Literature DB >> 23739198

Functional and structural abnormalities after milligan hemorrhoidectomy: a comparison with healthy subjects.

Helgi Örn Johannsson1, Lars Påhlman, Wilhelm Graf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is a rare but well-known adverse effect of hemorrhoidectomy.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify possible reasons for incontinence after hemorrhoidectomy.
DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective comparative study. SETTINGS: The study was performed in 1 university hospital and 1 general district hospital serving 2 counties in central Sweden. PATIENTS: In a cohort of 418 patients with consecutive Milligan hemorrhoidectomies, 40 reported fecal incontinence that was attributed to surgery. Of these, 19 patients agreed to participate. Fifteen age- and sex-matched patients from the same cohort who were operated on, but without symptoms of incontinence, were also studied, as was a third reference group of 19 age- and sex-matched persons serving as a population-based control group. INTERVENTION: All of the participants answered a bowel function questionnaire and underwent clinical evaluation, including rectoscopy, anal manometry, saline infusion test, and endoanal ultrasound. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated anal resting and squeeze pressures, sphincter defects, and continence function.
RESULTS: The symptomatic patients had higher incontinence scores than the control groups (p = 0.00002). The mean resting pressure at the high-pressure zone was also reduced in this group (p = 0.047). External sphincter injuries were detected in 4 (20%) of 19 subjects compared with none in the control group (p = 0.11). Saline infusion test in the patients reporting incontinence showed reduced ability to hold liquids compared with healthy controls (p = 0.004). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by selection bias and limited numbers in the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In the group of patients reporting incontinence after hemorrhoidectomy, there was a proportion with sphincter defects and impaired sphincter function. These results indicate a need for cautious patient selection and improved or alternative surgical techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23739198     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828deb6d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  5 in total

Review 1.  Complications Following Anorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Hiroko Kunitake; Vitaliy Poylin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-03

2.  Post-surgical fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Filippo Pucciani
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-12-30

3.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Safety and effectiveness of hemorrhoidal artery ligation using the HAL-RAR technique for hemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  Konstantinos Karkalemis; Petros Loukas Chalkias; Anna Kasouli; Elina Chatzaki; Spilios Papanikolaou; Georgia Dedemadi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  G Gallo; J Martellucci; A Sturiale; G Clerico; G Milito; F Marino; G Cocorullo; P Giordano; M Mistrangelo; M Trompetto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.781

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.