| Literature DB >> 23741421 |
Ying Ye1, Göran Carlsson, Monica Barr Agholme, Jenny Karlsson-Sjöberg, Tülay Yucel-Lindberg, Katrin Pütsep, Thomas Modéer.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This prospective study evaluated clinical risk indicators as well as pro- and anti- inflammatory mediators at the time of malignancy diagnosis in relation to chemotherapy-related oral mucositis in pediatric population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23741421 PMCID: PMC3669020 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Diagnoses of the patients and frequencies of oral mucositis.
| Diagnosis | All patients | Patients with oral mucositis |
| n = 104 | n = 59 | |
| n (% of all patients) | n (% of each diagnosis) | |
| Acute leukemia | 40 (39%) | 34 (85%) |
| ALL | 33 | 27 |
| AML | 7 | 7 |
| Lymphoma | 14 (13%) | 3 (21%) |
| Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma | 7 | 3 |
| Hodgkin’s lymphoma | 7 | 0 |
| Solid tumor | 50 (48%) | 22 (44%) |
| Brain tumor | 14 | 6 |
| Renal tumor | 8 | 0 |
| Soft tissue sarcoma | 8 | 5 |
| Skeletal sarcoma | 6 | 6 |
| Retinoblastoma | 6 | 0 |
| Neuroblastoma | 5 | 3 |
| Hepatoblastoma | 1 | 0 |
| Pleuropulmonary blastoma | 1 | 1 |
| Nasopharyngeal carcinoma | 1 | 1 |
ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia.
Treatment protocols containing radiation do not involve orofacial region.
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier curve of patients free from ulcerative oral mucositis with different types of malignancies.
The horizontal axis starts from the beginning of the entire chemotherapy protocol. The oral mucositis (WHO grade >1) free rate is lower in patients with acute leukemia compared to those with lymphoma (P = 0.001) or solid tumors (P = 0.001). The oral mucositis free rates are not different between patients with lymphoma and those with solid tumors (P = 0.212).
Univariable logistic regression with patient-related factors at the time of malignancy diagnosis as independent variables and oral mucositis as the outcome in all patients (n = 104).
| Variables | No oral mucositis | Oral mucositis | Univariable logistic regression | |
| n = 45 | n = 59 | OR (95% CI) |
| |
| mean ± SD | mean ± SD | |||
| Age (year) | 5.9±5.7 | 7.1±5.3 | 1.045 (0.971–1.124) | 0.238 |
| Gender (M/F) | 28/17 | 38/21 | 0.910 (0.407–2.035) | 0.819 |
| Weight (kg) | 25.4±21.8 | 29.2±20.0 | 1.009 (0.990–1.029) | 0.355 |
| Height (cm) | 109.5±39.4 | 122.0±35.4 | 1.009 (0.998–1.020) | 0.095 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 17.3±3.1 | 17.4±2.7 | 1.012 (0.882–1.161) | 0.867 |
| BMI-SDS | 0.23±1.45 | 0.25±1.25 | 1.007 (0.751–1.349) | 0.964 |
| Oral variables | ||||
| DMFT (dmft) | 0.6±1.7 | 0.4±1.1 | 0.924 (0.699–1.221) | 0.578 |
| GBI (≤15%/>15%) | 42/3 | 55/4 | 1.018 (0.216–4.797) | 0.982 |
| Diagnosis | <0.001 | |||
| Acute leukemia | 6 | 34 | 1 | |
| Lymphoma | 11 | 3 | 0.048 (0.010–0.225) | <0.001 |
| Solid tumors | 28 | 22 | 0.139 (0.049–0.389) | <0.001 |
| Other chronic disease (yes/no) | 10/35 | 17/42 | 1.417 (0.576–3.487) | 0.449 |
| Laboratory test | ||||
| Neutrophils (×109/l) | 5.2±4.8 | 3.6±4.5 | 0.925 (0.844–1.013) | 0.093 |
| Leukocyte (×109/l) | 31.6±135.3 | 43.4±106.6 | 1.001 (0.997–1.004) | 0.621 |
| Lymphocyte (×109/l) | 6.1±13.5 | 7.8±14.6 | 1.010 (0.978–1.043) | 0.558 |
| Thrombocyte (×109/l) | 364±306 | 192±157 | 0.995 (0.992–0.998) | <0.001 |
| Hemoglobin (g/l) | 112±26 | 93±30 | 0.976 (0.960–0.991) | 0.002 |
| Creatinine (µmol/l) | 35±16 | 41±19 | 1.022 (0.998–1.047) | 0.073 |
| HSV | 10/31 | 16/41 | 1.210 (0.483–3.028) | 0.684 |
| EBV | 20/22 | 30/26 | 1.269 (0.569–2.829) | 0.560 |
| CMV | 20/22 | 25/34 | 0.809 (0.365–1.793) | 0.601 |
BMI, body mass index; BMI-SDS, BMI-standard deviation scores; DMFT (dmft), decayed, missing or filled teeth; GBI, gingival bleeding index; HSV, herpes simplex virus; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; CMV, cytomegalovirus; SD, standard deviation; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Blood antibody reactivity or PCR analysis. Data of HSV in six patients, EBV in six patients, and CMV in three patients were not available.
