Frogs have been used as an alternative model to study pain mechanisms. Since we did not find any reports on the effects of sciatic nerve transection (SNT) on the ultrastructure and pattern of metabolic substances in frog dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells, in the present study, 18 adult male frogs (Rana catesbeiana) were divided into three experimental groups: naive (frogs not subjected to surgical manipulation), sham (frogs in which all surgical procedures to expose the sciatic nerve were used except transection of the nerve), and SNT (frogs in which the sciatic nerve was exposed and transected). After 3 days, the bilateral DRG of the sciatic nerve was collected and used for transmission electron microscopy. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect reactivity for glucose transporter (Glut) types 1 and 3, tyrosine hydroxylase, serotonin and c-Fos, as well as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate diaphorase (NADPH-diaphorase). SNT induced more mitochondria with vacuolation in neurons, satellite glial cells (SGCs) with more cytoplasmic extensions emerging from cell bodies, as well as more ribosomes, rough endoplasmic reticulum, intermediate filaments and mitochondria. c-Fos immunoreactivity was found in neuronal nuclei. More neurons and SGCs surrounded by tyrosine hydroxylase-like immunoreactivity were found. No change occurred in serotonin- and Glut1- and Glut3-like immunoreactivity. NADPH-diaphorase occurred in more neurons and SGCs. No sign of SGC proliferation was observed. Since the changes of frog DRG in response to nerve injury are similar to those of mammals, frogs should be a valid experimental model for the study of the effects of SNT, a condition that still has many unanswered questions.
Frogs have been used as an alternative model to study pain mechanisms. Since we did not find any reports on the effects of sciatic nerve transection (SNT) on the ultrastructure and pattern of metabolic substances in frog dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells, in the present study, 18 adult male frogs (Rana catesbeiana) were divided into three experimental groups: naive (frogs not subjected to surgical manipulation), sham (frogs in which all surgical procedures to expose the sciatic nerve were used except transection of the nerve), and SNT (frogs in which the sciatic nerve was exposed and transected). After 3 days, the bilateral DRG of the sciatic nerve was collected and used for transmission electron microscopy. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect reactivity for glucose transporter (Glut) types 1 and 3, tyrosine hydroxylase, serotonin and c-Fos, as well as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate diaphorase (NADPH-diaphorase). SNT induced more mitochondria with vacuolation in neurons, satellite glial cells (SGCs) with more cytoplasmic extensions emerging from cell bodies, as well as more ribosomes, rough endoplasmic reticulum, intermediate filaments and mitochondria. c-Fos immunoreactivity was found in neuronal nuclei. More neurons and SGCs surrounded by tyrosine hydroxylase-like immunoreactivity were found. No change occurred in serotonin- and Glut1- and Glut3-like immunoreactivity. NADPH-diaphorase occurred in more neurons and SGCs. No sign of SGC proliferation was observed. Since the changes of frog DRG in response to nerve injury are similar to those of mammals, frogs should be a valid experimental model for the study of the effects of SNT, a condition that still has many unanswered questions.
In amphibians, as in mammals, the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is composed of three
classes of neurons classified according to morphology and function. In addition to
neurons, myelinated and unmyelinated fibers, macrophages, fibroblasts, and satellite
glial cells (SGCs) are also resident components (1, 2). In this ganglion some
neurons show reactivity to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate diaphorase
(NADPH-diaphorase) (3, 4), which is considered to be equivalent to nitric oxide (NO)
synthase, the enzyme responsible for NO synthesis (5). DRG cells also respond to application of serotonin (6, 7)
and catecholamine (8).Amphibians have been used as a model for the study of pain mechanisms (9-15).
