Literature DB >> 23737543

Endoscopic vs microsurgical transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: outcomes in a concurrent series of patients using modern criteria for remission.

Robert M Starke1, Daniel M S Raper, Spencer C Payne, Mary L Vance, Edward H Oldfield, John A Jane.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: It is unclear whether endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS) or microsurgical transsphenoidal surgery (MTS) is a superior surgical approach for pituitary adenomas.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the outcome of surgery with ETSS and MTS by experienced pituitary surgeons using criteria of remission using current consensus criteria for acromegaly. DESIGN AND
SETTING: This was a retrospective review of prospectively recorded outcomes. The study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. Patients, Interventions, and Outcome Measures: Remission was defined as a normal IGF-I level and either suppressed GH less than 0.4 ng/mL during an oral glucose tolerance test or random GH less than 1.0 ng/mL. The Youden indices were calculated to determine the optimal cutoffs for using immediate postoperative GH levels to predict the results of later testing for remission.
RESULTS: Preoperative demographics and tumor characteristics were not significantly different between patients undergoing ETSS (72 patients) or MTS (41 patients). Overall, postoperative remission was achieved in 20 of 23 microadenomas (87%) and 59 of 90 macroadenomas (66%). Remission rates and perioperative complications were not significantly different between ETSS and MTS groups, except for self-reported sinusitis and alterations in taste or smell, which were significantly higher in patients treated with ETSS. Preoperative variables predicting remission in multivariate analysis included GH less than 45 ng/mL [odds ratio (OR) 6.4, P = .010)] and Knosp score of 0-2 (OR 6.8, P < .001). Postoperative in-hospital GH less than 1.15 ng/mL provided the best predictor of remission (OR 7.7, P < .001; sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 85%) defined by follow-up testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly by experienced pituitary surgeons do not differ between endoscopic and microscopic techniques. Regardless of the mode of resection, patients with high preoperative GH levels and Knosp scores are less likely to achieve remission. An immediate postoperative GH level of less than 1.15 ng/mL provides the best immediate predictor of remission, but long-term outcomes are indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23737543     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-1036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  65 in total

1.  Endoscopic versus microscopic approach for surgical treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Hussein Fathalla; Michael D Cusimano; Antonio Di Ieva; John Lee; Omar Alsharif; Jeannette Goguen; Stanley Zhang; Harley Smyth
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Predictors of surgical outcome and early criteria of remission in acromegaly.

Authors:  Ximene Antunes; Nina Ventura; Gustavo Bittencourt Camilo; Luiz Eduardo Wildemberg; Andre Guasti; Paulo José M Pereira; Aline Helen Silva Camacho; Leila Chimelli; Paulo Niemeyer; Mônica R Gadelha; Leandro Kasuki
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Endoscopic endonasal transsellar approach for laterally extended pituitary adenomas: volumetric analysis of cavernous sinus invasion.

Authors:  Masaaki Taniguchi; Kohkichi Hosoda; Nobuyuki Akutsu; Yutaka Takahashi; Eiji Kohmura
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  Random Gh and Igf-I levels after transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: relation with long-term remission.

Authors:  Marcelo Lemos Vieira da Cunha; Luis Alencar Biurrum Borba; Cesar Luiz Boguszewski
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Impact of pre-treatment with somatostatin analogs on surgical management of acromegalic patients referred to a single center.

Authors:  Susanna Bacigaluppi; Federico Gatto; Pasquale Anania; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Diego Criminelli Rossi; Giulia Benvegnu; Elena Nazzari; Renato Spaziante; Massimo Giusti; Diego Ferone; Gianluigi Zona
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  Somatostatin receptor ligands in the treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Monica R Gadelha; Luiz Eduardo Wildemberg; Marcello D Bronstein; Federico Gatto; Diego Ferone
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  A structural and functional acromegaly classification.

Authors:  Daniel Cuevas-Ramos; John D Carmichael; Odelia Cooper; Vivien S Bonert; Arkadiusz Gertych; Adam N Mamelak; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Pro: endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is superior to microscope-based transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Adam N Mamelak
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 9.  The role of combination medical therapy in the treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Dawn Shao Ting Lim; Maria Fleseriu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

10.  Volumetry in the Assessment of Pituitary Adenoma Resection: Endoscopy versus Microscopy.

Authors:  Anthony C Wang; Ashish H Shah; Charif Sidani; Brandon G Gaynor; Simon Dockrell; S Shelby Burks; Zoukaa B Sargi; Roy R Casiano; Jacques J Morcos
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.