IMPORTANCE: The role of interval appendectomy after conservative management of perforated appendicitis remains controversial. Determining the etiology of perforated appendicitis is one reason to perform interval appendectomies. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adult patients undergoing interval appendectomy experience an increased rate of neoplasms. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A single tertiary care institution. PARTICIPANTS: All patients 18 years or older who underwent appendectomy for presumed appendicitis from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2010. EXPOSURES Appendectomy for presumed appendicitis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Underlying neoplasm as the cause of presentation for presumed appendicitis. Demographic data, clinicopathologic characteristics, interval resection rate, and complication data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: During the study period, 376 patients underwent appendectomies. Interval appendectomy was performed in 17 patients (4.5%). Neoplasms were identified in 14 patients (3.7%); 5 of those tumors occurred in patients who had undergone interval appendectomy (29.4%). Nine neoplasms were mucinous tumors (64.3%), including all neoplasms associated with interval appendectomies. The mean age of all patients with appendiceal tumors was 49 years (range, 35-74 years). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix were found in 5 of 17 patients (29.4%) undergoing interval appendectomy. Interval appendectomies should be considered in all adult patients, especially those 40 years or older, to determine the underlying cause of appendicitis. A multi-institutional study to determine the generalizability of these findings is warranted.
IMPORTANCE: The role of interval appendectomy after conservative management of perforated appendicitis remains controversial. Determining the etiology of perforated appendicitis is one reason to perform interval appendectomies. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adult patients undergoing interval appendectomy experience an increased rate of neoplasms. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A single tertiary care institution. PARTICIPANTS: All patients 18 years or older who underwent appendectomy for presumed appendicitis from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2010. EXPOSURES Appendectomy for presumed appendicitis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Underlying neoplasm as the cause of presentation for presumed appendicitis. Demographic data, clinicopathologic characteristics, interval resection rate, and complication data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: During the study period, 376 patients underwent appendectomies. Interval appendectomy was performed in 17 patients (4.5%). Neoplasms were identified in 14 patients (3.7%); 5 of those tumors occurred in patients who had undergone interval appendectomy (29.4%). Nine neoplasms were mucinous tumors (64.3%), including all neoplasms associated with interval appendectomies. The mean age of all patients with appendiceal tumors was 49 years (range, 35-74 years). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix were found in 5 of 17 patients (29.4%) undergoing interval appendectomy. Interval appendectomies should be considered in all adult patients, especially those 40 years or older, to determine the underlying cause of appendicitis. A multi-institutional study to determine the generalizability of these findings is warranted.
Authors: J de Jonge; M D M Bolmers; G D Musters; C C van Rossem; W A Bemelman; A A W van Geloven Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Tyler J Loftus; Steven L Raymond; George A Sarosi; Chasen A Croft; R Stephen Smith; Philip A Efron; Frederick A Moore; Scott C Brakenridge; Alicia M Mohr; Janeen R Jordan Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Maximilian Brunner; Philipp Lapins; Melanie Langheinrich; Justus Baecker; Christian Krautz; Stephan Kersting; Georg F Weber; Robert Grützmann; Matthias Maak Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Nathaniel Yohannes; Jaclyn C Watkins; Amy G Weeks; Sarah S Osmundson; Chanjuan Shi; Alexandra E Kovach Journal: Int J Gynecol Pathol Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 2.762