We characterized flame retardant (FR) morphologies and spatial distributions in 7 consumer products and 7 environmental dusts to determine their implications for transfer mechanisms, human exposure, and the reproducibility of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) dust measurements. We characterized individual particles using scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) and Raman micro-spectroscopy (RMS). Samples were screened for the presence of 3 FR constituents (bromine, phosphorous, non-salt chlorine) and 2 metal synergists (antimony and bismuth). Subsequent analyses of select samples by RMS enabled molecular identification of the FR compounds and matrix materials. The consumer products and dust samples possessed FR elemental weight percents of up to 36% and 31%, respectively. We identified 24 FR-containing particles in the dust samples and classified them into 9 types based on morphology and composition. We observed a broad range of morphologies for these FR-containing particles, suggesting FR transfer to dust via multiple mechanisms. We developed an equation to describe the heterogeneity of FR-containing particles in environmental dust samples. The number of individual FR-containing particles expected in a 1-mg dust sample with a FR concentration of 100ppm ranged from <1 to >1000 particles. The presence of rare, high-concentration bromine particles was correlated with decabromodiphenyl ether concentrations obtained via GC-MS. When FRs are distributed heterogeneously in highly concentrated dust particles, human exposure to FRs may be characterized by high transient exposures interspersed by periods of low exposure, and GC-MS FR concentrations may exhibit large variability in replicate subsamples. Current limitations of this SEM/EDS technique include potential false negatives for volatile and chlorinated FRs and greater quantitation uncertainty for brominated FR in aluminum-rich matrices.
We characterized flame retardant (pan class="Gene">FR) morphologies and spatial distributions in 7 consumer products and 7 environmental dusts to determine their implications for transfer mechanisms, human exposure, and the reproducibility of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) dust measurements. We characterized individual particles using scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) and Raman micro-spectroscopy (RMS). Samples were screened for the presence of 3 FR constituents (bromine, phosphorous, non-salt chlorine) and 2 metal synergists (antimony and bismuth). Subsequent analyses of select samples by RMS enabled molecular identification of the FR compounds and matrix materials. The consumer products and dust samples possessed FR elemental weight percents of up to 36% and 31%, respectively. We identified 24 FR-containing particles in the dust samples and classified them into 9 types based on morphology and composition. We observed a broad range of morphologies for these FR-containing particles, suggesting FR transfer to dust via multiple mechanisms. We developed an equation to describe the heterogeneity of FR-containing particles in environmental dust samples. The number of individualFR-containing particles expected in a 1-mg dust sample with a FR concentration of 100ppm ranged from <1 to >1000 particles. The presence of rare, high-concentration bromine particles was correlated with decabromodiphenyl ether concentrations obtained via GC-MS. When FRs are distributed heterogeneously in highly concentrated dust particles, human exposure to FRs may be characterized by high transient exposures interspersed by periods of low exposure, and GC-MS FR concentrations may exhibit large variability in replicate subsamples. Current limitations of this SEM/EDS technique include potential false negatives for volatile and chlorinated FRs and greater quantitation uncertainty for brominated FR in aluminum-rich matrices.
Authors: Todd P Whitehead; F Reber Brown; Catherine Metayer; June-Soo Park; Monique Does; Myrto X Petreas; Patricia A Buffler; Stephen M Rappaport Journal: Environ Int Date: 2013-04-27 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Susan D Shaw; Arlene Blum; Roland Weber; Kurunthachalam Kannan; David Rich; Donald Lucas; Catherine P Koshland; Dina Dobraca; Sarah Hanson; Linda S Birnbaum Journal: Rev Environ Health Date: 2010 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 3.458
Authors: Thomas F Webster; Stuart Harrad; James R Millette; R David Holbrook; Jeffrey M Davis; Heather M Stapleton; Joseph G Allen; Michael D McClean; Catalina Ibarra; Mohamed Abou-Elwafa Abdallah; Adrian Covaci Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Elzbieta A Stefaniak; Anita Alsecz; Ray Frost; Zoltán Máthé; István E Sajó; Szabina Török; Anna Worobiec; René Van Grieken Journal: J Hazard Mater Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 10.588
Authors: Gilliane Davison; Karoline K Barkjohn; Gayle S W Hagler; Amara L Holder; Sarah Coefield; Curtis Noonan; Beth Hassett-Sipple Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-02-15