Literature DB >> 23739465

Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review.

P J Gerber1, A N Hristov, B Henderson, H Makkar, J Oh, C Lee, R Meinen, F Montes, T Ott, J Firkins, A Rotz, C Dell, A T Adesogan, W Z Yang, J M Tricarico, E Kebreab, G Waghorn, J Dijkstra, S Oosting.   

Abstract

Although livestock production accounts for a sizeable share of global greenhouse gas emissions, numerous technical options have been identified to mitigate these emissions. In this review, a subset of these options, which have proven to be effective, are discussed. These include measures to reduce CH4 emissions from enteric fermentation by ruminants, the largest single emission source from the global livestock sector, and for reducing CH4 and N2O emissions from manure. A unique feature of this review is the high level of attention given to interactions between mitigation options and productivity. Among the feed supplement options for lowering enteric emissions, dietary lipids, nitrates and ionophores are identified as the most effective. Forage quality, feed processing and precision feeding have the best prospects among the various available feed and feed management measures. With regard to manure, dietary measures that reduce the amount of N excreted (e.g. better matching of dietary protein to animal needs), shift N excretion from urine to faeces (e.g. tannin inclusion at low levels) and reduce the amount of fermentable organic matter excreted are recommended. Among the many 'end-of-pipe' measures available for manure management, approaches that capture and/or process CH4 emissions during storage (e.g. anaerobic digestion, biofiltration, composting), as well as subsurface injection of manure, are among the most encouraging options flagged in this section of the review. The importance of a multiple gas perspective is critical when assessing mitigation potentials, because most of the options reviewed show strong interactions among sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The paper reviews current knowledge on potential pollution swapping, whereby the reduction of one GHG or emission source leads to unintended increases in another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23739465     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731113000876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  34 in total

Review 1.  Agriculture, dairy and fishery farming practices and greenhouse gas emission footprint: a strategic appraisal for mitigation.

Authors:  Avijit Ghosh; Sukanya Misra; Ranjan Bhattacharyya; Abhijit Sarkar; Amit Kumar Singh; Vikas Chandra Tyagi; Ram Vinod Kumar; Vijay Singh Meena
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Host genetics associated with gut microbiota and methane emission in cattle.

Authors:  Sudarshan Mahala; Anju Kala; Amit Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Laser methane detector-based quantification of methane emissions from indoor-fed Fogera dairy cows.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kobayashi; Fujiang Hou; Atsushi Tsunekawa; Tianhai Yan; Firew Tegegne; Asaminew Tassew; Yeshambel Mekuriaw; Shigdaf Mekuriaw; Beyadglign Hunegnaw; Wondimeneh Mekonnen; Toshiyoshi Ichinohe
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2021-01-01

Review 4.  Safety of Alternative Proteins: Technological, Environmental and Regulatory Aspects of Cultured Meat, Plant-Based Meat, Insect Protein and Single-Cell Protein.

Authors:  Joshua Hadi; Gale Brightwell
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-28

Review 5.  Ruminal Fistulation and Cannulation: A Necessary Procedure for the Advancement of Biotechnological Research in Ruminants.

Authors:  Cristina Castillo; Joaquin Hernández
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Association of Temperament and Acute Stress Responsiveness with Productivity, Feed Efficiency, and Methane Emissions in Beef Cattle: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Pol Llonch; Miguel Somarriba; Carol-Anne Duthie; Marie J Haskell; John A Rooke; Shane Troy; Rainer Roehe; Simon P Turner
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-06-13

7.  In vitro evaluation of different varieties of maize fodder for their methane generation potential and digestibility with goat rumen liquor.

Authors:  Shalini Vaswani; Ravindra Kumar; Vinod Kumar; Debashis Roy; Muneendra Kumar
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-11-08

8.  Quantification of Methane and Ammonia Emissions in a Naturally Ventilated Barn by Using Defined Criteria to Calculate Emission Rates.

Authors:  Alexander J Schmithausen; Inga Schiefler; Manfred Trimborn; Katrin Gerlach; Karl-Heinz Südekum; Martin Pries; Wolfgang Büscher
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Phloroglucinol Degradation in the Rumen Promotes the Capture of Excess Hydrogen Generated from Methanogenesis Inhibition.

Authors:  Gonzalo Martinez-Fernandez; Stuart E Denman; Jane Cheung; Christopher S McSweeney
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  In vitro evaluation of nano zinc oxide (nZnO) on mitigation of gaseous emissions.

Authors:  Niloy Chandra Sarker; Faithe Keomanivong; Md Borhan; Shafiqur Rahman; Kendall Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.