Literature DB >> 23739216

Ambient temperature and congenital heart defects.

K Agay-Shay1, M Friger, S Linn, A Peled, Y Amitai, C Peretz.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Does maternal exposure during pregnancy to higher ambient temperature increase the risk of congenital heart defects (CHDs)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Significant associations were found between maternal exposure during pregnancy to higher ambient temperature and CHDs risk especially during the cold season. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: From rodents to non-human primates, a teratogenic effect of hyperthermic insult has been demonstrated. There are fewer data regarding the effect on the human fetus and specifically the association between maternal exposures during pregnancy to higher ambient temperature and CHDs. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This population registry-based cohort study included 135 527 live and stillbirths in the Tel-Aviv region of Israel in 2000-2006. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Two clinical diagnostic groups of isolated cardiac defects (atrial septal defects and ventricular septal defects: n = 542 and 481, respectively) and one group of multiple cardiac defects (defined by the presence of two or more cardiac malformations, n = 607) were studied. Temperature measurements were constructed from ambient stations and used to assess the impact of maternal exposure to average ambient temperature and extreme heat events (daily average temperature above the 90th percentile) during Weeks 3-8 of pregnancy on risk of CHDs. Logistic models, adjusted for sociodemographic covariates, were used to evaluate the associations between temperature and CHDs. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, we found no significant associations between ambient temperature and CHDs throughout the year, with one exception for multiple CHDs. After stratifying by season of conception, continuous exposure to average ambient temperature and maximum peak temperature (1°C increase) during the cold season increased the risk for multiple CHDs [odds ratio (OR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.10 and OR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.05, respectively]. A 1-day increase in extreme heat events increased the risk for multiple CHDs (OR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.21) and also for isolated atrial septal defects (OR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.19). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Information both on CHD cases and on ambient temperature was based on registries and it is possible that this may cause some misclassification. In urban areas, pregnant women may be exposed to higher temperatures than recorded by ambient monitors because of the 'heat island effect'. Furthermore, data for the amount of time spent indoors were unavailable and this could have resulted in exposure misclassification. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The findings are important within the context of global climate change, which may have implications for public health in countries with mild winters and hot summers. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by the Israeli Ministry of Environmental Protection (research grant-7-2-7) and by the Environment and Health Fund (PhD Fellowship Program). There are no competing interests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth defects; congenital heart defects; congenital malformation; heat wave; temperature

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23739216     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  15 in total

1.  Maternal ambient heat exposure during early pregnancy in summer and spring and congenital heart defects - A large US population-based, case-control study.

Authors:  Shao Lin; Ziqiang Lin; Yanqiu Ou; Aida Soim; Srishti Shrestha; Yi Lu; Scott Sheridan; Thomas J Luben; Edward Fitzgerald; Erin Bell; Gary M Shaw; Jennita Reefhuis; Peter H Langlois; Paul Romitti; Marcia L Feldkamp; Sadia Malik; Cristian Pantea; Seema Nayak; Syni-An Hwang; Marilyn Browne
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 2.  A systematic review of the health effects of prenatal exposure to disaster.

Authors:  Dell D Saulnier; Kim Brolin
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Exploration of spatial patterns of congenital anomalies in Los Angeles County using the vital statistics birth master file.

Authors:  Radhika Rible; Efren Aguilar; Angela Chen; Joshua L Bader; Leslie Goodyear-Moya; Karen Teekadai Singh; Suzanne E Paulson; Julie Friedman; Nilufar Izadpanah; Janet Pregler
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Prenatal ambient temperature and risk for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jennifer Puthota; Andrea Alatorre; Samantha Walsh; Jose C Clemente; Dolores Malaspina; Julie Spicer
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.662

5.  Modeling complex effects of exposure to particulate matter and extreme heat during pregnancy on congenital heart defects: A U.S. population-based case-control study in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Authors:  Will Simmons; Shao Lin; Thomas J Luben; Scott C Sheridan; Peter H Langlois; Gary M Shaw; Jennita Reefhuis; Paul A Romitti; Marcia L Feldkamp; Wendy N Nembhard; Tania A Desrosiers; Marilyn L Browne; Jeanette A Stingone
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 10.753

6.  Hot Days in Early Pregnancy: A Potential Risk Factor for Congenital Heart Defects.

Authors:  Lindsey Konkel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Risk of Congenital Heart Defects after Ambient Heat Exposure Early in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; William D Fraser; Reg Sauve; Marianne Bilodeau-Bertrand; Tom Kosatsky
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Impacts of High Environmental Temperatures on Congenital Anomalies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marjan Mosalman Haghighi; Caradee Yael Wright; Julian Ayer; Michael F Urban; Minh Duc Pham; Melanie Boeckmann; Ashtyn Areal; Bianca Wernecke; Callum P Swift; Matthew Robinson; Robyn S Hetem; Matthew F Chersich
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Can cell proliferation of umbilical cord blood cells reflect environmental exposures?

Authors:  Lena Novack; Esther Manor; Elena Gurevich; Maayan Yitshak-Sade; Daniella Landau; Batia Sarov; Reli Hershkovitz; Doron Dukler; Tali Vodonos; Isabella Karakis
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-07-24

10.  Congenital heart defects of fetus after maternal exposure to organic and inorganic environmental factors: a cohort study.

Authors:  Wei Gong; Qianhong Liang; Dongming Zheng; Risheng Zhong; Yunjie Wen; Xiaodan Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.