Literature DB >> 23742112

Cytotoxicity evaluation of electronic cigarette vapor extract on cultured mammalian fibroblasts (ClearStream-LIFE): comparison with tobacco cigarette smoke extract.

Giorgio Romagna1, Elena Allifranchini, Elena Bocchietto, Stefano Todeschi, Mara Esposito, Konstantinos E Farsalinos.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are used as alternatives to smoking; however, data on their cytotoxic potential are scarce.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cytotoxic potential of 21 EC liquids compared to the effects of cigarette smoke (CS).
METHODS: Cytotoxicity was evaluated according to UNI EN ISO 10993-5 standard. By activating an EC device, 200 mg of liquid was evaporated and was extracted in 20 ml of culture medium. CS extract from one cigarette was also produced. The extracts, undiluted (100%) and in five dilutions (50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25% and 3.125%), were applied to cultured murine fibroblasts (3T3), and viability was measured after 24-hour incubation by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Viability of less than 70% was considered cytotoxic.
RESULTS: CS extract showed cytotoxic effects at extract concentrations above 12.5% (viability: 89.1 ± 3.5% at 3.125%, 77.8 ± 1.8% at 6.25%, 72.8 ± 9.7% at 12.5%, 5.9 ± 0.9% at 25%, 9.4 ± 5.3% at 50% and 5.7 ± 0.7% at 100% extract concentration). Range of fibroblast viability for EC vapor extracts was 88.5-117.8% at 3.125%, 86.4-115.3% at 6.25%, 85.8-111.7% at 12.5%, 78.1-106.2% at 25%, 79.0-103.7% at 50% and 51.0-102.2% at 100% extract concentration. One vapor extract was cytotoxic at 100% extract concentration only (viability: 51.0 ± 2.6%). However, even for that liquid, viability was 795% higher relative to CS extract.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that EC vapor is significantly less cytotoxic compared tobacco CS. These results should be validated by clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23742112     DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2013.793439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inhal Toxicol        ISSN: 0895-8378            Impact factor:   2.724


  70 in total

1.  Distribution, quantification and toxicity of cinnamaldehyde in electronic cigarette refill fluids and aerosols.

Authors:  Rachel Z Behar; Wentai Luo; Sabrina C Lin; Yuhuan Wang; Jackelyn Valle; James F Pankow; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Negative health symptoms reported by youth e-cigarette users: Results from a national survey of US youth.

Authors:  Jessica L King; Beth A Reboussin; Julie W Merten; Kimberly D Wiseman; Kimberly G Wagoner; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Electronic cigarette liquid exposure induces flavor-dependent osteotoxicity and increases expression of a key bone marker, collagen type I.

Authors:  Claire E Otero; Jacob A Noeker; Mary M Brown; Florence D M Wavreil; Wendy A Harvey; Kristen A Mitchell; Sara J Heggland
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 4.  Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Konstantinos E Farsalinos; Riccardo Polosa
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-04

Review 5.  Cardiovascular risk of electronic cigarettes: a review of preclinical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Nicholas D Buchanan; Jacob A Grimmer; Vineeta Tanwar; Neill Schwieterman; Peter J Mohler; Loren E Wold
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 10.787

6.  Social media e-cigarette exposure and e-cigarette expectancies and use among young adults.

Authors:  Pallav Pokhrel; Pebbles Fagan; Thaddeus A Herzog; Linnea Laestadius; Wayne Buente; Crissy T Kawamoto; Hye-Ryeon Lee; Jennifer B Unger
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Adolescent Exposure to Toxic Volatile Organic Chemicals From E-Cigarettes.

Authors:  Mark L Rubinstein; Kevin Delucchi; Neal L Benowitz; Danielle E Ramo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Trends in use of electronic nicotine delivery systems by adolescents.

Authors:  Deepa R Camenga; Jennifer Delmerico; Grace Kong; Dana Cavallo; Andrew Hyland; K Michael Cummings; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Electronic cigarette aerosols and copper nanoparticles induce mitochondrial stress and promote DNA fragmentation in lung fibroblasts.

Authors:  Chad A Lerner; Pierrot Rutagarama; Tanveer Ahmad; Isaac K Sundar; Alison Elder; Irfan Rahman
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Psychosocial Factors Associated With Adolescent Electronic Cigarette and Cigarette Use.

Authors:  Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Kiros Berhane; Jennifer B Unger; Tess Boley Cruz; Jimi Huh; Adam M Leventhal; Robert Urman; Kejia Wang; Steve Howland; Tamika D Gilreath; Chih-Ping Chou; Mary Ann Pentz; Rob McConnell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.