Literature DB >> 23743044

Universal access to care for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an analysis of surveillance data.

Dennis Falzon1, Ernesto Jaramillo, Fraser Wares, Matteo Zignol, Katherine Floyd, Mario C Raviglione.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prospects for global tuberculosis control in the near future will be determined by the effectiveness of the response of countries to their burden of multidrug-resistant (MDR; resistance to, at least, isoniazid and rifampicin) tuberculosis. During the 2009 World Health Assembly, countries committed to achieve universal access to MDR-tuberculosis care by 2015. We assessed the progress towards the 2015 targets achieved by countries accounting for 90% of the estimated MDR-tuberculosis cases in the world in 2011.
METHODS: We analysed data reported to WHO by 30 countries expected to have more than 1000 MDR-tuberculosis cases among notified patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in 2011.
FINDINGS: In the 30 countries, 18% of the estimated MDR-tuberculosis cases were enrolled on treatment in 2011. Belarus, Brazil, Kazakhstan, Peru, South Africa, and Ukraine each detected and enrolled on treatment more than 50% of their estimated cases of MDR-tuberculosis. In Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Russia, enrolments increased steadily between 2009 and 2011 with a mean yearly change greater than 50%: however, in these countries enrolment in 2011 was low, ranging from 4% to 43% of the estimated cases. In the remaining countries (Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, China, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Mozambique, Burma, Nepal, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, South Korea, Thailand, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam) progress in detection and enrolment was slower. In 23 countries, a median of 53% (IQR 41-71) patients with MDR-tuberculosis successfully completed their treatment after starting it in 2008-09.
INTERPRETATION: Six countries (Belarus, Brazil, Kazakhstan, Peru, South Africa, and Ukraine) can achieve universal access to MDR-tuberculosis care by 2015 should they sustain their current pace of progress. In other countries a radical scale-up will be needed for them to have an effect on their MDR-tuberculosis burden. Unless barriers to diagnosis and successful treatment are urgently overcome, and new technologies in diagnostics and treatment effectively implemented, the global targets for 2015 are unlikely be achieved. FUNDING: WHO.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23743044     DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70130-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


  41 in total

1.  The Distribution of Fitness Costs of Resistance-Conferring Mutations Is a Key Determinant for the Future Burden of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Model-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Gwenan M Knight; Caroline Colijn; Sourya Shrestha; Mariam Fofana; Frank Cobelens; Richard G White; David W Dowdy; Ted Cohen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Estimating the global burden of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among prevalent cases of tuberculosis.

Authors:  S Nourzad; H E Jenkins; M Milstein; C D Mitnick
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis disease in children: systematic review and global estimates.

Authors:  Helen E Jenkins; Arielle W Tolman; Courtney M Yuen; Jonathan B Parr; Salmaan Keshavjee; Carlos M Pérez-Vélez; Marcello Pagano; Mercedes C Becerra; Ted Cohen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Improving outcomes for multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in the Peruvian Amazon - a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Thomas W McNally; Gilles de Wildt; Graciela Meza; Connie M D Wiskin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Effect of bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination on CD4+Foxp3+ T cells during acquired immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.

Authors:  Marcela I Henao-Tamayo; Andres Obregón-Henao; Kimberly Arnett; Crystal A Shanley; Brendan Podell; Ian M Orme; Diane J Ordway
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.962

6.  Evolution of Mycolic Acid Biosynthesis Genes and Their Regulation during Starvation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Stevie Jamet; Yves Quentin; Coralie Coudray; Pauline Texier; Françoise Laval; Mamadou Daffé; Gwennaele Fichant; Kaymeuang Cam
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  Understanding pharmacokinetics to improve tuberculosis treatment outcome.

Authors:  Jonathan Reynolds; Scott K Heysell
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.481

8.  Infection Control for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: Early Diagnosis and Treatment Is the Key.

Authors:  Gilles van Cutsem; Petros Isaakidis; Jason Farley; Ed Nardell; Grigory Volchenkov; Helen Cox
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Mortality in adults with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and HIV by antiretroviral therapy and tuberculosis drug use: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gregory P Bisson; Mayara Bastos; Jonathon R Campbell; Didi Bang; James C Brust; Petros Isaakidis; Christoph Lange; Dick Menzies; Giovanni B Migliori; Jean W Pape; Domingo Palmero; Parvaneh Baghaei; Payam Tabarsi; Piret Viiklepp; Stalz Vilbrun; Jonathan Walsh; Suzanne M Marks
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  MDR-TB screening in a setting with molecular diagnostic techniques: who got tested, who didn't and why?

Authors:  H D Shewade; S Govindarajan; B N Sharath; J P Tripathy; P Chinnakali; A M V Kumar; M Muthaiah; K Vivekananda; A K Paulraj; G Roy
Journal:  Public Health Action       Date:  2015-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.