Literature DB >> 23743462

Effect of rotation on perineal lacerations in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.

Megan S Bradley1, Robert J Kaminski, David C Streitman, Shannon L Dunn, Elizabeth E Krans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the difference in the rates of severe perineal lacerations between forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries in the occiput-posterior position compared with forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries in which the fetal head was rotated to occiput-anterior before delivery.
METHODS: We studied a retrospective cohort of 148 women who had a forceps-assisted vaginal delivery from 2008 to 2011 at the University of Pittsburgh. Mild perineal lacerations were defined as first or second degree, and severe lacerations were defined as third or fourth degree. χ and t tests were used for bivariate and logistic regression was used for multivariable analyses. P<.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Of 148 forceps-assisted deliveries, 81 delivered occiput-anterior after either manual or forceps rotation, 10 delivered in the occiput-posterior or occiput-transverse position after an unsuccessful rotation, and 57 delivered occiput-posterior without attempted rotation. No significant differences were found among demographic, obstetric, and neonatal characteristics of the groups. Overall, 86 (67.7%) women had mild lacerations and 41 (32.3%) had severe lacerations. A significantly greater rate of severe perineal lacerations was found in the occiput-posterior nonrotated compared with the rotated group (43.4% compared with 24.3%; P=.02). In multivariable analyses, adjusted for age, race, insurance, body mass index, gestational age, parity, episiotomy, and birth weight, forceps-assisted vaginal delivery in the occiput-posterior position without rotation remained significantly more likely to be associated with severe lacerations (odds ratio 3.67, 95% confidence interval 1.42-9.47).
CONCLUSION: Forceps-assisted vaginal delivery after rotation of an occiput-posterior position to an occiput-anterior position is associated with less severe maternal perineal trauma than forceps-assisted delivery in the occiput-posterior position. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23743462      PMCID: PMC3709575          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829752fc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  2 in total

1.  Severe perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery: the impact of occiput posterior position.

Authors:  E Hirsch; R Elue; A Wagner; K Nelson; R K Silver; Y Zhou; M G Adams
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Does a large infant head or a short perineal body increase the risk of obstetrical perineal trauma?

Authors:  Leanne K Komorowski; Lawrence M Leeman; Anne M Fullilove; Edward J Bedrick; Laura D Migliaccio; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.689

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.