Literature DB >> 23736148

Liver stiffness measurement versus liver biopsy to predict survival and decompensations of cirrhosis among HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients.

Juan Macías1, Angela Camacho, Miguel A Von Wichmann, Luis F López-Cortés, Enrique Ortega, Cristina Tural, Maria J Ríos, Dolores Merino, Francisco Téllez, Manuel Márquez, María Mancebo, Juan A Pineda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic performance of liver biopsy with that of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) to predict survival and liver decompensations among HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Cohort of 297 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, who underwent a liver biopsy and LSM separated by 12 months or less, followed in 10 Spanish tertiary care centers from December 2005 to December 2011 (median follow-up, 5 years; interquartile range, 4.2-5.4 years). Liver biopsies were staged following the Scheuer's score. LSM was obtained by hepatic transient elastometry. A survival analysis was carried out and the integrated discrimination improvement was computed to compare the ability of the survival models to predict outcomes. The incidence of death from any cause and of development of the first decompensation of cirrhosis was calculated.
RESULTS: Overall mortality rate was 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.49] per 100 person-years. The adjusted hazard ratio [AHR (95% CI)] of baseline fibrosis (per stage of fibrosis) was 1.52 (1.08-2.15, P=0.017) and of LSM (per 5 kPa increase) 1.28 (1.12-1.46, P<0.001). LSM including models yielded a performance 3.9% better than the liver biopsy-based models (P=0.072). For the prediction of liver decompensations, the AHR (95% CI) of baseline fibrosis by liver biopsy (per stage of fibrosis) was 1.67 (1.15-2.43, P=0.007) and of LSM (per 5 kPa increase) 1.37 (1.21-1.54, P<0.001). LSM-based models yielded a performance 8.4% better than the liver biopsy-based models (P=0.045).
CONCLUSION: LSM-based prediction achieves a similar yield than liver biopsy-based models to predict overall mortality in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Models including LSM could predict better liver decompensations than liver biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23736148     DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32836381f3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS        ISSN: 0269-9370            Impact factor:   4.177


  11 in total

Review 1.  Critical comparison of elastography methods to assess chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Thierry Poynard; Laurent Castera
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Liver-related Events in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected Persons With Occult Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Amine Benmassaoud; Roy Nitulescu; Thomas Pembroke; Alex S Halme; Peter Ghali; Marc Deschenes; Philip Wong; Marina B Klein; Giada Sebastiani
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Advances in the management of HIV/HCV coinfection.

Authors:  Mattias Mandorfer; Philipp Schwabl; Sebastian Steiner; Thomas Reiberger; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 4.  Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Fibrosis Regression Explains Differences in Outcome in HIV-/HCV-Coinfected Patients with Cirrhosis After Sustained Virological Response.

Authors:  José Luis Casado; María Angeles Esteban; Sara Bañón; Ana Moreno; María J Perez-Elías; María Luisa Mateos; Santiago Moreno; Carmen Quereda
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Renal Interstitial Fibrosis: An Imperfect Predictor of Kidney Disease Progression in Some Patient Cohorts.

Authors:  Hanni Menn-Josephy; Carol S Lee; Angela Nolin; Marta Christov; Denis V Rybin; Janice M Weinberg; Joel Henderson; Ramon Bonegio; Andrea Havasi
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.754

7.  Enhanced liver fibrosis marker as a noninvasive predictor of mortality in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected women from a multicenter study of women with or at risk for HIV.

Authors:  Marion G Peters; Peter Bacchetti; Ross Boylan; Audrey L French; Phyllis C Tien; Michael W Plankey; Marshall J Glesby; Michael Augenbraun; Elizabeth T Golub; Roksana Karim; Julie Parkes; William Rosenberg
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2016-03-13       Impact factor: 4.177

8.  Hepatic fibrosis and factors associated with liver stiffness in HIV mono-infected individuals.

Authors:  Mihály Sulyok; Tamás Ferenci; Mihály Makara; Gábor Horváth; János Szlávik; Zsófia Rupnik; Luca Kormos; Zsuzsanna Gerlei; Zita Sulyok; István Vályi-Nagy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Progress in eradication of HCV in HIV positive patients with significant liver fibrosis in Vienna.

Authors:  Sebastian Steiner; Theresa Bucsics; Philipp Schwabl; Mattias Mandorfer; Bernhard Scheiner; Maximilian Christopher Aichelburg; Katharina Grabmeier-Pfistershammer; Peter Ferenci; Michael Trauner; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Thomas Reiberger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Combining liver stiffness with hyaluronic acid provides superior prognostic performance in chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Janne Fuglsang Hansen; Karen Mølgaard Christiansen; Benjamin Staugaard; Belinda Klemmensen Moessner; Søren Lillevang; Aleksander Krag; Peer Brehm Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.