BACKGROUND: The effect of age and gender on left ventricular (LV) size, muscle mass, and systolic function as determined by two-dimensional echocardiography has not yet been investigated in a large population. METHODS: Normal transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography studies of 5307 subjects (47% males) performed between March 1990 and December 2011 were analyzed. LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), LV muscle mass index (LVMMI), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and LV fractional shortening (LVFS) were compared in different age groups. RESULTS: LVMMI increased in females from 66.4 ± 1.3 g/m(2) (7-20 years) to 76.3 ± 0.9 g/m(2) (60-80 years; P < 0.0001) and in males from 81.9 ± 1.7 g/m(2) (7-20 years) to 94.6 ± 1.3 g/m(2) (60-80 years; P < 0.0001). LVEDVI decreased in females from 49.8 ± 0.9 mL/m(2) (7-20 years) to 42.8 ± 0.6 mL/m(2) (60-80 years; P < 0.0001) and in males from 56.6 ± 0.8 mL/m(2) (7-20 years) to 49.0 ± 0.7 mL/m(2) (60-80 years; P < 0.0001). A significant increase in LVEF was observed with age (P < 0.0001 for both genders), but it was more pronounced in females (62 ± 0.5% [age 7-20 years] vs. 65 ± 0.3% [age 60-80 years]) than in males (62 ± 0.5% [age 7-20 years] vs. 64 ± 0.3% [age 60-80 years]). Similarly, LVFS increased in females from 37.7 ± 0.5% (7-20 years) to 42.4 ± 0.4% (60-80 years; P < 0.001) and in males from 37.3 ± 0.5% (7-20 years) to 39.4 ± 0.5% (60-80 years; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LVEF, LVFS, and LVMMI increase with advancing age, in particular in females. In contrast, LVEDVI decreases with age. These findings indicate that the LV undergoes a lifelong remodeling.
BACKGROUND: The effect of age and gender on left ventricular (LV) size, muscle mass, and systolic function as determined by two-dimensional echocardiography has not yet been investigated in a large population. METHODS: Normal transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography studies of 5307 subjects (47% males) performed between March 1990 and December 2011 were analyzed. LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), LV muscle mass index (LVMMI), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and LV fractional shortening (LVFS) were compared in different age groups. RESULTS: LVMMI increased in females from 66.4 ± 1.3 g/m(2) (7-20 years) to 76.3 ± 0.9 g/m(2) (60-80 years; P < 0.0001) and in males from 81.9 ± 1.7 g/m(2) (7-20 years) to 94.6 ± 1.3 g/m(2) (60-80 years; P < 0.0001). LVEDVI decreased in females from 49.8 ± 0.9 mL/m(2) (7-20 years) to 42.8 ± 0.6 mL/m(2) (60-80 years; P < 0.0001) and in males from 56.6 ± 0.8 mL/m(2) (7-20 years) to 49.0 ± 0.7 mL/m(2) (60-80 years; P < 0.0001). A significant increase in LVEF was observed with age (P < 0.0001 for both genders), but it was more pronounced in females (62 ± 0.5% [age 7-20 years] vs. 65 ± 0.3% [age 60-80 years]) than in males (62 ± 0.5% [age 7-20 years] vs. 64 ± 0.3% [age 60-80 years]). Similarly, LVFS increased in females from 37.7 ± 0.5% (7-20 years) to 42.4 ± 0.4% (60-80 years; P < 0.001) and in males from 37.3 ± 0.5% (7-20 years) to 39.4 ± 0.5% (60-80 years; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LVEF, LVFS, and LVMMI increase with advancing age, in particular in females. In contrast, LVEDVI decreases with age. These findings indicate that the LV undergoes a lifelong remodeling.
Keywords:
echocardiography; elderly; left ventricular ejection fraction; left ventricular function; left ventricular remodeling; left ventricular volume
Authors: Catherine Gebhard; Monika Maredziak; Michael Messerli; Ronny R Buechel; Fay Lin; Heidi Gransar; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Daniele Andreini; Jeroen J Bax; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Ricardo C Cury; Augustin DeLago; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martin Hadamitzky; Joerg Hausleiter; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Erica Maffei; Hugo Marques; Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Gianluca Pontone; Gilbert L Raff; Ronen Rubinshtein; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; Yao Lu; Erica C Jones; Jessica M Peña; James K Min; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Jeung-Ki Yoo; Yoshiyuki Okada; Stuart A Best; Rosemary S Parker; Michinari Hieda; Benjamin D Levine; Qi Fu Journal: Menopause Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Hongwei Ji; Alan C Kwan; Melanie T Chen; David Ouyang; Joseph E Ebinger; Susan P Bell; Teemu J Niiranen; Natalie A Bello; Susan Cheng Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Yu Han; Sara A Wennersten; Julianna M Wright; R W Ludwig; Edward Lau; Maggie P Y Lam Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 5.125
Authors: Vanessa Dela Justina; Jéssica S G Miguez; Fernanda Priviero; Jennifer C Sullivan; Fernanda R Giachini; R Clinton Webb Journal: Front Aging Date: 2021-09-10
Authors: Kamil Fijorek; Felix C Tanner; Barbara E Stähli; Grzegorz Gielerak; Pawel Krzesinski; Beata Uzieblo-Zyczkowska; Pawel Smurzynski; Adam Stanczyk; Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Marek Jastrzebski; Mateusz Podolec; Grzegorz Kopec; Barbara Stanula; Maryla Kocowska; Zofia Tylutki; Sebastian Polak Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 4.132