Literature DB >> 23741053

Influence of pacing site characteristics on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Jorge A Wong1, Raymond Yee, John Stirrat, David Scholl, Andrew D Krahn, Lorne J Gula, Allan C Skanes, Peter Leong-Sit, George J Klein, David McCarty, Nowell Fine, Aashish Goela, Ali Islam, Terry Thompson, Maria Drangova, James A White.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transmural scar occupying left ventricular (LV) pacing regions has been associated with reduced response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, spatial influences of lead tip delivery relative to scar at both pacing sites remain poorly explored. This study evaluated scar distribution relative to LV and right ventricular (RV) lead tip placement through coregistration of late gadolinium enhancement MRI and cardiac computed tomographic (CT) findings. Influences on CRT response were assessed by serial echocardiography. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Sixty patients receiving CRT underwent preimplant late gadolinium enhancement MRI, postimplant cardiac CT, and serial echocardiography. Blinded segmental evaluations of mechanical delay, percentage scar burden, and lead tip location were performed. Response to CRT was defined as a reduction in LV end-systolic volume ≥15% at 6 months. The mean age and LV ejection fraction were 64±9 years and 25±7%, respectively. Mean scar volume was higher among CRT nonresponders for both the LV (23±23% versus 8±14% [P=0.01]) and RV pacing regions (40±32% versus 24±30% [P=0.04]). Significant pacing region scar was identified in 13% of LV pacing regions and 37% of RV pacing regions. Absence of scar in both regions was associated with an 81% response rate compared with 55%, 25%, and 0%, respectively, when the RV, LV, or both pacing regions contained scar. LV pacing region dyssynchrony was not predictive of response.
CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial scar occupying the LV pacing region is associated with nonresponse to CRT. Scar occupying the RV pacing region is encountered at higher frequency and seems to provide a more intermediate influence on CRT response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac MRI; cardiac computed tomography; cardiac resynchronization therapy; cicatrix; dyssynchrony; late gadolinium enhancement; response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23741053     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.000146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  16 in total

1.  Associations between scar characteristics by cardiac magnetic resonance and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in primary prevention defibrillator recipients.

Authors:  Yiyi Zhang; Eliseo Guallar; Robert G Weiss; Michael Stillabower; Gary Gerstenblith; Gordon F Tomaselli; Katherine C Wu
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 2.  ICE Guided CRT: Is there Evidence of Reverse Remodeling?

Authors:  Antonio Rossillo; Angelo B Ramondo
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

3.  Validation of an automatic diagnosis of strict left bundle branch block criteria using 12-lead electrocardiograms.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Xia; Anne-Christine Ruwald; Martin H Ruwald; Nene Ugoeke; Barbara Szepietowska; Valentina Kutyifa; Mehmet K Aktas; Poul Erik B Thomsen; Wojciech Zareba; Arthur J Moss; Jean-Philippe Couderc
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Leadless Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy: Advances, Challenges and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nadeev Wijesuriya; Mark K Elliott; Vishal Mehta; Baldeep S Sidhu; Marina Strocchi; Jonathan M Behar; Steven Niederer; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 5.  Clinical Assessment and Implication of Left Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony in Patients with Heart Failure.

Authors:  Yi-Hsin Chan; Chun-Li Wang; Chi-Tai Kuo; Yung-Hsin Yeh; Chia-Tung Wu; Lung-Sheng Wu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.672

6.  Relationship between mechanical dyssynchrony and intra-operative electrical delay times in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan D Suever; Gregory R Hartlage; R Patrick Magrath; Shahriar Iravanian; Michael S Lloyd; John N Oshinski
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Predictors of Total Mortality and Echocardiographic Response for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Guilherme Ferreira Gazzoni; Matheus Bom Fraga; Andres Di Leoni Ferrari; Pablo da Costa Soliz; Anibal Pires Borges; Eduardo Bartholomay; Carlos Antonio Abunader Kalil; Vanessa Giaretta; Luis Eduardo Paim Rohde
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 8.  Assessment of stable coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: Current and emerging techniques.

Authors:  James R J Foley; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-26

9.  Influence of phase correction of late gadolinium enhancement images on scar signal quantification in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  John Stirrat; Sebastien Xavier Joncas; Michael Salerno; Maria Drangova; James White
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Echocardiography and cardiac resynchronisation therapy, friends or foes?

Authors:  W M van Everdingen; J C Schipper; J van 't Sant; K Ramdat Misier; M Meine; M J Cramer
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.