Literature DB >> 2374218

Bladder augmentation: experience with 129 children and young adults.

W H Hendren1, R B Hendren.   

Abstract

From 1977 to 1989 bladder augmentation was performed in 56 male and 73 female patients from 1 to 35 years old (average age 12.7 years). In 59 cases augmentation was performed as part of an undiversion operation. Indications for augmentation included neurogenic bladder, severely scarred bladder from prior operations, noncompliant bladder after previous treatment of severe urethral valves, small bladder in former exstrophy patients, epispadias with a small bladder, cloacal exstrophy, and small, noncompliant bladder after therapy for cancer, trauma, cloaca and miscellaneous conditions. We used 145 bowel segments, since 16 patients had 2 bowel segments. Segments included cecum in 65 cases, sigmoid in 46, small bowel in 24, stomach in 4 and left colon in 1. The most common complication was stones. Detubularized bowel for augmentation of small noncompliant bladders allows functional reconstruction in a wide range of urological disorders that were formerly treated by diversion. Reconstruction is possible in many previously diverted patients if bladder augmentation is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2374218     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39486-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  22 in total

Review 1.  The role of imaging in pediatric bladder augmentation.

Authors:  Micheál Breen; Andrew Phelps; Carlos Estrada; Jeanne S Chow
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-04-24

2.  The use of refluxing ureter in the creation of a Mitrofanoff channel in children undergoing bladder augmentation: is a formal reimplantation necessary?

Authors:  Parag Tapre; Sudipta Sen; Jacob Chacko; Sampath Karl
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  [Urinary diversion in childhood: special attention to the long-term consequences and complications].

Authors:  R Stein; A Schröder; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Enzymatic treatment of ileal segments used for urinary tract reconstruction.

Authors:  L N Türkeri; F Simşek; A Sav; Y N Ilker; A Akdaş
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Should simultaneous ureteral reimplantation be performed during sigmoid bladder augmentation to reduce vesicoureteral reflux in neurogenic bladder cases?

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Yong Yang; Zhi-jin Wu; Ning Zhang; Chao-hua Zhang; Xiao-dong Zhang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  The use of gastrocystoplasty in patients with bladder exstrophy.

Authors:  V Di Benedetto; U Beseghi; V Bagnara; G Monfort
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Metabolic consequences of sigmoidocystoplasty in children.

Authors:  U Beseghi; J M Guys; V Dibenedetto; M Attanasio; A Ammenti; G Monfort
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Urinary tract re-functionalization after long-term diversion. A 20-year experience with 177 patients.

Authors:  W H Hendren
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Urinary diversion in children and adolescents with neurogenic bladder: the Mainz experience. Part II: Continent cutaneous diversion using the Mainz pouch I.

Authors:  Raimund Stein; Christoph Wiesner; Rolf Beetz; Jesco Pfitzenmeier; Manfred Schwarz; Joachim W Thüroff
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  Bladder augmentation: Review of the literature and recent advances.

Authors:  Serhat Gurocak; Jody Nuininga; Iyimser Ure; Robert P E De Gier; Mustafa Ozgur Tan; Wouter Feitz
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.