Literature DB >> 23737306

Trajectory of parental hope when a child has difficult-to-treat cancer: a prospective qualitative study.

L Granek1, M Barrera, J Shaheed, D Nicholas, L Beaune, N D'Agostino, E Bouffet, B Antle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This prospective and longitudinal study was designed to further our understanding of parental hope when a child is being treated for a malignancy resistant to treatment over three time points during the first year after diagnosis using a qualitative approach to inquiry.
METHODS: We prospectively recruited parents of pediatric cancer patients with a poor prognosis who were treated in the Hematology/Oncology Program at a large children's hospital for this longitudinal grounded theory study. Parents were interviewed at three time points: within 3 months of the initial diagnosis, at 6 months, and at 9 months. Data collection and analysis took place concurrently using line-by-line coding. Constant comparison was used to examine relationships within and across codes and categories.
RESULTS: Two overarching categories defining hope as a positive inner source were found across time, but their frequency varied depending on how well the child was doing and disease progression: future-oriented hope and present-oriented hope. Under future-oriented hope, we identified the following: hope for a cure and treatment success, hope for the child's future, hope for a miracle, and hope for more quality time with child. Under present-oriented hope, we identified hope for day-to-day/moment-to-moment, hope for no pain and suffering, and hope for no complications.
CONCLUSIONS: For parents of children with a diagnosis of cancer with a poor prognosis, hope is an internal resource that can be present and future focused. These views fluctuated over time in response to changes in the child's well-being and disease progression.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; caregivers; longitudinal design; parental hope; pediatric oncology; qualitative methods

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23737306     DOI: 10.1002/pon.3305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  12 in total

1.  Changes Over Time in Good-Parent Beliefs Among Parents of Children With Serious Illness: A Two-Year Cohort Study.

Authors:  Douglas L Hill; Jennifer A Faerber; Yimei Li; Victoria A Miller; Karen W Carroll; Wynne Morrison; Pamela S Hinds; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Changes in Parental Hopes for Seriously Ill Children.

Authors:  Douglas L Hill; Pamela G Nathanson; Karen W Carroll; Theodore E Schall; Victoria A Miller; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Good-parent beliefs of parents of seriously ill children.

Authors:  Chris Feudtner; Jennifer K Walter; Jennifer A Faerber; Douglas L Hill; Karen W Carroll; Cynthia J Mollen; Victoria A Miller; Wynne E Morrison; David Munson; Tammy I Kang; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Children with minimal chance for cure: parent proxy of the child's health-related quality of life and the effect on parental physical and mental health during treatment.

Authors:  Belinda N Mandrell; Justin Baker; Deena Levine; Jami Gattuso; Nancy West; April Sykes; Amar Gajjar; Alberto Broniscer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Parent Outlook: How Parents View the Road Ahead as They Embark on Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Their Child.

Authors:  Christina K Ullrich; Angie Mae Rodday; Kristin Bingen; Mary Jo Kupst; Sunita K Patel; Karen L Syrjala; Lynnette L Harris; Christopher J Recklitis; Lisa Schwartz; Stella Davies; Eva C Guinan; Grace Chang; Joanne Wolfe; Susan K Parsons
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  The under reporting of recruitment strategies in research with children with life-threatening illnesses: A systematic review.

Authors:  Briony F Hudson; Linda Jm Oostendorp; Bridget Candy; Victoria Vickerstaff; Louise Jones; Monica Lakhanpaul; Myra Bluebond-Langner; Paddy Stone
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  Hope in Iranian mothers of children with cancer: a descriptive correlational study.

Authors:  Ensieh Fathollah Zadeh; Yvonne Parry; Peyman Eshghi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 3.359

8.  Regoaling: a conceptual model of how parents of children with serious illness change medical care goals.

Authors:  Douglas L Hill; Victoria Miller; Jennifer K Walter; Karen W Carroll; Wynne E Morrison; David A Munson; Tammy I Kang; Pamela S Hinds; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 9.  A conceptual model of barriers and facilitators to primary clinical teams requesting pediatric palliative care consultation based upon a narrative review.

Authors:  Jennifer K Walter; Douglas L Hill; Concetta DiDomenico; Shefali Parikh; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Shades of hope: Marcel's notion of hope in end-of-life care.

Authors:  Marta Szabat; Jeanette Bresson Ladegaard Knox
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.