Literature DB >> 23743114

Small-bore chest tubes seem to perform better than larger tubes in treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax.

Ulrik Winning Iepsen1, Thomas Ringbæk.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and complications of surgical (large-bore) chest tube drainage with smaller and less invasive chest tubes in the treatment of non-traumatic pneumothorax (PT).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 104 cases (94 patients) of non-traumatic PT treated with chest tubes - either by pulmonary physicians (daytime and weekdays) using small-bore chest tubes, or by orthopaedic surgeons (remaining time slots) using large-bore chest tubes.
RESULTS: A total of 62 had primary spontaneous PT, 30 had secondary spontaneous PT and 12 had iatrogenic PT. A total of 62 patients were treated with large-bore (20-28 Fr) chest tubes placed with traditional thoracotomy, 42 patients were treated by a pulmonary physician, and in 30 of these cases a True-Close thoracic vent (11-13 Fr) was inserted. Patients treated with surgical chest tubes were comparable with patients treated with smaller chest tubes in terms of demographic data and type and size of PT. Compared with patients treated with smaller chest tubes, patients with surgical large-bore tubes had more complications (27.4% versus 9.5%; p = 0.026), a lower success rate (56.5% versus 85.7%; p = 0.002), and longer duration of chest tube (8.3 versus 4.9 days; p = 0.001) and of hospitalisation (11.8 versus 6.9 days; p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: We found small chest tubes to be superior to large-bore chest tubes with regard to short-term outcomes in the treatment of non-traumatic PT. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The project was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency, file no. 2012-41-0554.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23743114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med J        ISSN: 2245-1919            Impact factor:   1.240


  5 in total

1.  Spontaneous Pneumothorax.

Authors:  Jost Schnell; Aris Koryllos; Alberto Lopez-Pastorini; Rolf Lefering; Erich Stoelben
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Is it possible to standardize the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax? Part 1: etiology, symptoms, diagnostics, minimally invasive treatment.

Authors:  Wojciech Rokicki; Marek Rokicki; Jacek Wojtacha; Marek Filipowski; Agata Dżejlili; Damian Czyżewski
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2016-12-30

3.  Comparing complications of small-bore chest tubes to large-bore chest tubes in the setting of delayed hemothorax: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  A Orlando; J Cordero; M M Carrick; A H Tanner; K Banton; R Vogel; M Lieser; D Acuna; D Bar-Or
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  The effectiveness of small-bore intercostal catheters versus large-bore chest tubes in the management of pleural disease with the systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Sumit Mehra; Subash Heraganahally; Dimitar Sajkov; Sharon Morton; Jeffrey Bowden
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2020 May-Jun

5.  Randomized controlled trial on the comparison of chest tube drainage and needle aspiration in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax.

Authors:  Ali Ramouz; Mohammad Hossein Lashkari; Sanam Fakour; Seyed Ziaeddin Rasihashemi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.