Literature DB >> 23740467

Sex differences in attraction to familiar and unfamiliar opposite-sex faces: men prefer novelty and women prefer familiarity.

Anthony C Little1, Lisa M DeBruine, Benedict C Jones.   

Abstract

Familiarity is attractive in many types of stimuli and exposure generally increases feelings of liking. However, men desire a greater number of sexual partners than women, suggesting a preference for novelty. We examined sex differences in preferences for familiarity. In Study 1 (N = 83 women, 63 men), we exposed individuals to faces twice and found that faces were judged as more attractive on the second rating, reflecting attraction to familiar faces, with the exception that men's ratings of female faces decreased on the second rating, demonstrating attraction to novelty. In Studies 2 (N = 42 women, 28 men) and 3 (N = 51 women, 25 men), exposure particularly decreased men's ratings of women's attractiveness for short-term relationships and their sexiness. In Study 4 (N = 64 women, 50 men), women's attraction to faces was positively related to self-rated similarity to their current partner's face, while the effect was significantly weaker for men. Potentially, men's attraction to novelty may reflect an adaptation promoting the acquisition of a high number of sexual partners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23740467     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-013-0120-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  8 in total

1.  From likely to likable: The role of statistical typicality in human social assessment of faces.

Authors:  Chaitanya K Ryali; Stanny Goffin; Piotr Winkielman; Angela J Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Experimental Evidence for Sex Differences in Sexual Variety Preferences: Support for the Coolidge Effect in Humans.

Authors:  Susan M Hughes; Toe Aung; Marissa A Harrison; Jack N LaFayette; Gordon G Gallup
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-05-21

3.  Foundations of Erobotics.

Authors:  Simon Dubé; Dave Anctil
Journal:  Int J Soc Robot       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.126

4.  Negative frequency-dependent preferences and variation in male facial hair.

Authors:  Zinnia J Janif; Robert C Brooks; Barnaby J Dixson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  The Great Porn Experiment V2.0: Sexual Arousal Reduces the Salience of Familiar Women When Heterosexual Men Judge Their Attractiveness.

Authors:  Jordan Sculley; Christopher D Watkins
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-07-05

6.  How do you say 'hello'? Personality impressions from brief novel voices.

Authors:  Phil McAleer; Alexander Todorov; Pascal Belin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How Beauty Determines Gaze! Facial Attractiveness and Gaze Duration in Images of Real World Scenes.

Authors:  Helmut Leder; Aleksandra Mitrovic; Jürgen Goller
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-08-23

8.  Beauty is in the belief of the beholder: cognitive influences on the neural response to facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Ravi Thiruchselvam; Jessica Harper; Abigail L Homer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.436

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.