The reasons for using amphibians in pain research are varied. According to Stevens
(9), the use of these animals provides a
phylogenetic perspective on the mechanisms of pain research. Other issues include
the simplicity of the amphibian central nervous system, the economic advantage of
using these animals, and ethical considerations about conducting pain research in
non-mammalian vertebrate species. In this context, frog spinal cord and DRG have
been used to demonstrate the changes in different neurotransmitters and
neuropeptides after sciatic nerve transection (SNT), one of the models that mimic
the clinical conditions of neuropathic pain (16-18). These studies reported
alterations that shared similarities with those observed in mammals, while others
were unique to this animal species. Moreover, further studies are necessary to
better understand the effects of SNT on frog nervous tissue to support the use of
this model in this experimental condition.In mammals, serotonin transporterdeficiency attenuated the mechanical allodynia and
heat hyperalgesia, symptoms frequently observed in neuropathic pain (19). Tyrosine hydroxylase, a rate-limiting
enzyme responsible for catalyzing the conversion of L-tyrosine to the precursor of
dopamine and then norepinephrine and epinephrine, shows changes in its
immunoreactivity pattern in DRG cells after SNT (20). Glucose transport (Glut) also appears to be modulated by noxious
stimuli and denervation (21). These
experimental conditions upregulated c-Fos, a protein that is regarded as a marker of
neural activation by noxious stimulation (22). SNT also increases NADPH-diaphorase staining in mammalian DRG cells
(23, 24). SGCs, cells that support DRG neurons both physically and
metabolically (25), also change their
ultrastructure after peripheral nerve lesion (26).In order to elucidate the effects of SNT on the ultrastructure and pattern of
metabolic substances in bullfrog DRG cells, we used transmission electron microscopy
to reveal the effects on the ultrastructure of these cells, and light microscopy to
demonstrate the distribution of NADPH-diaphorase reaction and the pattern of Glut1-
and Glut3-, serotonin-, tyrosine hydroxylase-, and c-Fos-like immunoreactivity. The
experiment was performed 3 days after SNT because previous studies demonstrated that
the functional changes in frog nervous tissue are already present 3 days after
axotomy (16-18). We think that these findings will determine if these responses are
similar across amphibians and mammals, potentially increasing our knowledge of the
effects of SNT on frog nervous tissue.
Material and Methods
Animals
Eighteen adult male frogs, Rana catesbeiana, weighing 100-200'g
were obtained from Ranasul (Brazil). Upon arrival at the laboratory they were
housed in cages with water and kept under natural conditions of temperature and
photoperiod. The animals were fed specific food ad libitum and
acclimated to laboratory conditions for at least 2 weeks before being used. They
were divided into 3 experimental groups of 6 animals each: naive (animals did
not undergo surgical manipulation), sham (animals in which all surgical
procedures to expose the sciatic nerve were used except transection of this
nerve), and SNT (animals in which the sciatic nerve was exposed and transected).
For the surgical procedures, frogs were anesthetized intramuscularly with 3%
prilocaine (Prilonest®, DFL Indústria e Comêrcio S.A., Brazil;
0.1'mL/100'g body weight). In the SNT group, the right sciatic nerve was exposed
and transected approximately 5'mm distal to the sciatic notch. Flexion and
ocular reflexes were used to monitor the anesthesic effect. After surgery, the
muscle and skin layer were immediately sutured with thread and a topical
antibiotic was applied. The animals were killed 3 days after the procedure. The
experimental protocol followed the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals (NIH publication 85-23, revised 1985) and was approved by the
Neuroscience Graduate Committee of Instituto de Ciências Básicas da Saúde,
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Transmission electron microscopy
The bilateral DRG of the sciatic nerve were dissected out within 3'min after frog
decapitation. They were fixed immediately by immersion in 2% paraformaldehyde,
1.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma, USA) and 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB), pH'7.3, for
1'h. The material was washed in the same buffer and postfixed in 1% osmium
tetroxide (Sigma) diluted in PB for 1'h at room temperature. Next, the sections
were washed in PB and subsequently dehydrated with an ascending series of
acetone, and then embedded in Araldite (Durcupan, Fluka, Switzerland). Semithin
sections (1'µM) were obtained using an ultramicrotome (MT6000-XL, RMC, USA) with
a diamond knife (Diatome, Switzerland) and stained with 1% toluidine blue for
examination under a light microscope. Ultrathin sections (70'nm) were cut with
the same ultramicrotome using a diamond knife (Drukker, The Netherlands). These
sections were stained with 2% uranyl acetate (Merck, Germany) followed by 1%
lead citrate and examined with a JEM 120 EX II electron microscope (Joel,
Japan).
Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry
For the NADPH-diaphorase and immunohistochemical procedure, the frogs were
decerebrated and after a brief saline flush they were perfused intracardially
with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PB, pH'7.4. The DRG were quickly dissected
out, immersed in the same fixative solution for 4'h and then cryoprotected in 15
and 30% sucrose solutions in PB at 4°C. Serial coronal sections (50'µM) were
obtained with a cryostat and collected in cold phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS).For the NADPH-diaphorase procedure, free-floating sections were pre-incubated in
10'mL PB containing 12'µL Triton X-100 for 10'min. The sections were then
transferred to fresh NADPH-diaphorase medium containing 0.5'mg/mL β-NADPH,
0.2'mg/mL nitroblue tetrazolium, and 0.2 M PB containing 12'µL Triton X-100.
After pre-incubation at room temperature for 5'min under continuous shaking,
they were incubated at 37°C for 4'h. The reaction was stopped by the addition of
excess 0.1 M PB. Control sections were incubated in a reaction medium without
substrate.For immunohistochemistry, the sections were treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide in
10% methanol for 30'min, washed with PBS for a further 30'min and incubated for
30'min in 3% normal goat serum in PBS containing 0.4% Triton X-100 (PBS-T). The
sections were incubated overnight with gentle shaking at 4°C with a primary
antibody [c-Fos, a polyclonal antibody against 4-17 amino acids, diluted 1:700
(Calbiochem, Germany); Glut1, a polyclonal antibody that recognizes ∼42- to
45-kDa protein, diluted 1:1000 (Sigma); Glut3, a polyclonal antibody that
recognizes the C-terminal sequence of the protein, diluted 1:1000 (Sigma);
serotonin, a polyclonal antibody diluted 1:1200 (Sigma); tyrosine hydroxylase, a
polyclonal antibody diluted 1:1000 (Calbiochem)]. The primary antibody was then
removed and the sections washed in PBS-T for 30'min. The sections were then
immersed in a secondary antibody (anti-IgG, Sigma), diluted 1:50 in PBS-T for
2'h at room temperature with gentle shaking. After washing with PBS-T for
30'min, a peroxidase anti-peroxidase soluble complex andibody (Sigma) diluted
1:500 was applied for 2'h at room temperature. The samples were then washed in
PBS and incubated in a solution of 3,3"-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride
(60'mg/100'mL, Sigma) and 0.005% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide in PBS. Specific
immunostaining was abolished when the primary antibody was omitted from the
staining sequence.After the histochemical and immunohistochemical procedures, the sections were
mounted onto gelatinized slides, dehydrated, cleared, and covered with Entellan
(Merck). The sections were examined and photographed with a Nikon Optiphot-2
microscope equipped with a Nikon FX-35DX camera (Japan).
Results
In naive animals, DRG neurons had a typical aspect. Ultrastructurally, some neurons
exhibited electron-dense cytoplasm while others showed intermediate electron
densities. Neuronal cell bodies (Figure 1A)
were ensheathed by SGCs. Sometimes only a thin ring of SGC cytoplasm was observed
around the soma of the sensory neuron (Figure
1B). In the SGC cytoplasm, there were well-developed rough endoplasmic
reticulum (RER), ribosomes and mitochondria (Figures
1 and 2A-C). Polyribosomes with
characteristic rosettes were also found. SGCs had a fusiform shape and were
separated from adjacent neurons by a space of about 20'nm. Lamellar cytoplasmic
expansions emerging from SGCs and projections from neurons were commonly observed in
this space (Figure 1A,B).
Figure 1
Cross-section of a naive (A, B) and
transected (C, D) Rana
catesbeiana's dorsal root ganglion. A, Nuclear
satellite glial cells (NSGC) close to a sensory neuron (NEU).
B, Lamellar cytoplasmic expansions (Le) from a
satellite glial cell near the neuronal projection (NPL). C,
Sensory NEU in the chromatolysis process. Note the mitochondrial (M)
accumulation in the neuronal cytoplasm and the characteristic chromatin
condensation in the NSGC. D, Sensory NEU in the
chromatolysis process and vacuolated M. Scale bars: A
(0.2'µm); B (5'µm), C and
D (2'µm).