P<0.01,
P<0.001.
Univariable logistic regression with treatment-related factors during chemotherapy as independent variables and oral mucositis as the outcome in all patients (n = 104).
| Variables | No oral mucositis | Oral mucositis | Univariable logistic regression | |
| n = 45 | n = 59 | OR (95% CI) |
| |
| n (%) | n (%) | |||
| Cytostatic regimen | ||||
| Methotrexate | 11 (24%) | 34 (58%) | 4.204 (1.790–9.872) | 0.001 |
| Doxorubicin | 27 (60%) | 24 (41%) | 0.457 (0.207–1.008) | 0.052 |
| Cytarabine | 10 (22%) | 18 (31%) | 1.537 (0.628–3.761) | 0.347 |
| Cyclophosphamide | 20 (44%) | 14 (24%) | 0.389 (0.168–0.901) | 0.028 |
| Actinomycin D | 11 (24%) | 2 (3%) | 0.108 (0.023–0.519) | 0.005 |
| Cisplatin | 19 (42%) | 4 (7%) | 0.100 (0.031–0.322) | <0.001 |
| Etoposide | 22 (49%) | 11 (19%) | 0.240 (0.100–0.576) | 0.001 |
| Hematological side effect | ||||
| Neutropenia (<0.5×109/l) | 33 (73%) | 48 (81%) | 1.587 (0.626–4.024) | 0.331 |
| Thrombocytopenia (<50×109/l) | 19 (42%) | 36 (61%) | 2.142 (0.972–4.718) | 0.059 |
| Lymphopenia (<1.0×109/l) | 28 (62%) | 48 (81%) | 2.649 (1.088–6.453) | 0.032 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Variables with OR <1 were not included in multivariable analysis since cytostatic regimens can only be considered as risk indicators for oral mucositis.
P<0.05,
P<0.01.
Multivariable logistic regression with oral mucositis as the outcome in all patients (n = 104).
| Variables | Unadjusted | Adjusted for methotrexate | ||
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Diagnosis | <0.001 | 0.001 | ||
| Acute leukemia | 1 | 1 | ||
| Lymphoma | 0.048 (0.010–0.225) | <0.001 | 0.054 (0.011–0.259) | <0.001 |
| Solid tumors | 0.139 (0.049–0.389) | <0.001 | 0.240 (0.075–0.765) | 0.016 |
| Methotrexate | – | 0.052 | 2.879 (0.966–8.580) | 0.058 |
| Thrombocyte | – | 0.295 | – | – |
| Hemoglobin | – | 0.845 | – | – |
| Lymphopenia | – | 0.666 | – | – |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Variables that have significant difference in the univariable analysis (Table 2 and 3) are included.
Variables that are removed from the logistic regression equation in the unadjusted model.
P<0.05,
P<0.01,
P<0.001.
Plasma pro-LL-37 (%)a and cytokines (pg/ml) at the time of malignancy diagnosis in patients (n = 35) with different malignancy diagnosis.
| Variables | Acute leukemia | Lymphoma or solid tumors |
|
| n = 15 | n = 20 | ||
| median (range) | median (range) | ||
| Pro-LL-37 | 1 (0–26) | 49 (2–314) | <0.001 |
| IL-1β | 1.7 (0.0–5.0) | 0.8 (0.0–11.0) | 1.000 |
| IL-4 | 2.2 (0.0–61.0) | 0.5 (0.0–7.5) | 1.000 |
| IL-6 | 10.9 (0.0–89.3) | 0.8 (0.0–22.1) | 0.009 |
| IL-8 | 15.6 (6.5–51.4) | 1.7 (1.7–13.7) | <0.001 |
| IL-10 | 14.3 (1.8–1161.9) | 3.7 (0.7–13.9) | 0.018 |
| IL-17 | 3.1 (0.0–42.7) | 0.0 (0.0–24.9) | 0.360 |
| IFN-γ | 5.6 (0.0–63.5) | 0.4 (0.0–61.8) | 0.378 |
| TNF-α | 6.8 (0.0–59.8) | 0.0 (0.0–7.0) | 0.018 |
Percentage of the standard.
Cytokine concentrations were tested on 14 patients.
There was no plasma parameter different between lymphoma and solid tumors.
Mann-Whitney test with P-value adjusted with Bonferroni method.
P<0.05;
P<0.01;
P<0.001.