Literature DB >> 23744796

Direct comparison of intra-articular versus intravenous delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of hip joint cartilage.

Christoph Zilkens1, Falk Miese, Young-Jo Kim, Marcus Jäger, Tallal C Mamisch, Harish Hosalkar, Gerald Antoch, Rüdiger Krauspe, Bernd Bittersohl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the potential of delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in cartilage (dGEMRIC) after intra-articular (ia) contrast agent administration at 3 Tesla (T), a paired study comparing intravenous (iv) dGEMRIC (standard) with ia-dGEMRIC was performed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five symptomatic patients with suspected cartilage damage underwent ia- and iv-dGEMRIC. MRI was performed with a 3T system wherein the interval between both measurements was 2 weeks. For iv-dGEMRIC, FDA approved Gd-DOTA(-) was injected intravenously 45 min before the MRI scan. For ia-dGEMRIC, 10-20 mL of a 2 mM solution of Gd- DOTA(-) was injected under fluoroscopic guidance 30 min before the MRI scan.
RESULTS: Both ia- and iv-dGEMRIC demonstrated the typical T1Gd pattern in hip joint cartilage with increasing values toward the superior regions in acetabular cartilage reflecting the higher glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content in the main weight-bearing area. Correlation analysis revealed a moderate correlation between both techniques (r = 0.439, P-value < 0.001), whereas the T1Gd values for iv-dGEMRIC were significantly higher than those for ia-dGEMRIC. This corresponds with the Bland-Altman plot analysis, which revealed a systemic bias (higher T1Gd values after iv gadolinium application) of ∼70 ms.
CONCLUSION: Ia-dGEMRIC was able to reveal the characteristic T1Gd pattern in hip joint cartilage confirming the sensitivity of ia-dGEMRIC for GAG. In addition, there was a significant correlation between iv-dGEMRIC and ia-dGEMRIC. However, the T1Gd values after ia contrast media application were significantly lower than those after iv application that has to be considered for future studies.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3T; cartilage; dGEMRIC; hip joint; osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23744796     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  8 in total

Review 1.  MRI of the hip for the evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement; past, present, and future.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Riley; Emily J McWalter; Kathryn J Stevens; Marc R Safran; Riccardo Lattanzi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  T2*-Mapping of Acetabular Cartilage in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement at 3 Tesla: Comparative Analysis with Arthroscopic Findings.

Authors:  Tobias Hesper; Christina Neugroda; Christoph Schleich; Gerald Antoch; Harish Hosalkar; Rüdiger Krauspe; Christoph Zilkens; Bernd Bittersohl
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  How Does the dGEMRIC Index Change After Surgical Treatment for FAI? A Prospective Controlled Study: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Pascal C Haefeli; Markus S Hanke; Emanuel F Liechti; Stefan F Werlen; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Hip imaging in clinical trials in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G E Gold; F Cicuttini; M D Crema; F Eckstein; A Guermazi; R Kijowski; T M Link; E Maheu; J Martel-Pelletier; C G Miller; J-P Pelletier; C G Peterfy; H G Potter; F W Roemer; D J Hunter
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 5.  Current knowledge and importance of dGEMRIC techniques in diagnosis of hip joint diseases.

Authors:  Christoph Zilkens; Carl Johann Tiderius; Rüdiger Krauspe; Bernd Bittersohl
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Chondral lesions in the hip: a review of relevant anatomy, imaging and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Alison A Dallich; Ehud Rath; Ran Atzmon; Joshua R Radparvar; Andrea Fontana; Zachary Sharfman; Eyal Amar
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2019-04-16

Review 7.  Advanced Imaging in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Current State and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Bernd Bittersohl; Harish S Hosalkar; Tobias Hesper; Carl Johan Tiderius; Christoph Zilkens; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-07-24

Review 8.  Imaging of femoroacetabular impingement-current concepts.

Authors:  Christoph E Albers; Nicholas Wambeek; Markus S Hanke; Florian Schmaranzer; Gareth H Prosser; Piers J Yates
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2016-11-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.