Figure 2
Cross-section of a naive (A, B,
C) and transected (D,
E, F) Rana
catesbeiana's dorsal root ganglion. A, Nuclear
satellite glial cells (NSGC) with chromatin condensation and heterochromatin
attached to the nuclear membrane. Note mitochondria (M) with an intracristal
space of normal aspect. B and C, Ribosomes
(R), rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) and intermediate filaments (F) in the
cytoplasm of satellite glial cell (SGC). Note the lamellar cytoplasmic
expansion (Le) emerging from SGC. D, Nucleus of SGC of
normal aspect 3 days after sciatic nerve transection. Note the greater
number of M (D), RER (E) and F
(F) in SGC cytoplasm. MC = tranverse mitochondrial
cristae. Scale bars: A, B,
C = 0.5'µm; E and F =
1'µm; D = 0.2'µm.
Three days after SNT, several sensory neurons showed increased size, mitochondrial
accumulation, and vacuolation in their cytoplasm (Figure 1C). Some mitochondria were so dilated and vacuolated that there
were empty spaces (Figure 1D). The nuclei of
these neurons began to take an irregular shape. SGCs did not show these changes. The
nucleus of SGCs showed a characteristic chromatin condensation, with heterochromatin
attached to the nuclear membrane. The nuclear envelope showed regular outlines and
no changes were observed in its pores (Figure
2D). A 10-12-nm thick plasma membrane was observed in SGCs and no
interruptions along this membrane were seen. Although no statistical analysis was
performed, more ribosomes, RER, intermediate filaments, and mitochondria were
observed in SGC cytoplasm (Figure 2D-F). Many
free ribosomes, polysomes, RER and mitochondria were evenly distributed throughout
the SGC cytoplasm, while intermediate filaments (8-10'nm in diameter) were more
common in the perinuclear region, which seemed to form a very dense network.
Mitochondria and RER generally appeared normal. Mitochondria showed intracristal
spaces of normal aspect. While in most cells the RER showed the usual features,
sometimes it appeared to be a little dilated. Many lamellar cytoplasmic expansions
emerged from SGCs. These expansions had different diameters and lengths and assumed
an irregular shape (Figure 3). Although no
statistical analysis was performed, the number of SGCs did not seem to be altered
after SNT. In the DRG of sham animals, no ultrastructural change was seen in
ganglion cells (data not shown).
Figure 3
Cross-section of a Rana catesbeiana's dorsal root
ganglion 3 days after sciatic nerve transection. Lamellar cytoplasmic
expansions (Le) from the cytoplasm of a satellite glial cell (SGC) can be
seen, spreading through the interstitial space toward the projections that
depart from the neuronal body (NEU). Note chromatin condensation of the
nuclear SGC (NSGC). Scale bar = 2'µm.
In naive animals, a strong NADPH-diaphorase reaction occurred in medium and small
neurons and in SGCs. In neurons, the positive reaction was more common in
medium-sized neurons. The positive SGCs surrounded either positive or non-positive
large, medium or small neurons (Figure 4A).
Immunoreactivity for c-Fos was found predominantly in the cytoplasm of large and
medium neurons (Figure 4C), but no
immunoreaction was found in SGCs. Tyrosine hydroxylase-like immunoreactivity was
found surrounding neurons (Figure 4E) and
SGCs. This glial cell did not show immunoreactivity to serotonin. Some
serotonin-like immunoreactivity was found in a few neurons (Figure 5A). While Glut3-like immunoreactivity was found in
neurons (Figure 5B), Glut1-like
immunoreactivity was located in the capsule of the DRG, blood vessels and SGCs.
Figure 4
Cross-section of a naive (A, C,
E) and transected (B,
D, F) Rana
catesbeiana's dorsal root ganglion. Note the larger number of
cells positive for the NADPH-diaphorase reaction (B), the
c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in the nucleus of the neuron
(D), and the more intense tyrosine hydroxylase-like
immunoreactivity surrounding neurons (F) 3 days after
sciatic nerve transection. Arrows point to neurons positive for
NADPH-diaphorase (A) and c-FOS (C). Scale
bars: A and B = 20'µm, C = 10'µm, D and F = 40'µm.
Figure 5
Serotonin- (A) and Glut3-like (B)
immunoreactivity in a medium neuron of the dorsal root ganglion from a naive
frog. Scale bars: A = 20'µm; B =
40'µm.
