Literature DB >> 23743461

Relationship of the length of the first stage of labor to the length of the second stage.

David B Nelson1, Donald D McIntire, Kenneth J Leveno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the lengths of the first and second stages of labor.
METHODS: In this observational study of women delivering at our hospital, the onset of the first stage of labor was defined as admission at 3-cm to 4-cm dilatation in the presence of uterine contractions with or without rupture of membranes. This study was limited to nulliparous women with a singleton, cephalic live birth at 37 0/7 weeks of gestation or more. Women presenting with more advanced cervical dilatation (greater than 4 cm), prior cesarean delivery, diabetes, hypertension, and placental accidents were excluded. Each woman was analyzed based on her specific lengths of first and second stages of labor, that is, paired observations for each woman.
RESULTS: Between January 1, 2001, and June 30, 2012, a total of 172,522 women were delivered and 12,523 (7.3%) met the inclusion criteria. The 95 percentile was 15.6 and 2.9 hours for the first and second stages, respectively. Women with first stages greater than the 95 percentile had a 16.3% rate of a second-stage length greater than the 95 percentile compared with 4.5% (P<.001) in women with first stages less than the 95 percentile. This relationship persisted when analyzed for variables influencing labor to include neonate birth weight, epidural analgesia, or maternal size.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the length of the second stage significantly increased concomitantly with increasing length of the first stage (P<.001). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23743461     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182972907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  The association between longer durations of the latent phase of labor and subsequent perinatal processes and outcomes among midwifery patients.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Julia C Phillippi; Nicole Carlson; Mekhala Dissanayake; Christopher S Lee; Aaron B Caughey; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Durations of second stage of labor and pushing, and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  A Sandström; M Altman; S Cnattingius; S Johansson; M Ahlberg; O Stephansson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Station of the fetal head at complete cervical dilation impacts duration of second stage of labor.

Authors:  Elisabeth Ludvigsen; Finn Egil Skjeldestad
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-10-31

4.  Influence of Body Mass Index on Gestation and Delivery in Nulliparous Women: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Noemí Rodríguez-Mesa; Paula Robles-Benayas; Yolanda Rodríguez-López; Eva María Pérez-Fernández; Ana Isabel Cobo-Cuenca
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Assessing maternal thyroid function and its relationship to duration of the first stage of labor.

Authors:  Hongcheng Wei; Quanquan Guan; Qiurun Yu; Ting Chen; Xu Wang; Yankai Xia
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2022-03-17

Review 6.  Diagnosing onset of labor: a systematic review of definitions in the research literature.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Sarah Munro; Devon Greyson; Mechthild M Gross; Vanora Hundley; Helen Spiby; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  The impact of stage of labor on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Li Wang; Hongxia Wang; Lu Jia; Wenjie Qing; Fan Li; Jie Zhou
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.