Literature DB >> 23742987

Clinical and economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: 5-year follow-up of multicentre randomised trial (the REFLUX trial).

A M Grant1, C Boachie, S C Cotton, R Faria, L Bojke, D M Epstein, C R Ramsay, B Corbacho, M Sculpher, Z H Krukowski, R C Heading, M K Campbell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite promising evidence that laparoscopic fundoplication provides better short-term relief of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) than continued medical management, uncertainty remains about whether benefits are sustained and outweigh risks.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic surgery among people with GORD requiring long-term medication and suitable for both surgical and medical management.
DESIGN: Five-year follow-up of a randomised trial (with parallel non-randomised preference groups) comparing a laparoscopic surgery-based policy with a continued medical management policy. Cost-effectiveness was assessed alongside the trial using a NHS perspective for costs and expressing health outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
SETTING: Follow-up was by annual postal questionnaire and selective hospital case notes review; initial recruitment in 21 UK hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Questionnaire responders among the 810 original participants. At entry, all had documented evidence of GORD and symptoms for > 12 months. Questionnaire response rates (years 1-5) were from 89.5% to 68.9%.
INTERVENTIONS: Three hundred and fifty-seven participants were recruited to the randomised comparison (178 randomised to surgical management and 179 randomised to continued medical management) and 453 to the preference groups (261 surgical management and 192 medical management). The surgeon chose the type of fundoplication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: disease-specific outcome measure (the REFLUX questionnaire); secondary: Short Form questionnaire-36 items (SF-36), European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), NHS resource use, reflux medication, complications.
RESULTS: The randomised groups were well balanced. By 5 years, 63% in the randomised surgical group and 13% in the randomised medical management group had received a total or partial wrap fundoplication (85% and 3% in the preference groups), with few perioperative complications and no associated deaths. At 1 year (and 5 years) after surgery, 36% (41%) in the randomised surgical group - 15% (26%) of those who had surgery - were taking proton pump inhibitor medication compared with 87% (82%) in the randomised medical group. At each year, differences in the REFLUX score significantly favoured the randomised surgical group (a third of a SD; p< 0.01 at 5 years). SF-36 and EQ-5D scores also favoured surgery, but differences attenuated over time and were generally not statistically significant at 5 years. The worse the symptoms at trial entry, the larger the benefit observed after surgery. Those randomised to medical management who subsequently had surgery had low baseline scores that markedly improved after surgery. Following fundoplication, 3% had surgical treatment for a complication and 4% had subsequent reflux-related operations - most often revision of the wrap. Dysphagia, flatulence and inability to vomit were similar in the two randomised groups. The economic analysis indicated that surgery was the more cost-effective option for this patient group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for surgery in the base case was £7028 per additional QALY; these findings were robust to changes in approaches and assumptions. The probability of surgery being cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per additional QALY was > 0.80 for all analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: After 5 years, laparoscopic fundoplication continues to provide better relief of GORD symptoms with associated improved health-related quality of life. Complications of surgery were uncommon. Despite being initially more costly, a surgical policy is highly likely to be cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15517081. FUNDING: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 17, No. 22. See the HTA programme website for further project information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23742987      PMCID: PMC4781276          DOI: 10.3310/hta17220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  21 in total

1.  Elective antireflux surgery in the US: an analysis of national trends in utilization and inpatient outcomes from 2005 to 2010.

Authors:  Luke M Funk; Aliyah Kanji; W Scott Melvin; Kyle A Perry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in the obese: what is the best surgical approach?

Authors:  Maurice-Pierre Pagé; Andrew Kastenmeier; Matthew Goldblatt; Matthew Frelich; Matthew Bosler; James Wallace; Jon Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Surgical treatment of GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sophia K McKinley; Rebecca C Dirks; Danielle Walsh; Celeste Hollands; Lauren E Arthur; Noe Rodriguez; Joyce Jhang; Ahmed Abou-Setta; Aurora Pryor; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Bethany J Slater
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Healthcare spending and utilization following antireflux surgery: examining costs and reasons for readmission.

Authors:  Kyle L Kleppe; Yiwei Xu; Luke M Funk; Xing Wang; Jeff A Havlena; Jake A Greenberg; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Economic evaluations of gastroesophageal reflux disease medical management.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Dustin D French; John E Pandolfino; Colin W Howden
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Update on novel endoscopic therapies to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease: A review.

Authors:  Jessica Hopkins; Noah J Switzer; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25

7.  Association Between Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery and Recurrence of Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Authors:  John Maret-Ouda; Karl Wahlin; Hashem B El-Serag; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Points to consider for clinical trials of the gastrointestinal tract in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Daniel E Furst; Yolanda Braun-Moscovic; Dinesh Khanna
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Charges, outcomes, and complications: a comparison of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of GERD.

Authors:  Jessica L Reynolds; Joerg Zehetner; Angela Nieh; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; Kulmeet Sandhu; Namir Katkhouda; John C Lipham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Laparoscopic fundoplication surgery versus medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults.

Authors:  Sushil K Garg; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.