| Literature DB >> 23737855 |
Hermínia Marques Capistrano1, Eliene Magda de Assis, Rosana Maria Leal, Maria Eugênia Alvarez-Leite, Sylvie Brener, Esther Margarida Alves Ferreira Bastos.
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of Brazilian green propolis in comparison to miconazole gel in the treatment of Candida-associated denture stomatitis. Methods. Forty-five denture stomatitis patients, with palatal mucosa erythema levels classified according to Newtons's criteria and with positive culture to Candida spp., were randomly divided into three treatment groups: 15 received miconazole gel 2%, 15 received propolis gel 2,5%, and 15 received propolis 24% for mouthwash. After four daily use lasting two weeks, they were reexamined for the denture stomatitis degree and for a second culture of Candida. The Wilcoxon's test was applied to compare the results of clinical classification of the denture stomatitis and the Candida spp. colonies numbers, before and after each treatment. The Kruskall-Wallis's test was used to compare efficacy among the three treatment groups. Results. There were a significant reduction or complete remission of denture stomatitis (P < 0.05) and a significant decrease of Candida colonies for the three groups (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the efficacy among the treatment groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion. Brazilian green propolis has a similar effect as miconazole in the treatment of Candida-associated denture stomatitis being an alternative in the therapeutics of this condition.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23737855 PMCID: PMC3659645 DOI: 10.1155/2013/947980
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Quantitative evaluation of yeasts (CFUs) and clinical classification of denture stomatitis before and after the treatment with Miconazole gel 2%.
| Patient | Age | Gender |
|
| Denture stomatitis classification | Denture stomatitis classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 58 | F | 20 | 1 | II | Cure |
| 2 | 79 | M | 189 | 79 | III | 1 |
| 3 | 49 | F | 12 | 0 | I | Cure |
| 4 | 66 | F | 12 | 0 | II | I |
| 5 | 69 | F | 19 | 0 | I | Cure |
| 6 | 73 | F | 18 | 0 | I | Cure |
| 7 | 72 | F | 95 | 2 | I | Cure |
| 8 | 73 | F | 15 | 0 | III | I |
| 9 | 66 | F | 38 | 0 | II | I |
| 10 | 65 | F | 27 | 1 | II | II |
| 11 | 60 | F | 226 | 0 | I | I |
| 12 | 61 | F | 43 | 0 | I | I |
| 13 | 27 | F | 11 | 1 | III | I |
| 14 | 74 | M | 62 | 0 | I | Cure |
| 15 | 45 | M | 168 | 0 | III | I |
*CFUs: colony-forming units.
**Newton's classification (type: 1; 2; 3).
Clinical evaluation before and after treatment—Wilcoxon's test P = 0.0007.
Quantitative microbiological evaluation before and after treatment—Wilcoxon's test P = 0.0022.
Mean age: 62.47 ± 13.54.
Quantitative evaluation of yeasts (CFUs) and clinical classification of denture stomatitis before and after the treatment with propylene glycol Brazilian green propolis gel 2.5%.
| Patient | Age | Gender |
|
| Denture stomatitis classification** | Denture stomatitis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52 | F | 64 | 0 | I | Cure |
| 2 | 78 | F | 78 | 1 | I | Cure |
| 3 | 61 | M | 84 | 0 | II | Cure |
| 4 | 68 | F | 136 | 6 | I | I |
| 5 | 30 | F | 45 | 4 | II | II |
| 6 | 58 | F | 288 | 89 | II | I |
| 7 | 78 | F | 189 | 0 | II | I |
| 8 | 72 | F | 9 | 0 | III | Cure |
| 9 | 59 | F | 548 | 0 | III | I |
| 10 | 66 | F | 52 | 24 | II | I |
| 11 | 50 | F | 58 | 0 | I | Cure |
| 12 | 46 | F | 158 | 33 | II | I |
| 13 | 45 | F | 472 | 117 | III | I |
| 14 | 53 | F | 283 | 23 | III | I |
| 15 | 50 | M | 47 | 0 | I | I |
*CFUs: colony-forming units.
**Newton's classification (type: 1; 2; 3).
Clinical evaluation before and after treatment—Wilcoxon's test P = 0.0007.
Quantitative microbiological evaluation before and after treatment—Wilcoxon's test P = 0.0022.
Mean age: 57.73 ± 13.24.
Quantitative evaluation of yeasts (CFUs) and clinical classification of denture stomatitis before and after the treatment with propylene glycol Brazilian green propolis 24% solution for mouthwash.
| Patient | Age | Gender |
|
| Denture stomatitis classification | Denture stomatitis classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66 | F | 105 | 0 | II | Cure |
| 2 | 66 | M | 269 | 1 | III | Cure |
| 3 | 60 | F | 14 | 0 | II | I |
| 4 | 67 | M | 18 | 0 | I | Cure |
| 5 | 65 | F | 12 | 0 | I | Cure |
| 6 | 68 | F | 18 | 0 | III | III |
| 7 | 63 | F | 226 | 1 | I | Cure |
| 8 | 65 | F | 22 | 1 | III | III |
| 9 | 46 | F | 19 | 0 | I | I |
| 10 | 60 | F | 19 | 0 | III | III |
| 11 | 60 | F | 17 | 0 | I | Cure |
| 12 | 61 | F | 28 | 0 | I | Cure |
| 13 | 65 | F | 12 | 0 | I | Cure |
| 14 | 63 | F | 296 | 0 | III | III |
| 15 | 56 | F | 113 | 0 | I | Cure |
*CFUs: colony-forming units.
**Newton's classification (type: 1; 2; 3).
Clinical evaluation before and after treatment—Wilcoxon's test P = 0.0007.
Quantitative microbiological evaluation before and after treatment—Wilcoxon's test P = 0.00077.
Mean age: 62.06 ± 5.52.