Literature DB >> 23742008

State-based metacognition: how time of day affects the accuracy of metamemory.

Kathleen L Hourihan1, Aaron S Benjamin.   

Abstract

Although there is an abundance of research on how stimulus characteristics and encoding conditions affect metamemory, and how those effects either do or do not mirror effects on memory, there is little research on whether and how characteristics of participants' states-like mood, fatigue, or hunger-affect metamemory. The present study examined whether metamemory ability fluctuates with time of day. Specifically, we evaluated whether learners can successfully account for the effects of time of day on their memory, and whether metacognitive monitoring is more accurate at an individual's optimal time of day. Young adults studied and recalled lists of words in both the morning and the afternoon, providing various metamemory judgements during each test session. We replicated the finding that young participants recalled more words in the afternoon than in the morning. Prior to study, participants did not predict superior recall in the afternoon, but they did after they had an opportunity to study the list (but before the test on that material). We also found that item-by-item predictions were more accurate in the afternoon, suggesting that self-regulated learning might benefit from being scheduled during times of day that accord with individuals' peak arousal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23742008      PMCID: PMC3818346          DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2013.804091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  12 in total

1.  Predicting and postdicting the effects of word frequency on memory.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-03

2.  A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms.

Authors:  J A Horne; O Ostberg
Journal:  Int J Chronobiol       Date:  1976

3.  Drugs, memory, and metamemory: a dose-effect study with lorazepam and scopolamine.

Authors:  Miriam Z Mintzer; Roland R Griffiths
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes.

Authors:  Michael E J Masson; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.

Authors:  T O Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The effectiveness of updating metacognitive knowledge in the elderly: evidence from metamnemonic judgments of word frequency.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-11-14

7.  Cognition and metacognition at extreme altitudes on Mount Everest.

Authors:  T O Nelson; J Dunlosky; D M White; J Steinberg; B D Townes; D Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-12

8.  Metamemory without the memory: are people aware of midazolam-induced amnesia?

Authors:  Paul Merritt; Elliot Hirshman; John Hsu; Michael Berrigan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Marijuana effects on long-term memory assessment and retrieval.

Authors:  C F Darley; J R Tinklenberg; W T Roth; S Vernon; B S Kopell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-05-09       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  State-dependent memory effects using caffeine and placebo do not extend to metamemory.

Authors:  William L Kelemen; Catherine E Creeley
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2003-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Caffeine Enhances Memory Performance in Young Adults during Their Non-optimal Time of Day.

Authors:  Stephanie M Sherman; Timothy P Buckley; Elsa Baena; Lee Ryan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-14

2.  Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the Contextual Memory Test in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Wan-Wen Liao; Ching-Yi Wu; Chien-Hsiou Liu; Szu-Hung Lin; Hui-Yan Chiau; Chia-Ling Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.