Literature DB >> 2373969

Evaluation of healthcare software from a usability perspective.

J C Lowery1, J B Martin.   

Abstract

This paper provides a framework for evaluating healthcare software from a usability perspective. The framework is based on a review of both the healthcare software literature and the general literature on software usability and evaluation. The need for such a framework arises from the proliferation of software packages in the healthcare field, and from an historical focus on the technical and functional aspects, rather than on the usability, of these packages. Healthcare managers are generally unfamiliar with usability concepts, even though usability differences among software can play a significant role in the acceptance and effectiveness of systems. Six major areas of usability are described, and specific criteria which can be used in the software evaluation process are also presented.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2373969     DOI: 10.1007/bf00995877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  10 in total

1.  Evaluating and selecting a computer system.

Authors:  H G Williams; J E Toole
Journal:  Top Health Care Financ       Date:  1978

2.  Chief executives define their own data needs.

Authors:  J F Rockart
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  1979 Mar-Apr

3.  Flexible installation, financing spur microcomputer demand.

Authors:  K Carter
Journal:  Mod Healthc       Date:  1986-06-20

4.  The human side of the RFP process.

Authors:  P Anderson
Journal:  Comput Healthc       Date:  1984-12

5.  "There are differences in system capabilities...". Interview by Ken Kadash.

Authors:  D Trammell
Journal:  Comput Healthc       Date:  1984-12

6.  Planning and selecting an information system.

Authors:  C J Austin
Journal:  Hospitals       Date:  1977-10-16

7.  Hospitals' 1986 info spending tops $3.5 billion.

Authors:  C L Packer
Journal:  Hospitals       Date:  1986-12-20

8.  Determining information needs of hospital managers: the critical-success-factor approach.

Authors:  J W Thomas; J Lowery
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  An integrated surgical suite management information system.

Authors:  J B Martin; M E Cantrell; R G Fichman; P K Hunsberger; M Radoyevich
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Evaluation tools for hospital computer equipment and systems.

Authors:  R R Grams
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.460

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  The TEAM evaluation approach to Project FAMUS, a pan-Canadian risk register for primary care.

Authors:  A Grant; Y Lussier; E Delisle; S Dubois; R Bernier
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1992

2.  A new microcomputer software system evaluation paradigm: the medical perspective.

Authors:  P Kokol
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  A tool for software and hardware evaluation.

Authors:  P Kokol
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Why Are Digital Health Care Systems Still Poorly Designed, and Why Is Health Care Practice Not Asking for More? Three Paths Toward a Sustainable Digital Work Environment.

Authors:  Johanna Persson; Christofer Rydenfält
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.