UNLABELLED: Hypoxia is a significant therapeutic problem for solid tumors because hypoxic cells are treatment-resistant and more aggressive. Hypoxia-activated prodrugs such as SN30000 use a mechanism of activation in hypoxic cells similar to that of 2-nitroimidazole hypoxia PET tracers. Therefore, we have evaluated the usefulness of 2-(2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-(18)F-pentafluoropropyl)-acetamide ((18)F-EF5) PET to monitor and predict tumor response to SN30000 plus radiation treatment (RT). METHODS: Human non-small cell lung cancer xenografts (H460) in athymic rats were imaged with (18)F-EF5 PET before and after treatment with SN30000 (90 mg/kg), with or without 15-Gy RT. The feasibility of imaging early changes in hypoxia in response to SN30000 was examined 24 h after treatment, followed by ex vivo γ-counting and immunohistochemical examination to study drug-induced apoptosis. Subsequently, the therapeutic effects of SN30000 with or without RT were evaluated in tumor growth delay studies and compared with early treatment-induced changes observed by (18)F-EF5 PET. Changes in tumor hemoglobin oxygen saturation as a function of time after treatment measured by optical spectroscopy were compared with PET data. RESULTS: The uptake of (18)F-EF5 was significantly lower in SN30000-treated tumors than in saline controls 24 h after treatment (mean standardized uptake value, 0.44 ± 0.08 vs. 0.56 ± 0.08 for control group; P < 0.05). Apoptosis was significantly higher in SN30000-treated tumors than in controls. Early treatment-induced changes in (18)F-EF5 uptake were indicative of tumor response in growth delay studies at the group level. SN30000 plus RT significantly decreased (18)F-EF5 uptake relative to baseline and resulted in complete tumor remission in 5 of 7 animals. SN30000 alone decreased (18)F-EF5 uptake, generally in tumors with high initial standardized uptake values, and showed a minor tumor growth delay effect. The changes induced by SN30000 with or without RT in (18)F-EF5 uptake correlated with baseline hypoxia levels. RT caused significant increases in tumor oxygen concentration and hemoglobin oxygen saturation. CONCLUSION: A hypoxia PET imaging agent can measure changes in tumor hypoxic fraction in response to SN30000. These results suggest the utility of (18)F-EF5 PET for monitoring early response to tumor treatment with SN30000 plus RT in the clinical development of this novel hypoxia-activated prodrug.
UNLABELLED: Hypoxia is a significant therapeutic problem for solid tumors because hypoxic cells are treatment-resistant and more aggressive. Hypoxia-activated prodrugs such as SN30000 use a mechanism of activation in hypoxic cells similar to that of 2-nitroimidazolehypoxia PET tracers. Therefore, we have evaluated the usefulness of 2-(2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-(18)F-pentafluoropropyl)-acetamide ((18)F-EF5) PET to monitor and predict tumor response to SN30000 plus radiation treatment (RT). METHODS:Humannon-small cell lung cancer xenografts (H460) in athymic rats were imaged with (18)F-EF5 PET before and after treatment with SN30000 (90 mg/kg), with or without 15-Gy RT. The feasibility of imaging early changes in hypoxia in response to SN30000 was examined 24 h after treatment, followed by ex vivo γ-counting and immunohistochemical examination to study drug-induced apoptosis. Subsequently, the therapeutic effects of SN30000 with or without RT were evaluated in tumor growth delay studies and compared with early treatment-induced changes observed by (18)F-EF5 PET. Changes in tumor hemoglobin oxygen saturation as a function of time after treatment measured by optical spectroscopy were compared with PET data. RESULTS: The uptake of (18)F-EF5 was significantly lower in SN30000-treated tumors than in saline controls 24 h after treatment (mean standardized uptake value, 0.44 ± 0.08 vs. 0.56 ± 0.08 for control group; P < 0.05). Apoptosis was significantly higher in SN30000-treated tumors than in controls. Early treatment-induced changes in (18)F-EF5 uptake were indicative of tumor response in growth delay studies at the group level. SN30000 plus RT significantly decreased (18)F-EF5 uptake relative to baseline and resulted in complete tumor remission in 5 of 7 animals. SN30000 alone decreased (18)F-EF5 uptake, generally in tumors with high initial standardized uptake values, and showed a minor tumor growth delay effect. The changes induced by SN30000 with or without RT in (18)F-EF5 uptake correlated with baseline hypoxia levels. RT caused significant increases in tumoroxygen concentration and hemoglobin oxygen saturation. CONCLUSION: A hypoxia PET imaging agent can measure changes in tumor hypoxic fraction in response to SN30000. These results suggest the utility of (18)F-EF5 PET for monitoring early response to tumor treatment with SN30000 plus RT in the clinical development of this novel hypoxia-activated prodrug.
Authors: Corneline J Hoekstra; Sigrid G Stroobants; Egbert F Smit; Johan Vansteenkiste; Harm van Tinteren; Pieter E Postmus; Richard P Golding; Bonne Biesma; Frans J H M Schramel; Nico van Zandwijk; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Otto S Hoekstra Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sydney M Evans; Douglas Fraker; Stephen M Hahn; Kristen Gleason; W Timothy Jenkins; Kevin Jenkins; Wei-Ting Hwang; Paul Zhang; Rosemarie Mick; Cameron J Koch Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Danny Rischin; Lester Peters; Richard Fisher; Andrew Macann; Jim Denham; Michael Poulsen; Michael Jackson; Lizbeth Kenny; Michael Penniment; June Corry; David Lamb; Bev McClure Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sydney M Evans; Kevin D Judy; Isolde Dunphy; W Timothy Jenkins; Wei-Ting Hwang; Peter T Nelson; Robert A Lustig; Kevin Jenkins; Deirdre P Magarelli; Stephen M Hahn; Ruth A Collins; M Sean Grady; Cameron J Koch Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: W J Koh; K S Bergman; J S Rasey; L M Peterson; M L Evans; M M Graham; J R Grierson; K L Lindsley; T K Lewellen; K A Krohn Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1995-09-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Xinjian Mao; Sarah McManaway; Jagdish K Jaiswal; Cho R Hong; William R Wilson; Kevin O Hicks Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2019-05-26 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Boris Epel; Matthew C Maggio; Eugene D Barth; Richard C Miller; Charles A Pelizzari; Martyna Krzykawska-Serda; Subramanian V Sundramoorthy; Bulent Aydogan; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Victor M Tormyshev; Howard J Halpern Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Connie Yip; Philip J Blower; Vicky Goh; David B Landau; Gary J R Cook Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-02-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Rehan Ali; Sandeep Apte; Marta Vilalta; Murugesan Subbarayan; Zheng Miao; Frederick T Chin; Edward E Graves Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-02 Impact factor: 3.240