SNT also caused changes in histochemical and immunohistochemical patterns. The
NADPH-diaphorase reaction was more common in neurons from ipsilateral ganglia. This
reaction was strong and prevailed in medium and small neurons (Figure 4B). The number of positive SGCs was also higher after
SNT, regardless of whether these cells surrounded positive large, medium or small
neurons. Immunoreactivity for c-Fos was found in a larger number of nuclei of
sensory neurons (Figure 4D), but it was
observed in the cytoplasm of only few neurons. SGCs did not exhibit this
immunoreactivity. The number of DRG neurons and SGCs surrounded by tyrosine
hydroxylase-like immunoreactivity was also increased after SNT (Figure 4F). However, no change was found in the serotonin
immunoreactivity pattern. Similarly, Glut1 and Glut3 immunoreactivity did not change
after SNT (data not shown).
Discussion
In naive frogs, our results confirmed previous reports (1-4). SNT, in turn,
induced prominent morphological changes in the ipsilateral ganglion from axotomized
frogs. Most of these changes were similar to those described in mammals. Differently
from mammals, however, SNT did not induce proliferation of SGCs 3 days after the
surgical procedure in frogs. SGC proliferation appears to be part of the glial
responses to nerve injury in mammalian sensory ganglia (26-29). According to
Humbertson Jr. et al. (27), the SGC/neuron
ratio begins to change on the first day after axotomy, with its value doubling at 6
days and returning to baseline values around day 18. A possible explanation for this
difference may be the nervous system's slower metabolic rate in frogs than in
mammals (30). If this is true, we can think
that the proliferation of SGCs may be occurring in a slower fashion in frog DRG.
Clarification of this issue depends on the demonstration of morphological changes in
SGCs from axotomized frogs at later times. Research into this matter is underway in
our laboratory. Supportive of the continuation of this research line is the report
of increased numbers of SGCs 30 and 90 days after nerve transection in mammals
(26).Some differences between frog and rat responses appear to be common. While moderate
neuropeptide Y immunoreactivity was found in normal frog DRG, no immunoreaction to
this neuropeptide was observed in rat spinal ganglia. SNT increased neuropeptide Y
immunoreaction in ipsilateral and contralateral ganglia of the frogs, while this
increase was only seen ipsilaterally in rats (18). It is probable that the differences between frogs and rats
represent peculiar responses of frogs. Nevertheless, they do not preclude the use of
frogs to study the effects of SNT on nervous tissue. Similar to mammals (31, 32),
the axotomized frogs' DRG exhibited sensory neurons with enlarged perikarya,
swelling in mitochondria and a nuclear membrane with enfolding and indentation. In
SGCs there were more intermediate filaments, ribosomes, endoplasmic reticulum, and
mitochondria. Histochemical and immunohistochemical changes were also similar to
those described in mammals (2, 22-24,
33-37), with an increase in NADPH-diaphorase reaction and in
immunoreactivity to c-Fos and tyrosine hydroxylase, but with no change in serotonin,
Glut1 or Glut3 immunoreactivity. Thus, these changes may be playing the same
functional role in frogs. Because total mitochondrial mass and maximum rate of
oxygen consumption appear to be directly linked in mammals (38), the increased number of mitochondria found in frog DRG may
indicate a higher ability of SGCs to produce energy. This hypothesis was suggested
to explain the enlargement of mitochondria in SGCs from mammalian DRG observed after
peripheral nerve injury (29). The greater
number of ribosomes and RER reinforces the higher activation of SGCs from frog DRG
as early as 3 days after SNT. This higher activation of these cells also occurs in
mammals (39). Another change that reinforces
the activation of SGCs in frog DRG in response to SNT is the increased
NADPH-diaphorase reaction in these cells and sensory neurons. In mammals, it was
suggested that neuronal NO signals satellite glia in axotomized DRG to neutralize
the cytotoxic effect of inducible NO synthase by inducing neurotrophic factors in
the glial cell (40). A similar hypothesis may
be raised for frogs to explain the increased NADPH-diaphorase reaction in parallel
to the ultrastructural changes in SGCs.Overall, the present study provides evidence that SNT induces ultrastructural,
histochemical and immunohistochemical changes in frog DRG that are very similar to
those described in mammals. The difference appears to be the beginning of SGC
proliferation. Thus, our results support the use of frogs to study the effects of
SNT, a model of neuropathic pain, on nervous tissue. The use of frogs in these
studies provides knowledge not only about this issue, which still has many
unanswered questions, but also about the evolution of these responses in
vertebrates.