CONTEXT: Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are used as alternatives to smoking; however, data on their cytotoxic potential are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cytotoxic potential of 21 EC liquids compared to the effects of cigarette smoke (CS). METHODS: Cytotoxicity was evaluated according to UNI EN ISO 10993-5 standard. By activating an EC device, 200 mg of liquid was evaporated and was extracted in 20 ml of culture medium. CS extract from one cigarette was also produced. The extracts, undiluted (100%) and in five dilutions (50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25% and 3.125%), were applied to cultured murine fibroblasts (3T3), and viability was measured after 24-hour incubation by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Viability of less than 70% was considered cytotoxic. RESULTS: CS extract showed cytotoxic effects at extract concentrations above 12.5% (viability: 89.1 ± 3.5% at 3.125%, 77.8 ± 1.8% at 6.25%, 72.8 ± 9.7% at 12.5%, 5.9 ± 0.9% at 25%, 9.4 ± 5.3% at 50% and 5.7 ± 0.7% at 100% extract concentration). Range of fibroblast viability for EC vapor extracts was 88.5-117.8% at 3.125%, 86.4-115.3% at 6.25%, 85.8-111.7% at 12.5%, 78.1-106.2% at 25%, 79.0-103.7% at 50% and 51.0-102.2% at 100% extract concentration. One vapor extract was cytotoxic at 100% extract concentration only (viability: 51.0 ± 2.6%). However, even for that liquid, viability was 795% higher relative to CS extract. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that EC vapor is significantly less cytotoxic compared tobacco CS. These results should be validated by clinical studies.
CONTEXT: Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are used as alternatives to smoking; however, data on their cytotoxic potential are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cytotoxic potential of 21 EC liquids compared to the effects of cigarette smoke (CS). METHODS:Cytotoxicity was evaluated according to UNI EN ISO 10993-5 standard. By activating an EC device, 200 mg of liquid was evaporated and was extracted in 20 ml of culture medium. CS extract from one cigarette was also produced. The extracts, undiluted (100%) and in five dilutions (50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25% and 3.125%), were applied to cultured murine fibroblasts (3T3), and viability was measured after 24-hour incubation by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Viability of less than 70% was considered cytotoxic. RESULTS:CS extract showed cytotoxic effects at extract concentrations above 12.5% (viability: 89.1 ± 3.5% at 3.125%, 77.8 ± 1.8% at 6.25%, 72.8 ± 9.7% at 12.5%, 5.9 ± 0.9% at 25%, 9.4 ± 5.3% at 50% and 5.7 ± 0.7% at 100% extract concentration). Range of fibroblast viability for EC vapor extracts was 88.5-117.8% at 3.125%, 86.4-115.3% at 6.25%, 85.8-111.7% at 12.5%, 78.1-106.2% at 25%, 79.0-103.7% at 50% and 51.0-102.2% at 100% extract concentration. One vapor extract was cytotoxic at 100% extract concentration only (viability: 51.0 ± 2.6%). However, even for that liquid, viability was 795% higher relative to CS extract. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that EC vapor is significantly less cytotoxic compared tobaccoCS. These results should be validated by clinical studies.
Authors: Jessica L King; Beth A Reboussin; Julie W Merten; Kimberly D Wiseman; Kimberly G Wagoner; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Claire E Otero; Jacob A Noeker; Mary M Brown; Florence D M Wavreil; Wendy A Harvey; Kristen A Mitchell; Sara J Heggland Journal: J Appl Toxicol Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 3.446
Authors: Nicholas D Buchanan; Jacob A Grimmer; Vineeta Tanwar; Neill Schwieterman; Peter J Mohler; Loren E Wold Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Deepa R Camenga; Jennifer Delmerico; Grace Kong; Dana Cavallo; Andrew Hyland; K Michael Cummings; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Chad A Lerner; Pierrot Rutagarama; Tanveer Ahmad; Isaac K Sundar; Alison Elder; Irfan Rahman Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Kiros Berhane; Jennifer B Unger; Tess Boley Cruz; Jimi Huh; Adam M Leventhal; Robert Urman; Kejia Wang; Steve Howland; Tamika D Gilreath; Chih-Ping Chou; Mary Ann Pentz; Rob McConnell Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 7.124