Literature DB >> 23744818

Patients' inability to perform a preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise test or demonstrate an anaerobic threshold is associated with inferior outcomes after major colorectal surgery.

C W Lai1, G Minto, C P Challand, K B Hosie, J R Sneyd, S Creanor, R A Struthers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical patients with poor functional capacity, determined by oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold (AT) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), experience longer hospital stays and worse short- and medium-term survival. However, previous studies excluded patients who were unable to perform a CPET or who failed to demonstrate an AT. We hypothesized that such patients are at risk of inferior outcomes after elective surgery.
METHODS: All patients undergoing major colorectal surgery attempted CPET to assist in the planning of care. Patients were stratified by their test results into Fit (AT ≥ 11.0 ml O2 kg(-1) min(-1)), Unfit (AT < 11.0 ml O2 kg(-1) min(-1)), or Unable to CPET groups (failed to pedal or demonstrate an AT). For each group, we determined hospital stay and mortality.
RESULTS: Between March 2009 and April 2010, 269 consecutive patients were screened, and proceeded to bowel resection. Median hospital stay was 8 days (IQR 5.1-13.4) and there were 44 deaths (16%) at 2 yr; 26 (9.7%) patients were categorized as Unable to CPET, 69 (25.7%) Unfit and 174 (64.7%) Fit. There were statistically significant differences between the three groups in hospital stay [median (IQR) 14.0 (10.5-23.8) vs 9.9 (5.5-15) vs 7.1 (4.9-10.8) days, P < 0.01] and mortality at 2 yr [11/26 (42%) vs 14/69 (20%) vs 19/174 (11%), respectively (P < 0.01)] although the differences between Unable and Unfit were not statistically different.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' inability to perform CPET is associated with inferior outcomes after major colorectal surgery. Future studies evaluating CPET in risk assessment for major surgery should report outcomes for this subgroup.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exercise test; general surgery; length of stay; mortality; preoperative care; risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23744818     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  15 in total

1.  Sympathetic autonomic dysfunction and impaired cardiovascular performance in higher risk surgical patients: implications for perioperative sympatholysis.

Authors:  John Whittle; Alexander Nelson; James M Otto; Robert C M Stephens; Daniel S Martin; J Robert Sneyd; Richard Struthers; Gary Minto; Gareth L Ackland
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-10-19

2.  The effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on whole-body physical fitness and skeletal muscle mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in vivo in locally advanced rectal cancer patients--an observational pilot study.

Authors:  Malcolm A West; Lisa Loughney; Daniel Lythgoe; Christopher P Barben; Valerie L Adams; William E Bimson; Michael P W Grocott; Sandy Jack; Graham J Kemp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Performance of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the prediction of post-operative complications in non cardiopulmonary surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel J Stubbs; Lisa A Grimes; Ari Ercole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The accuracy of pre-operative (P)-POSSUM scoring and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in predicting morbidity and mortality after pancreatic and liver surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  J Dutton; M Zardab; V J F De Braal; D Hariharan; N MacDonald; S Hallworth; R Hutchins; S Bhattacharya; A Abraham; H M Kocher; V S Yip
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-12-28

5.  Pre-admission interventions (prehabilitation) to improve outcome after major elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Perry; Georgia Herbert; Charlotte Atkinson; Clare England; Kate Northstone; Sarah Baos; Tim Brush; Amanda Chong; Andy Ness; Jessica Harris; Anne Haase; Sanjoy Shah; Maria Pufulete
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Association of Preoperative Physical Activity with Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Palliative Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis.

Authors:  Ching-Chung Cheng; I-Li Lai; Shu-Huan Huang; Wen-Sy Tsai; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Chien-Yuh Yeh; Sum-Fu Chiang; Hsin-Yuan Hung; Jeng-Fu You
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  Contemporary Management of Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Views from the PelvEx Collaborative.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Pre-admission interventions to improve outcome after elective surgery-protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel Perry; Lauren J Scott; Alison Richards; Anne M Haase; Jelena Savović; Andrew R Ness; Charlotte Atkinson; Jessica Harris; Lucy Culliford; Sanjoy Shah; Maria Pufulete
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-23

9.  Comparison of risk-scoring systems in the prediction of outcome after liver resection.

Authors:  S Ulyett; G Shahtahmassebi; S Aroori; M J Bowles; C D Briggs; M G Wiggans; G Minto; D A Stell
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-11-25

10.  Does prehabilitation modify muscle mass in patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy? A subanalysis from the REx randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S J Moug; S J E Barry; S Maguire; N Johns; D Dolan; R J C Steele; C Buchan; G Mackay; A S Anderson; N Mutrie
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.