celina F Estacio; Phyllis N Butow; Melanie R Lovell; Skye T Dong; Josephine M Clayton Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-03-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Peter Chamberlin; Jason Lambden; Elissa Kozlov; Renee Maciejewski; Lindsay Lief; David A Berlin; Latrice Pelissier; Elina Yushuvayev; Cynthia X Pan; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 2.947